Thursday, July 28, 2016

Pretty girls prefer Trump



You didn't see this when McCain or Romney were running, did you? That's the difference between putting forward an Alpha and lining up behind a lower-ranked candidate. People respond to Alphas and want to follow them. It's not merely instinctive, it's normal human behavior.

Whether they're being serious or not, whether they are actually Trump supporters or not,, the fact is you would NEVER see this behavior directed, even in jest, at a lower-ranking candidate.

Wednesday, July 27, 2016

The flawless Gamma tell

What is your reaction to being banned from commenting on a site:

  1. Ignore it and keep commenting anyhow.
  2. Shrug and stop commenting there.
  3. Quietly appeal for another chance.
  4. Attack the individual responsible for banning you as a coward, a liar, and a fraud who is scared of you.
For some reason, Gammas always, always, always go for option four. It's remarkable. And I have absolutely no idea what they're thinking. I have no idea what they think they're going to accomplish. 

But if you see someone react poorly to having their commenting privileges limited or removed, you can be certain that you're dealing with a Gamma. Interestingly enough, women tend to behave very much the same way, although they tend to stalk the site much longer than the gammas do.

This might be useful for women attempting to separate the Deltas from the Gammas. Just ask the man if he's ever been banned from a site, or from an organization. If he laughs and shrugs about it, you're fine. If he bursts into tears or spends the next hour complaining about how unfair those terrible, no-good, very bad poeple were and how horribly mistreated he was, you've got a Gamma on your hand.

And if he bursts into an angry recounting of every wrong supposedly done to him over the last ten years, then explains his detailed plans for revenge, run. Then call the police. He's an Omega and he's a ticking time bomb.

Mindset programming

I'm a big believer in mindset programming of the sort Mike Cernovich teaches in his bestselling Gorilla Mindset. I've noticed that when I'm in a good mood, I tend to gravitate towards upbeat techno music, which then tends to enhance and underline that mood. Consider, for example, the lyrics of this club hit from the early 1990s by The Shamen:
I will not fail nor falter, I shall succeed
My perception is altered I do believe
Faith is so strong now nothing shall bar my way
From conviction, no fiction, this is my day

I can move move move any mountain
I can move move move any mountain
I can move move move any mountain

I walk so tall, ascending, I stand so high
Earth below me we both meet above the sky
I feel no fear to be here is oh so fine
Shining brightly like sunlight inside my mind
You literally cannot get more mentally positive than that. Throw in some catchy electronic riffs, a good programmed beat, and some unconscionably cheesy early 90s quasi-raps, and it's no surprise that it was a hit.

But put the cheese aside for the time being and try listening to it when you're going to an important meeting or heading into a difficult situation. I guarantee you'll walk in there feeling as if you unexpectedly find yourself meeting with a tiger, you'll just rip its balls off and stuff them down its throat.

Mood is momentary, but mindset is a choice. Learn to program the latter and you'll soon find yourself able to alter the former. And notice how the message is the direct opposite of the despairing, discouraging one that so many people have on autoplay in their minds. And the key to it all is the first part of the third line of the second verse: I feel no fear.

Tuesday, July 26, 2016

The eyes have it


Look at the the look in the white girls' eyes as they take in the invaders in their burqahs. They know. For all the moral posturing and the virtue-signaling about diversity and vibrancy and multiculturalism they will parrot, they know. And they are afraid.

They are waiting for men to defend and protect them. But they will not respond to you until you demonstrate that you will stand up for the West, that you will stand up for them and their children.

Monday, July 25, 2016

The motivations of a mudshark

A woman wonders why some white women subject themselves to the social rejection that inevitably accompanies mudsharking:
A young brunette and a dark-skinned man are strolling about downtown on a nice evening, looking idly into the storefront windows they walk past. It’s not what you think. I was meeting up for drinks with a group of coworkers and as it happened, most of us were running late except the above-mentioned brunette and the Black coworker of mine, who were not a couple. To kill time while waiting for the rest of the group, they walked around for a bit. Later, she described to me the shock of noticing people’s reactions to the sight of them as a presumed couple. She said that she’s never experienced that before: every person she passed either gave her dagger-looks or froze her out. “How can somebody choose to live that way?” she asked.
The question of whether the motivation for mudsharking is eugenic or psychological tends to depend upon the attractiveness of the woman involved. My feeling is that it largely depends upon the age and attractiveness of the woman involved.

The older and less attractive a woman is, the more likely it is that her motivation is essentially eugenic; she's trading down in race in order to trade up in fitness. A fat, 35-year-old white woman is going to be able to attract a much more physically fit and younger man if she goes black, after all, even though it means she is probably going to bear the financial burden for her children. That's an easily understood choice, particularly for the sort of low-IQ, short-time-preferenced women one sees choosing that option.

The younger a woman is, the more naive and malleable she is. She is highly aware of the drama that "breaking the taboo" will create, and all the attention it will draw, but she is unaware of, or at the very least, does not believe in, the heavy social price that she will pay over time. And why should she, when the media is constantly telling her that she is cool and morally superior and progressive, and even her parents are afraid to tell her the truth? Also, young girls are much more likely to be susceptible to the more aggressive "yeah, come on baby" low-IQ African forms of courtship than more experienced women, who find them ridiculous and repellent.

The more attractive the woman is, the more options she has. So, the attractive woman's decision to mudshark is much more likely to be purposeful, and therefore pathological in nature, unless she is quite young. The exception, of course, being the attractive white women who get involved with wealthy black celebrities, in which case they are usually just ruthless fame whores who didn't happen to land a white celebrity.

I saw a pair of mudsharks a few months ago, one with children, one without. They were the only two Europeans who were in the small African group at a town festival; the short, overweight mother looked downright depressed while the other woman, an attractive, but heavily tattooed blonde, was carrying herself in an extremely aggressive manner and was obviously hyperaware of the fact that people were looking at her in disapproval.

I could only conclude that some women are so desperate to stand out that they prefer social rejection and open contempt to the moderate amount of attention that their looks would otherwise command.

I very much doubt there are any studies available, but I hypothesize that mudsharks have much higher rates of divorce than women who do not miscegenate regardless of whether they eventually marry a man of their own race or not. It's even possible that the 100 percent higher rate of WF-BM divorce is not primarily a consequence of the interracial nature of the marriage or the higher rate of black infidelity, but rather, the psychologically problematic nature of the mudshark.

Sunday, July 24, 2016

Big data and sexual attraction

This isn't new to readers of this blog, but it's factual data about dating worth underlining in the face of all the myths about interracial dating that are propagated by the media and the advertising industry:
5. According to Rudder’s research, Asian men are the least desirable racial group to women…

On OkCupid, users can rate each other on a 1 to 5 scale. While Asian women are more likely to give Asian men higher ratings, women of other races—black, Latina, white—give Asian men a rating between 1 and 2 stars less than what they usually rate men. Black and Latin men face similar discrimination from women of different respective races, while white men’s ratings remain mostly high among women of all races.

6. …And black women are the least desirable racial group to men.

Pretty much the same story. Asian, Latin and white men tend to give black women 1 to 1.5 stars less, while black men’s ratings of black women are more consistent with their ratings of all races of women. But women who are Asian and Latina receive higher ratings from all men—in some cases, even more so than white women.
So, if you're a white man, stop feeling down about yourself. You hit the lottery, attraction-wise. If you have a problem attracting women, the problem is not your race, but with some other aspect of your personality or presentation.

The data clearly indicates that both white men and white women trade on their racial attractional advantage to date more attractive individuals of races considered less attractive. Of course, this means that their children will likely suffer an even greater penalty, which is why both men and women are right to be wary of those who date outside their race as it tends to indicate narcissism, commitment-avoidance, or short time preferences, and quite possibly all three.

Saturday, July 23, 2016

Gamma is real and material

I've been noticing more and more gammas since Trump. "Everybody is stupid and I'm a genius. Why won't anybody listen to my genius?"
 - Bullit315

Love the unfalsifiable system you got going here. Everyone you don't like is or will become "gamma", by the time your rationalization is over. 
- Tarrou

Contrast these two contradictory ideas. One is that gamma behavior is defined, identifiable, widespread, and recognizable. The other is that gamma behavior is unfalsifiable and is solely defined by my personal dislikes. Both statements cannot be true; the irony, of course, is that  in his passive-aggressive language, Tarrou shows signs of the very behavior that he implicitly claims is impossible to recognize.

But the fact is that gammas are real, their behavior is both identifiable and predictable, and their existence has nothing to do with my likes and dislikes. In fact, in my personal life, I tend to have the most problems with Alphas, who erroneously view my Sigma self-confidence as a challenge to their place at the top of the social hierarchy and often react badly to me. I have very little real-world contact with Gammas, as I don't like them and their social rank is too low for them to be often present in my social circles.

Online is a different story, as it is Gammas who tend to make up the vast majority of persistent problem commenters on this and every other blog on the Internet. I can provide a new example almost every single day; here is one from just this morning courtesy of a previously banned Gamma commenter at Vox Popoli.

But first, some context. Aaron had been banned from VP for more than a few weeks, possibly even a few months now. I don't recall why, but his behavior was egregious enough to land him on the programmed autovanish list. He waited until he perceived I had made a mistake, then leaped to take advantage of it, leaving no less than 7 comments despite all of them being autovanished.

Once he belatedly realized that no one was seeing them, he left these two additional comments on two different posts, one of which had nothing to do with the subject he had nominally been addressing.
You can dish it out but u can't take it, eh Vox? Classic :) I know your type very well....drone on and on about being Alpha but are cowards in the end....always the same
- Aaron

I was waiting for u to ban me....I'm a little bit too effective for you eh Vox? I dont blame u, u are a weak man after power, and I undermine your power... Well, this will be our little secret. Your dumb as fuck followers won't know a thing.
- Aaron
Now, the significant thing about these two comments is that they are, almost word for word, very much the same as every other Gamma who has been banned or spammed on either VP or AG over the years. We're talking about dozens of individuals who are totally unrelated except for their similar behaviors. The accusations of cowardice, the obsession with power, the assertion that he knew it was coming, the contempt for everyone else who didn't rise up and join his one-man revolution against me, the posturing about being too strong, too smart, too effective, too something to be permitted to remain active in the community, all of these things are standard Gamma responses. Even the weird spelling and capitalization is par for the course.

The only thing that is missing from Aaron's reaction is the feigning of enjoyment, the "LOL", and the various claims of how the Gamma finds it "hilarious" or "so funny" to be kicked out.

Now, I didn't create this pattern of behavior. I didn't define it. I merely recognized it and labeled it. And once you recognize it, you can't unsee it, but will see it everywhere you go. That's because Gamma is real, it is a normal category of male sociosexuality. It's not merely an insult or an invented name to call someone in order to get a rise out of them.

Gamma is not even intrinsically bad, it simply is, and wishing it away or pretending it doesn't exist will not change anything. In fact, the very worst thing for a Gamma male is for him to pretend that it does not exist, because until he accepts the fact of its existence, accepts that the psychological profile fits him, and accepts that his behavior conforms to certain recognizable patterns, it is very difficult for him to even begin to do anything to surmount it and raise his social status.