Roosh experiences relationships

It doesn't sound like it went all that well. But the behavior he describes are a pretty standard set, even if there is a pretty steep gradient from the best women to the worst:

Women will hold you to a standard, at the threat of dumping you if you break it, when she herself is not holding that standard. They do the very things they wouldn’t want you doing, and rationalize it by saying they what she’s doing is actually different, when in all likelihood it’s even worse. They remember every thing you said, even from years ago, but can’t see a behavior they did just last week that contradicts her standards for you.

Women have no objective standard or morality, and thus no way to identify if they are right or wrong about anything. Instead, they use pure emotion to guide their behavior. If they feel good then it must be just. If they feel bad then it must not be. Since emotions can twist the perception of any event, she will simply do what she wants to do and find an emotional path or false strain of logic to convince her it was right.

The most amazing behavior I’ve seen in women is denying something that you caught them doing. You can show them evidence, right to their face, and they will deny it, and then find a way to blame you for it. I have been warned about this before, but was skeptical until I experienced myself. She is such an unreliable “witness” to her own behavior that there may be no point to ever getting an explanation from her about anything. If you don’t know the facts about something, and need her side of the story to get the facts, you’ll never get the facts.

This is the other side of the "she makes me a better man" coin. Have you ever noticed that you never hear women talking about how a man makes her a better woman? That's because women don't permit men to hold them to standards, let alone the same standards they set for men.

This can't truly be considered hypocrisy, however, because that would imply the woman is fully aware of the double standard involved. It's best understood, and accepted, as an implicit double standard that tends to work in the female favor, just as the sexual double standard tends to work in the male favor. It's the way things are, so don't expect them to be otherwise in any male-female relationship.

Of course, if you've got a good memory, or are in the habit of writing things down, it can occasionally be amusing to see how sincerely they will tell you something that is absolutely 180 degrees opposite from something they told you every bit as credibly the previous time. And, as Roosh says, if you successfully call them on it, they will attempt to blame you for having had the sense to keep track of their ever-mutating stories. So, there is little point in doing so; it's usually better to let them think they have successfully defined reality for you.

The key is to grasp that, to the normal woman, it is the emotional truth of the now that is most relevant. After that is the acceptance by others of that emotional truth; the actual facts are tertiary at best.

If you are a man who loves women, you simply have to accept them as they are. They are not going to magically change their essence according to your preferences, and their dynamism is part of their charm.