Friday, October 21, 2016

The Attraction Irony

The hallmark of a broken society: many women will now respond better to male infidelity than to male fidelity.
Most men in this part of the world won’t so much as verbally disagree with his female or even raise his voice at her. Men like this are fearful of the proverbial shit storm they’re sure will ensue if they upset the applecart. For this reason they live in a perpetual state of discontentment caused by this fear.

A man in a relationship where he’s afraid to check his woman for any reason will lose the single most important element in in keeping her loyal: respect. A woman cannot love a man she does not respect. It can’t be done. And if a man doesn’t have any backbone, his woman can’t respect him let alone love him.

According to women, two of the worst things a man can do to a woman within the context of a sexual relationship is physical abuse, and infidelity. But knowing what we know about women tells us that that these two ‘crimes’ keep them around a hell of a lot longer than the opposites.
It does make sense, in a sick sort of way. The man who cheats obviously commands interest from other women, whereas even the most desirable man can be dismissed as unable to attract interest from other women if he is resolutely faithful.

From a strictly hypergamous perspective, the unfaithful man is more sexually attractive than the faithful man, by definition. Traditional women are taught to control their hypergamous urges, just as traditional men are taught to control their promiscuous urges, but then, increasingly few men and women have been taught to deny themselves anything these days.

31 comments:

liberranter said...

Amen.

FALPhil said...

I think cultural tradition and morality may have some impact on this. Of course, we have lost a good deal of that in the West.

RmaxGenactivePUA Mgtow said...

If you need an entire society to control womens promiscuity, then it is unbiological & doomed to failure.

The more biologically correct a society, the more likely it is to succeed.

True traditionalism has been overtaken by pagan catholic satanic puritanism, which demonises male sexuality, while it enslaves women into monogamous marriage. With no other women to compete against, women turn against their husband & their families.

Women are designed to be in harems, men are designed to run harems.

Men are supposed to be tribal. Monogamous marriage merely divides men from being a united cohesive tribe of men, into divided as a family, where no man gives a shit about another unless he's part of another family.

Marriage was the greatest con foisted upon the tribe of man, designed to divide instead of unite them, by the NWO religion of nimrod & akhenaton, the pagan catholic church.

bob kek mando ( Grab 'Em By The Pussy And Their Hearts And Minds Will Follow ) said...

women always want that which they do not have ... no matter how good what they have is.

praetorian said...

pagan catholic satanic puritanism

Congrats. That is nearly the dumbest thing I have read on the internet this week, and the internet has been in fighting form lately.

If you are just trolling, excellent work sir.

Johnny said...

One way of thinking about modern enforced pair bonding, when it is enforced, is that it is an adjustment to modern conditions. The reality that us men are supposed to be out killing each other off in tribal warfare, and because we are not there is a surplus supply. The adjustment then is to ration out the available females.

VFM #7634 said...

@RmaxGenactivePUA Mgtow

You might argue that Muslims and Africans are the model for human society, and while they may be demographically winning right now, I'd say that their highly degraded "societies" are the closest thing to living in hell that can be imagined. I think I'll pass.

Allen Ayler said...

What a load of shit. This is full of inaccurate pseudo intellectual mumbo jumbo. Completely false. Either show some fort of statistics or cite the source for the claim that "most men do not raise their voice or disagree with their female counter part," or just give it up. I read part of your new best selling book, too. It's all the same pseudo intellectual biased generalizing jumbo. Please post my email so people can know how full of shit you are. You are CERTAINLY NOT an alpha. But you call yourself "big dog" and people who are trying to selflessly volunteer their professional services and the time they don't have a "diva ego."

Jehu said...

The natural ground state of humanity sucks. It creates a low trust tribal society where more energy is spent in negative sum transactions than positive sum ones. Monogamy is a social technology and requires society to spend energy to maintain it. Were it implemented in a game like civilization, it would be screamed at as 'overpowered' in all the forums constantly, as any society with normative monogamy will kick the snot out of any society without it in warfare, if the odds are even vaguely resembling equal. Monogamy with patriarchy gives you pervasive buy-in to your society from your 20th-80th percentile males, and that is part of the secret sauce of the West.

Allen Ayler said...

MUMBO JUMBO DRIVEN BY AN EGOTISTICAL PSEUDO INTELLECTUAL

Tom said...

Moran's on paraid, moran's on paraid, hi ho da dairyo, theirs moran's on paraid.

Dude, the parts with the larger margins and narrower text are a quote from someone else. Also VD doesn't claim to be an Alpha. He says he's a Sigma.

You got one thing right though. He's totally full of excrement, at least 10% of which is Parmesan Reggiano and red wine dregs.

liberranter said...

Hey, Vox, it looks lke you have a new Gamma admirer!

VFM #7634 said...

@Allen Ayler

Butthurt much?

Back before I knew Game (aside from the extroverted David DeAngelo stuff which didn't work too well for me), I tried Gamma behavior several years ago as an experiment, because that's what society told me worked. Went over like a lead balloon. Completely turned them off. That was the major clue that led me to finding Game, specifically Heartiste and Vox, which, it turns out, works.

And yet here you come butting in asserting that it's "completely false", and demanding sources.

Somehow I suspect you're a Gamma yourself.

Maybe you should, perhaps, try Game... you know, as an experiment?

VFM #7634 said...

@liberranter

Make that two new Gamma admirers.

Jehu said...

It seems silly to argue about Vox's sociosexual status. I've got a rule that cuts through an awful lot of self-deception. Alpha is as alpha has, beta is as beta has, and so on. Vox has Spacebunny, who is very good looking for a wife of a man Vox's age, probably in the 95th percentile or higher. That means he's either an alpha or a sigma by the is as has rule.
If you're in the US and have a woman into you who is BMI 17-23 or so, you're probably a beta on his system. If your woman is overweight/obese, you're probably a delta (over half of women in the US are in this category). If your woman doesn't exist or is lower than that, you just might be a gamma or an omega. Its not really that hard to figure out.

tz said...

No, the only thing men and women are taught to deny these days is reality.
Hence "red pill" results in "welcome to the real world".

de ti said...

Keywords: Broken and sick.

The article at RoK and this summary make the point. Broken women are more attracted to unfaithful men, men who actually do cheat.

A woman who thinks she's worth a shit, a woman who has some self respect (not the modern version of "self-esteem") won't put up with a cheating man.

Bodichi said...

@Deti,

That post does not sound like you. I don't think you are the real deti. Show "cheating" in the bible. Not even once. There is adultery (Sex with another mans wife) and fornication (Sex with a woman you dont marry).

Show the verse that says you can only have one wife (excepting being a deacon).

Cheating is a fake word. It doesn't exist in the context you mention. There is adultery and fornication.

Retrenched said...

"women always want that which they do not have ... no matter how good what they have is."

A Bill Hicks joke:

Adam: Well Eve, here we are in the Garden of Eden. We'll never die, never grow old, never get sick. And God will give us whatever we need as soon as we ask Him.

Eve: Yeah.. It's just not enough, is it?

Verne said...

I hate these sick truths, but they are the true. A cheat and an abuser will lose their wives in time. You keep it up long enough and they will give up on you. But a weak man doing everything a woman says she wants. He will lose her within the year

Verne said...

And the abusers of his woman. That guy will know a passion from his woman that the wimp can only dream of.

Jed Mask said...

"From a strictly hypergamous perspective, the unfaithful man is more sexually attractive than the faithful man, by definition. Traditional women are taught to control their hypergamous urges, just as traditional men are taught to control their promiscuous urges, but then, increasingly few men and women have been taught to deny themselves anything these days."

Yep, yep. That's what the Word of God (King James Version Holy Bible [KJV]) and the Christian CHURCH (if functioning properly) teaches.

When there is a society such as a Western society that does not follow the principals on sexual purity before marriage that the Bible teaches; a literally "screwed up" society is what results. Nothing surprising to the biblically-conscious Christian.

Also, a Christian Alpha or Sigma man that actually OBEYS God's Word(King James Version Holy Bible [KJV]) to not have sex outside of marriage or commit adultery not an "Alpha" or "Sigma" because they don't have sexually-immoral relations?

That the socio-sexual "litmus test" for Alpha and/or Sigma?

I guess John the Baptist must have been a "crazy Omega" who couldn't get a woman.

Or perhaps, God Almighty, Lord Jesus Christ must have been an "Omega" because He died a Virgin in accordance to God's Law concerning sex in the marriage context?

I'd say in this context Mr. Vox is sharing with us is that "men's infidelity" is oftentimes a *key instinctive* sign *to women* that such a man is "sexually-desirable" or "attractive" to the female sex but it's not the entirety.

A Christian Alpha/Sigma man who withholds from playing the "fornication/adultery game" is sexually attractive to women by definition of who he his but because he doesn't "act" on the "sinful impulses" of "The Game" doesn't mean he's still not "Alpha" or "Sigma" or sexually-attractive man to women. Alpha *is* as Sigma *is*. It's who they are.

I know this cuz Lord knows I've had quite a few sisters in Christ checking me out in church like they want to "get something happening" but they be married or in relationships with other men. I know it's wrong for me to commit adultery or "fornicate" so I don't play along those lines as a single young Christian black man. Simple as that.

Smh... Even in CHURCH them women still want to play "dirty" lol. But I'm being serious...

Like TZ said, young folks today need to get *BACK INTO REALITY* apart from first *GETTING RIGHT WITH GOD* by trusting Jesus as Saviour. Amen.

Mountain Man said...

@Bodichi
Yawn...must be Artisinal Toad under a new name...Valiantly trying to defend his Christianized version of Mormonism.

Mountain Man said...

Stop this ride known as Planet Earth... I want to get off.

SirHamster said...

@Mountain Man

Unless he got banned from here, don't see why he would switch handles.

Jed Mask said...

Also... I'm very concerned about a lot of men's misguided views here on *GOD'S DESIGN* of *MARRIAGE*.

Marriage isn't a social "design of men"; marriage is completely *GOD'S DESIGN* from the beginning of (KJV) Genesis.

Really irks me of the really misguided, distorted "twisted" incorrect views on marriage being shared here...

Like this:

"Women are designed to be in harems, men are designed to run harems.

Men are supposed to be tribal. Monogamous marriage merely divides men from being a united cohesive tribe of men, into divided as a family, where no man gives a s--t about another unless he's part of another family.

Marriage was the greatest con foisted upon the tribe of man, designed to divide instead of unite them, by the NWO religion of nimrod & akhenaton, the pagan catholic church."

Women are NOT to be kept in harems. Men are NOT to be keepers of "harems". Though it was the case in Ancient Time for a while, it was only part of God's Plan 'til the time humanity was greatly populated on earth did that practice cease...

The only part I'd agree with in truth is that men (i.e. "humanity") *IS TRIBAL* but everything else is truly "distorted".

GOD MADE MARRIAGE; everything else follows from there.

In actuality, marriage (when working properly) "brings men together" in a healthy, interdependent society among families of "the tribe".

It's how it was in Ancient Days of the Tribes of Israel as a case study. Though every society of flawed, imperfect sinful human-beings has it's problems; it's safe to say the people we're usually more "socially-open" and "connected" to each other in contrast to our modern age, disconnected, isolated society of "crowds" and not real social cohesiveness of "community" among peoples of various ethnicities and socio-economic class.

Marriage *properly functioning* results in a *healthy society* that feeds back into itself in a healthy, smooth *flowing* cycle bringing the community together. Marriage is ALWAYS an ASSET not a "detriment" to society. Anyone who thinks and says differently of the importance of *MARRIGE* in "society" is either ignorantly misinformed or intentionally *DECEITFUL* with *ULTERIOR MOTIVES*.

God made marriage. To say marriage is "bad" is to call something "bad" that GOD MADE.

God don't make mistakes, but we "imperfect" humans can certainly screw up God's Great Designs of Creation.

If anyone "complains" about the "validity" of "marriage" being the cornerstone of a healthy, vibrant society; such individuals have their own self-interests at heart over the actual "greater good" of society overall.

No honest person of wholesome character and integrity would dare "degrade" the importance of *MARRIAGE* in society.

Without healthy marriage, there is no "healthy family", no "healthy tribe', no "healthy community" no "healthy society"; we're living in the results of what happens when a society "defecates" on the importance of *MARRIAGE*.

If the current state of Western Society doesn't *reveal* to people the importance of *MARRIAGE* in a society; there's more hope of a fool to have sense than anyone "bashing against" the sacredness of *MARRIAGE* as designed by *GOD*. Amen.

~ Bro. Jed

Mountain Man said...

SirHamster

Wow ..it looks like he's picking up converts..I see the makings of the next Brigham Young.

Bob Loblaw said...

pagan catholic satanic puritanism

Congrats. That is nearly the dumbest thing I have read on the internet this week, and the internet has been in fighting form lately.


Heh heh. That's what I was thinking, and assumed I was missing something.

Harem societies don't work. They never have. Most guys end up sleeping alone and nobody's going to put much effort into defending a society that leaves them out in the cold.

Michael Maier said...

OK, so the lesson is "Cheat, but only take blowjobs"? Seems like a rational, proportionate response.

"Well, honey... I LOVE you, but she REALLY knows how to suck cock!"

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...

"From a strictly hypergamous perspective, the unfaithful man is more sexually attractive than the faithful man, by definition. Traditional women are taught to control their hypergamous urges, just as traditional men are taught to control their promiscuous urges, but then, increasingly few men and women have been taught to deny themselves anything these days."

These days? The narcissistic West has never been good at this. It still likes to believe it is however, even while it glorifies disobedience and converts it into industries. Then it turns it's back on the festering sores this leaves on the culture and on any that beds down with the West. The mirror has two faces.

Middle Eastern communities have historically been far more disciplined and fastidious at living purely, seemingly knowing at everyone's gut level, that civilization is an inward proposition more than an outward one. The West persistently and consistently ignores this, attributing far more value to its outward 'achievements', even as those things fail utterly to stop the culture from decay. How great can those achievements actually be?

Fred Reed may be right. The rot may be too far gone to save Western civilization. It may have had it's chance, the civil inheritance may now be going to another culture.

Post a Comment

NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.