When A tolerates B, but B does not tolerate A, then B will eventually crush A out of existence.
In the beginning they just want a place at the table. In the end, they own the table and ban everyone else from it, unless they agree to (at least nominally) support the social justice cult. Which is why you cannot let them in. Ever.
When A tolerates B, but B does not tolerate A, then B will eventually crush A out of existence.
That assumes A's tolerance is perpetual. Most people eventually tire of that and will push back, hard. That is what we are seeing in many areas of society now.
That is why the true Gospel converts hearts, not forces actions, contrary to the preaching of some. These people are just modern day Pharisees of a very corrupt religion.
It isn't SJW's call to change games and the definition of gamers. If they do, it won't matter. It is clear to me that gamers is a term that has a specific meaning that only gamers identify with. The regular public don't care. I am not a gamer so I don't care. I wonder of feminists will actually adopt gamers. Feminists often go back to their own naming convention and they love to adopt shaming words as their own like slut. There is no shame in gamers or being one.
I recall a corollary. Didn't feminists actively avoided the male term "man"? They often said pronouns like "he" is not inclusive. They then want to change words like chairman into chairperson. They dislike "manual" because it has man in it. How will they turn a word like gamer, which is applied mainly towards male hardcore gamers? If women won't become one, it defeats the objective.
For gamers to mean femnist, it means the opposite... women non-gamers or women casual gamers.
It isn't SJW's call to change games and the definition of gamers.
Since when has that stopped them? It didn't stop them with the word "family", it hasn't stopped them with the word "marriage", it's not even stopping them with the words "man" and "woman".
So what makes you think that the mere concept of "not their call" would stop them from doing anything?
I'm guessing SparklePunter did something really really bad to a woman or women sometime in the past and his strange amplified hyper white knighting is his way of repenting. He projects his inner sickness onto normal white males in order to make himself feel less sick inside. He clearly hates himself.
"I'm guessing SparklePunter did something really really bad to a woman" Either that or hes desperately trying to get girls to compensate for being raped in the Vikings Locker room.
What? When I think of gamers, my brain should ping with F'ism, a failed hideous work view? GTFrickOut!!
Nein and never. F'ism rarely occurs to me unless I read or see it play out and its never pretty! My response is usually ,"will the deceived ever wake up, eh, probably not, better give em' more dope to OD on."
23 comments:
I cannot believe that a faggot like Sparklepunter could ever find employment in the NFL.
You can't believe he worked for the company famous for Pinktober? Feminism is a cancer, and Kluwe is a carcinogen.
I think we should use the metaphorical guts of the SJW's to grease our tanks.
I think we should use the metaphorical guts of the SJW's to grease our tanks.
GLWT, they have no guts.
"You can't believe he worked for the company famous for Pinktober?"
He didn't work in the NFL front office. He actually played.
Do the guys who play actually look like they give a hoot about Pinktober?
Hard to say who/if/how much they care, but given the recent NFL players SJW commercial campaign ("No more domestic violence blah blah blah....) ad....
It's difficult for me to understand the thinking of a pussy (@ChrisWarcraft) like that.
Politics. Add it to anything pure then boom. It becomes dirty. smh
By the way do you want to follow each other?
Kindly leave a comment on my blog and I'll instantly follow you back.
Thanks much dear! :) -
Korean Online Shopping
If I were a player I would have to add "And I love Big Brother" to the end of my lines. Then refuse to re-shoot.
M M..
.... such a play assumes that NFL players are literate....and there lies the problem.
Sparklepunter should do a "No More" ad, wearing the child rape shorts he wore for the Vikings.
Feminism and gaming? Hey, who am I to judge. I, personally, make just about this much room for the combo.
When A tolerates B, but B does not tolerate A, then B will eventually crush A out of existence.
In the beginning they just want a place at the table. In the end, they own the table and ban everyone else from it, unless they agree to (at least nominally) support the social justice cult. Which is why you cannot let them in. Ever.
SJW -- not even once.
When A tolerates B, but B does not tolerate A, then B will eventually crush A out of existence.
That assumes A's tolerance is perpetual. Most people eventually tire of that and will push back, hard. That is what we are seeing in many areas of society now.
That is why the true Gospel converts hearts, not forces actions, contrary to the preaching of some. These people are just modern day Pharisees of a very corrupt religion.
It isn't SJW's call to change games and the definition of gamers. If they do, it won't matter. It is clear to me that gamers is a term that has a specific meaning that only gamers identify with. The regular public don't care. I am not a gamer so I don't care. I wonder of feminists will actually adopt gamers. Feminists often go back to their own naming convention and they love to adopt shaming words as their own like slut. There is no shame in gamers or being one.
I recall a corollary. Didn't feminists actively avoided the male term "man"? They often said pronouns like "he" is not inclusive. They then want to change words like chairman into chairperson. They dislike "manual" because it has man in it. How will they turn a word like gamer, which is applied mainly towards male hardcore gamers? If women won't become one, it defeats the objective.
For gamers to mean femnist, it means the opposite... women non-gamers or women casual gamers.
It isn't SJW's call to change games and the definition of gamers.
Since when has that stopped them? It didn't stop them with the word "family", it hasn't stopped them with the word "marriage", it's not even stopping them with the words "man" and "woman".
So what makes you think that the mere concept of "not their call" would stop them from doing anything?
They do call it same-sex or gay marriage.
@jimmy-jimbo
How will they turn a word like gamer, which is applied mainly towards male hardcore gamers? If women won't become one, it defeats the objective.
The objective is to get you chasing your own tail, not to change the language. These people are acting in bad faith.
I'm guessing SparklePunter did something really really bad to a woman or women sometime in the past and his strange amplified hyper white knighting is his way of repenting. He projects his inner sickness onto normal white males in order to make himself feel less sick inside. He clearly hates himself.
"I'm guessing SparklePunter did something really really bad to a woman" Either that or hes desperately trying to get girls to compensate for being raped in the Vikings Locker room.
Keep your ovaries off our keyboard.
What? When I think of gamers, my brain should ping with F'ism, a failed hideous work view? GTFrickOut!!
Nein and never. F'ism rarely occurs to me unless I read or see it play out and its never pretty! My response is usually ,"will the deceived ever wake up, eh, probably not, better give em' more dope to OD on."
Post a Comment
NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.