Friday, May 23, 2014

Hypergamy in the kitchen

One of the many reasons that women in the workforce tend to create problems that would not otherwise be there: it is normal for women to become attracted to their male superiors. It also puts a revised perspective on so-called sexual harassment:
Does the gender of your boss make a difference?

I can’t speak for other women, but for me, having a female boss and male boss is very different. I tend to develop crushes on my bosses. It’s like there’s a need for approval from any male boss, like wanting their 100 percent approval. But if it’s a female boss, I’m usually thinking, Do you have respect for my work ethic? I would work just as hard and give it my all for a man or a woman, but I guess I always end up fantasizing about any of my male bosses.
Women naturally respond in a sexual manner to a man who is in a dominant position over them. This doesn't mean they will act on their instincts, but it needs to be recognized that the instinctive response is there in order for it to be managed effectively by all the relevant parties.

14 comments:

Dark Herald said...

One of the biggest ass aches I had in the Marine Corps was feminine hypergamy. Its perfectly legal for Lance Corporals and below (E-3 to E-1) to date. Of course female Marines were never interested in E-3 and below. They invariably wanted their Sergeants. Which was illeagal but that was universally ignored.

The problem was that female Marines would get into cat fights as instinctively as lemmings jumps of cliff. And then they would get their sergeant boyfriends involved. Now I've got two idiots indulging in mate guarding. Now the matter can'be ignored. Now the command would have no choice and I would have two corporals where I used to have two sergeants.

Military men in general have no concept of game, (witness the cringe worthy fall of David Petraeus). Few men need it more. And I suspect it would be viewed as a chargeable offense to teach it to them.

Stg58/Animal Mother said...

Cataline Sergius,

DON'T EVEN GET ME STARTED.

Anonymous said...

Jeremiah says:
seconded.... I came from the CAV to army reserve intel and OMG, what a massive shitstorm...

Christopher B said...

Validation that sexual harrasment laws were designed by by women of low SMV to punish men for the sins of women with high SMV.

Trust said...

This is another reason most sex scandals involve male bosses or politicians. Men don't have the urge to go down on women three times their age just bc they are famous and powerful.

Unknown said...

Sexual harassment laws are used by lower-class women to attack higher-class men who aren't interested in them. "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned."

Ron said...

@Cataline Sergius

This is probably an obvious question. Do you think teaching military men the concepts of game would help them in defeating their opponents?

And a second question, do you think that if military men understood game it would be harder or easier to get things done properly using the corporate/hierarchical structure of the military?

Third question, do you think that US military men, having gone through whatever training and indoctrination they've gone through, good or bad, would have an easier time or a harder time learning and implementing game concepts.

Final question: if you wanted to reach the millions of armed servicemen with these concepts of game, what would be the best and most effective way to get this message out? Is there a particular blog that military men in particular read, or a particular show, or a particular youtube channel a lot of them tune into?


hank.jim said...

I guess there's new meaning to heat in the kitchen.

insanitybytes22 said...

"Women naturally respond in a sexual manner to a man who is in a dominant position over them."

Fair enough, but what so many today seem to worry about, used to be such a pleasant and playful banter between the sexes. It's really a shame that we are no longer allowed to relax around each other, to joke, to kid, and to make our work more enjoyable. When I used to work in the restaurant, sexual harassment didn't even exist in our world. The whole idea was ridiculous, men simply never crossed the line and if they ever tried, other men were quick to reign them in. There was also a great deal of forgiveness and tolerance, perhaps we'd roll our eyes at each other's antics, but it was immediately forgotten.

Dexter said...

There's a book called "The Unforgiving Minute". The author is an Army Ranger, combat veteran, leader of men, etc. But the parts of his memoir in which he describes his relationship with his girlfriend are nauseatingly beta.

My suspicion is that the military still indoctrinates its men with the old "code of chivalry" bullshit -- even as they are indoctrinating them that Women Are Just As Capable As Men.

"Sexual harassment laws are used by lower-class women to attack higher-class men who aren't interested in them. "

Disagree. They are used by high-class women to deter and punish non-alpha suitors.

Lower-class women get nowhere with such lawsuits. Higher-class women don't file them against men to whom they're attracted.

Retrenched said...

Women are drawn to dominant, powerful men, just as men are drawn to young, fertile women.

It is what it is, and no amount of social engineering or egalitarian propaganda will ever change it.

You can deny reality -- hell, you can even make it illegal to point out what reality is by calling it 'sexist hate speech' or whatever. But you can never, ever, ever make it false.

Stg58/Animal Mother said...

It is hard to be Alpha in the military for most people. You are required to take on Beta characteristics because so many people outrank/outAlpha you. A private is a peon. Once you hit Corporal you can flex your muscles in a very limited way. Sergeants are like High School QB's, or have the potential to be. The SNCO's (Staff Sergants and up) can act as sugar daddies/dirty old men, but all of these types have to answer to someone who is more alpha than you can be simply based on your rank. Officers aren't in the equation, if only to be a young female Army lieutenant or Navy Ensign (preferred target) in peak physical condition being pursued in a bar in Fleet Week by testosterone fueled sergeants.

Dark Herald said...

@Some Dude

...Do you think teaching military men the concepts of game would help them in defeating their opponents?

I can't speak for the other services. The Marine Corps already teaches some aspects in terms of "Frame," Though we call it something else. Look up OODA Loop.

...do you think that if military men understood game it would be harder or easier to get things done properly using the corporate/hierarchical structure of the military?

In the Marines, to quote our most beloved commandant General Lejeunne the relationship between leader and subordinate should partake of the nature of the relation between father and son, to the extent that officers, especially commanding officers, are responsible for the physical, mental, and moral welfare... For some kids in bootcamp a Drill Instructor is the first father figure they have ever had. The Senior DI is a tough daddy but he's daddy. Alpha mannerism are impressed on recruits for the next three months. Recruits by the beginning of the fourth week are frequently doing impersonations of their DIs because they've been "impressed" psychologically speaking

Honestly it's just women we don't as an institution "get". Blue Pill myths about women prevail at all levels and at every rank. White Knighting is keenly encouraged. That being one of the biggest obstacles to teaching Game in the military. The original purpose of White Knighting, to protect girls from their own base desires has been completely forgotten.

Fifty years ago the purpose of White Knighting was very real with regards to Women Marines. They were completely segregated and locked away in their own barracks that was literally a "No-Man's Land." It was understood by everyone that the men weren't being locked out, the women were being locked in. This was in a world before the pill and it was taken for granted there would be a ninety percent pregnancy rate.

The forms of chivalry are maintained and encouraged but the original purpose has been completely lost. What's left has been repurposed to support the Blue Pill Myths. Exercise of chivalry is now the cruelest illusion, a mirage of higher SMV.


Third question, do you think that US military men, having gone through whatever training and indoctrination they've gone through, good or bad, would have an easier time or a harder time learning and implementing game concepts.

Not without some difficulty. First the male to female ratio in the Marine corps is 98 to 2. Second, and this is just my opinion, game is best taught as an apprenticeship.

Final question: if you wanted to reach the millions of armed servicemen with these concepts of game, what would be the best and most effective way to get this message out? Is there a particular blog that military men in particular read, or a particular show, or a particular youtube channel a lot of them tune into?

Let me preface this by saying I am now out of the loop but I can make a few guesses. Any official web site would either be DOD controlled or if civilian instantly be blocked and made off limits. Networking through social media to junior Staff NCOs might be the best bet. Platoon sergeants train both sergeants and Second Lieutenants.

For further reading start here.

Ron said...

@Cataline Sergius

I first heard of OODA when I read a biography of John Boyd. I always wanted to learn how to use it, but ...

Thanks

Post a Comment

NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.