Grisha Mamurin, the grandson of one of Russia’s richest oligarchs, Igor Nekludov, has been the subject of online rage for posting videos of women kissing him and showing their breasts for money. Various outlets, decidedly or implicitly feminist, or just covering the regular news cycle, have described the different scenarios as “degrading” or “humiliating”.At the end of the day, if you're going to look at things from a material perspective, it's all supply and demand. And the thing about attractive young women is that they are literally making more of them every single day. The supply is far from infinite, of course, but there are no involuntary monopolies.
Virtually no mainstream commentators, unless you count members of the public in discussion sections, have sought to hold the girls accountable for their conscious choice to strip naked for or kiss Mamurin in view of perhaps hundreds of fellow Russians.
Because Mamurin’s asking price was only the equivalent of $120 (a larger sum in Russia but by no means massive), the scenes raise alarming questions about the extent to which many women will perform certain sexual acts for money. In addition, there has been a subsequent and all-encompassing infantilization of these girls by feminists.
These compulsive SJWs, unsurprisingly, solely blame the male offering the financial incentive for the perceived degradation and humiliation. The logically pervasive theme of their explanations, though they would deny it, is that large numbers of women cannot control themselves when asked to perform for only a moderate sum of money. So imagine the lack of self-control and self-determination if that figure were $12,000 or $120,000, not $120.
Ironically enough, it's the very women who are most angered by those whose equalitarian policies are to blame for reducing young women to valuing themselves, and being valued, for nothing more than what they bring to the sexual table.
24 comments:
The bottom line is garbled. Isn't is supposed to look: '...to blame for reducing...'?
^ 'Is't it supposed...'
They would probably have been less offended if it had come out that Grisha had talked the girls into doing it for free, like Charlie Sheen or something.
Paying the women not only makes them come off as whores, but Grisha as a BETA.
tag the sponsor dot will let you in on what those girls would end up doing for that much money
I'm not sure why they're so angry. Women need a way to close that mythical gender wage gap, right? Easy peasy.
Corvinus said...
"Paying the women not only makes them come off as whores, but Grisha as a BETA."
If it were anyone else, I'd agree with you. But if you're the grandson of Russia's richest oligarch, $120 is probably about the real world equivalent of about 3 cents. "Hey, I found this in my ash tray. It can all be yours if you get nekkid and make out with me. Yes, I'm going to post it on The Internet."
If he were doing it because it was the only way he could get women, that would be Heartiste-beta or Vox-gamma.
If he's doing it strictly for the lololololz or as a sadistic social experiment, that's pretty alpha.
When the wife uses sex as a bartering tool in the marriage or when sex become anything other than an end in and of itself......
Alpha bux make Fem'nists clux
He should go to Mardi Gras. How many strings of beads can you get for $120? Of course, he's getting better quality over there, so maybe the price works out.
I like how Russia has oligarchs, but America has....great families and celebrities, I guess.
Gunnar, you're probably right about Grisha's status but Corvinus got the first part right. The only way to keep up the Strong Independent Woman facade is for the exchange to be covert.
Ive known girls who will do a lot more for 120
Christopher B said...
"Gunnar, you're probably right about Grisha's status but Corvinus got the first part right."
Agree to agree.
Peter Gibbons: What would you do if you had a million dollars?
Lawrence: I'll tell you what I'd do, man: two chicks at the same time, man.
Peter Gibbons: That's it? If you had a million dollars, you'd do two chicks at the same time?
Lawrence: Damn straight. I always wanted to do that, man. And I think if I were a millionaire I could hook that up, too; 'cause chicks dig dudes with money.
Peter Gibbons: Well, not all chicks.
Lawrence: Well, the type of chicks that'd double up on a dude like me do.
Big F Feminism is the politics of sexual market losers. It's ironic that for as much as they bleat on about female oppression, the fact is society only takes these sore losers seriously because they are female.
the fact is society only takes these sore losers seriously because they are female.
@Tom
Then there are the male feminists (see Vox Populi)...
If he were doing it because it was the only way he could get women, that would be Heartiste-beta or Vox-gamma.
If he's doing it strictly for the lololololz or as a sadistic social experiment, that's pretty alpha.
@Gunnar von Cowtown
I suppose it could go either way, and that we don't know enough about Grisha to make a call.
However, rich dudes are known for coasting on their wealth to get girls, and by Russian standards, where bribes are a way of life, it strikes me as a rather Anthony Wiener-ish thing to do. Sort of like that "creepshot" fad a while back.
From an Alpha Game article about creepshots:
"For those who are unfamiliar with the term, a creep shot is a photograph taken of an unsuspecting woman, or girl, which is then posted onto social media, blogs and websites with the hashtag #creepshot. They focus on her body – particularly her boobs, bum, legs and any visible underwear. Most of these unsolicited pictures are taken in public – whether at the gym, yoga classes (there’s a whole website dedicated to ‘girls in yoga pants’), or just walking down the street."
So, it's obvious that they don't mind at all being photographed in public. It's obvious that they don't have a philosophical objection to photos of people in public spaces. What really bothers them? The idea that some bottom-feeding male they deems unworthy of their attention might be deriving a modicum of sexual pleasure from their image nevertheless.
That's how much girls hate omegas.
It seems to me that women need the Red Pill far more than men do. Dr. Laura was pointing this out nearly 20 years ago, BTW.
$120 for a flash is a damned ripoff. I had a stripper offer me a blowjob in the parking lot for $40 after I turned down a private dance for $30. (She was really hot too.)
"I have previously made it clear that I vehemently oppose the naked or otherwise sexual filming of people without their consent. Not only is it stupid, considering the consequences of prosecution and conviction for a man, I believe it should be illegal to begin with."
The ROK author is a retard. Public is public and wiretapping laws are moronic. It's so simple: Don't want to be recorded saying or doing "X"? THEN DON'T FUCKING DO "X"! Idiots.
Its uglies or "delta" servitude for me. Its a tough choice lol.
I "know" these women, I relate better to women when I I pay than the traditional route. Its alien to you, but they are looking for cash and I'm looking for some non-ballbreaking fuckin bitch who doesn't care about shit testing me to see if my seed is up to scratch. The whore DOESN'T CARE, in fact the same insecurity that repulses the woman who is checking you out, actually makes the whore know you are not a threat, my nervousness doesn't push her away. In fact if your nice, sometimes, its even a bonus to her. And it can be enjoyable. I bet you 99% of british men who go to "whores" are very polite, its all utterly reasonable, loads of em probably have a laugh. Its sick it is!
How many fuckin dates have I gone on where I just feel I'm getting interviewed for a shite job that I'm going to hate anyway? Its fuckin pointless. Get on the weights, improve your social value, but with the purpose of making women want to fuck you FOR NOTHING. Given you know what a wreck I am I'm sure you can see that the short term "whore" is actually a much happier experience for me. But its still deviant and weak, a stronger "culture" wouldn't approve.
My father is an archetypal delta, my mother ballbreaks him to this day, he does that head shakey thing. But this aint 1968. Being able to build a shed, do all the shit that makes the world go round, counts for what? Make money and get some other "delta" to do it for you, its the fuckin modern way!
"Ironically enough, it's the very women who are most angered by those whose equalitarian policies are to blame for reducing young women to valuing themselves, and being valued, for nothing more than what they bring to the sexual table."
That's why they are angry. They are ashamed at their failure but don't want to face it.
Anyway, based on my study of the teachings of Vox and Heartists, I predict that thanks to those stupid shaming articles, provided Grisha continues demonstrating that he completely doesn't give a shit, not only will women continue going along with this, but now the hottest women will regard it as a major status symbol to strip naked for him for 120$. And furthermore, everyone will begin regarding him as a fun playboy who is great to be around.
For a historical view, I give you Winston Churchill:
“Churchill: "Madam, would you sleep with me for five million pounds?" Socialite: "My goodness, Mr. Churchill... Well, I suppose... we would have to discuss terms, of course... "
Churchill: "Would you sleep with me for five pounds?"
Socialite: "Mr. Churchill, what kind of woman do you think I am?!" Churchill: "Madam, we've already established that. Now we are haggling about the price”
$120 in Moscow will get you 2-3 hours with a 7-9 with a great body. Outside Moscow in the smaller cities it will get you the afternoon, or all night.
Post a Comment
NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.