Thursday, June 1, 2017

Why young men prefer porn and vidya

It's not really a great mystery why it's becoming harder and harder to interest young men in women at all, never mind marriage.
A SURVEY of 1,000 women has found that the majority prefer reading a book or knitting to having SEX."

The poll of women aged between 18-50 found that 18 per cent of women would rather do a 'craft activity' like knitting, sewing, painting or card-making instead of romping with their partner.
Asked to pick from a range of 'options' if they were given a spare moment to relax, women chose reading a good book as their 'top option', trumping sex, crafting or having a bath.

The top four options chosen by women in the poll released today were:

1 - Read a book - 37 per cent

2 - Have a bath - 26 per cent

3 - Crafting (Knitting, sewing etc) - 18 per cent

4 - Have sex - 8 per cent
What, exactly, would be the point of marrying a woman who would rather knit or read than have sex? No wonder more and more young men are deciding that they'd prefer other activities themselves.

29 comments:

Solaire Of Astora said...

Gee, I wonder what amazing books they're spending their time reading. Women must be so erudite.

DeploraBard said...

50 shades of particle physics

Wanderer said...

Also the average girl today is fat (and proud), is covered in tattoos, has short hair, talks and dresses like a man, had at least one abortion, and wouldn't know how to be feminine if her life depended on it. She brings nothing to the table besides a gaped out vag, rapidly vanishing youth, a college degree in post-structuralist African basket-weaving, and $60,000 student loan debt for you to help her with.

Dexter said...

That's "have sex with current partner" not "have sex with Brad Pitt" of course. She might put the book down for Brad...

Matamoros said...

Asked a steady girl once, "ready"? Her answer, "I'm always ready." A lot of fun that one.

Aurini said...

Pretty sure 1 and 2 are metaphors for masturbation. But don't look at that pr0n, boys.

Matt said...

They're lying.

VFM #7634 said...

That's "have sex with current partner" not "have sex with Brad Pitt" of course.

@Dexter
There's the rub, eh? As we might suspect, landwhale/Gamma couples aren't immune to lesbian bed death.

Rabbi B said...

I must confess that I am truly mystified.

Randy M said...

They found 180 women with a tangible skill? Well that's something at least.

Ron said...

First off, just read SJWAL and guys, when he says you should read it, READ IT.

That said, I take issue with the conclusion of this post. But before I make my case a disqualifier: I have zero experience with women, and anything I say is a product of study from people like vox and observation.

Given the axiom that Women reflect the emotions a man feels, one (must?) conclide that female emption os externally based. That is, she can have a terrible day, but if you joke and badboy her out of it she'll forget all pf that and be willing to get "it" on. Similarly, she can be ready to go at a moment, but if her mind is occupied by stress, then she will turn off.

The second axiom is that women dont know what they want.

Combining the above two well established axioms, I can say that the answers given depended more on the time our female froends were asked this rather than a respojse based on an impartial averaging of the days desires. Ie, if she is in the middle of stressing over a test or on her way to work, at that moment she'd prefer nothing so mich as to play with a ball of yarn.

There is a third, somewhat controversial axiom, and that is that women cannot comminicate necessary information in a way that single wavelength males are going to make sense of. Rather, whether by layered inuendo, or using a somewhat differently understood vocabulary, whose words are understopd to have added information among her circle of friends, or whether by body language and vocal tonality as well as speed and rhtyhm, they impart dofferent layers pf meaning to the same phrase. Ie, "really?" As opposed to "reeeallly??" Or "really."

Therefore comboning axioms 1+3 I would say they would "rather do knitting than have mediocre sex with the limp wristed beta boys or neurotic lesbians that are reasonably available for copulation

Said with a grain of salt.

Stg58/Animal Mother said...

He said comboning.

OGRE said...

shut up, beavis

Kallmunz said...

More and more young women are declaring "It's my body," and more young men are replying "you can keep it."

dc.sunsets said...

The survey was conducted during the intermission of the touring company putting on The Vagina Monologues.

Do men just pick whatever is on the shelf, or set their sights on the best proffered?

RM Chris said...

"...'have sex with current partner' not 'have sex with Brad Pitt" of course.'"

Indeed.

Given the war on men over the last 50 years, we've been taught to be weaker, less masculine, have less game, be less fit - Basically the opposite of being men.

No wonder a majority of women would rather read a book/emotional porn tract or diddle around with arts & crafts.

Rex Little said...

This is nothing new, at all. Sex has never been a priority for women; not now, not 100 years ago, not for Eve. Sure, there are exceptions--women who would rather have sex than do anything else. These are known as nymphomaniacs.

Ransom Smith said...

I honestly don't get it.

Hmmm, logic and reasoning would seem to dictate the decades long trope of men being bad at making women climax to be at least partially at fault.

(I remember the awkward conversation with my dad about that when I got married. Still makes me chuckle )

I'd imagine as well a lack of interest in children is at fault. As there's only one way to have babies.

The easiest fix seems to be for men to deny women sex. We can hold the cards if we choose. Control the thirst and make them play the game as it was intended.

((( bob kek mando ))) - ( Give us this day our daily bait, that we may crush our enemies, see their weaksauce driven before us and hear the lamentations of their women, thank you Baby Jesus, Amen ) said...

to be fair, "reading a book" translates to something like 50 Shades ... so that masturbation material is kind of satisfying her sexual urges.

Mountain Man said...

Not surprising. For a ZFG type of guy the current sociosexual climate is a poosy paradise.
Out of the 92 % that are " not interested” - 40 % are decent looking, fit and wanting to f*ck, just not with the beta-schlubs that she is surrounded by.
When I last played the field I was blown away by the number of hot/cute girls who were willing to settle for FWB..despite claiming in the beginning that they really weren’t into ONS or “casual hookups”
For a guy who just goes for what he wants, not caring one bit about her fickle emotions, he will literally find the women begging to get bent over by him any time - any way.

Mordakei Silberreich said...

Sexrobots that can cook, clean and have sex with you are going to be better.

Mike C said...

The poll of women aged between 18-50 found that 18 per cent of women would rather do a 'craft activity' like knitting, sewing, painting or card-making instead of romping with their partner

Would be interesting a D more useful to see this broken out by say 18-35 and 35-50. My sense is younger women are more interested in sex but as women enter perimenopause and menopause their desire for sex plummets except for infrequent validation purposes

OGRE said...

"Sexrobots that can cook, clean and have sex with you are going to be better."

Thats fucking absurd. Theres no way a robot can cook better than me.

Purge187 said...

"Sexrobots that can cook, clean and have sex with you are going to be better."

Some of the more prominent members of La Feminista are flipping out over them, even though they're barely off the assembly line. Men are getting more "alternatives," and the monopoly on sex that women have is fading.

Rex Little said...

Real women--even feminists--shouldn't worry about sexbots. The men using those will be the ones that women don't want bothering them anyway. The women who should worry are prostitutes. What can a hooker offer that a good sexbot, with the right look and feel, can't?

dvdivx said...

I won't forget a group of about 10 young women and 3 men. All the women were white and there were 2 blacks and one white for the men all were pedaling a large bike type thing except the blacks. At some point no matter how "alpha" you are being around a group of whores is really not alpha. If alpha just means getting g laid then that's a cad, whoremonger, or other terms none of which build a society. I'd rather be around someone that calls I like it is and won't put up with crap while the world is burning around them.

Tatooine Sharpshooters' Club said...

"A SURVEY of 1,000 women" "aged between 18-50"

That's a pool of responses that's both broad and shallow. Why would we believe this poll anymore than the other skewed garbage pollsters put out? Oh look, we find the agenda: "The article mentions that women's stress has rocketed because of Brexit and Trump's election." Color me shocked.

That said, cock carouseling has drastically reduced the perceived value of pussy, and yet the boys aren't buying it anymore. Once again, our ancestors and their fierce restrictions on female sexual profligacy are proven correct.

camillacameo said...

I don't understand the condemnatory nature of these posts about women having lower sex drives than men. I thought that was traditionally a given and one of the reasons for the sexual double standard favoring men. If these women are married, then it's bad they don't want to have sex. But if they're not married, then it's good. Female promiscuity is especially dyscivic.

I'm not married, so I never have sex. If I were married, I'd do so whenever my husband wanted. That's all there is to it. I think I'm probably missing the point, but like I said, I don't understand.

Tatooine Sharpshooters' Club said...

The sexual "double standard" favors men because sexual selectivity is a female prerogative, ergo having many partners as a women is no achievement, while having many partners is indicative of a man higher in the SSH. Lower sex drive is irrelevant.

The current sexuakl marketplace also indicates that, removal of many inhibitions, especially social stigmas, have lead to a great increase in dyscivic female promiscuity. Again, lower sex drive in females is mostly irrelevant.

The story is relating the attitudes of women with partners who are not interested in sex, certainly not "whenever my husband wanted".

Post a Comment

NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.