Friday, October 14, 2016

Female inattention

Men are condemned for occupying their time with sports and video games while their wives and girlfriends are busy Facebooking:
Women spend more time on their smartphones than they do with their partners according to a new study. According to the study, women spend 12-hours more a week checking emails, sending texts, or surfing social media than they do with their loved one. Researchers also found that if people are unable to be on their phones, it leads to stress, anger and panic. A fifth of those surveyed said it would be harder to be without a phone for a week than their partner.
I don't think most people realize how low an average hurdle the sexbots are facing. Or why an increasing number of men can't really be bothered to work too hard for what is mostly female inattention.

29 comments:

sconzey said...

See I'm not sure it will be sexbots-- what the incel crowd really crave more than sex is female companionship (see the film Her)

The disruptive innovation won't be a robot that has sex with you, it'll be a robot that welcomes you home with a cold beer or an expertly made Old Fashioned, makes you dinner and asks you how your day went.

Amy said...

Stepford Wives was prescient.

Erynne said...

I think sconzey is right. How long would it take for the novelty of a sex bot to wear off? Incels feel messed up because the rejection of women means in part the rejection of society, and that fear is ultimately the fear of death by ostracism from the group. A lot of incel guys would feel much better if they could have even a few girls seem interested in them, they'd know that a bot's attention/intimacy is superficial (unless they didn't know it was a bot, I guess, or its so realistic you can hardly tell the difference, but how would you get a robot to mimic human micro gestures and body language?).

I mean, let's face it, beta males are pretty sensitive guys, they like the relationships they have, they'd just prefer sex twice a month or once a week over once every three to six months. It requires so little sex for a woman to keep her beta male happy, because his low T and bad health make him crave it less anyway. That's why I always point men to blogs like this and Roissy, because even a small improvement of game would make his life a lot easier.

Now here's a question, how do you talk your wife into getting you one of those sex bots? Will she be jealous? Will it add a new kink to your relationship?

Whisker biscuit said...

I know couples that will comment and talk to each other on FARCEbook while they're sitting in their living room together. They'd rather sit silent bad occupy the kids with tv or an iPad than interact with each other personally.

Oh, women are sneaky on FB, too. I've received private messages from married women trying to start personal conversations. FB is a glorified dating site.

Mountain Man said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Mountain Man said...

So yesterday Im at a Fed Ex package store. As I walk in I notice a cute little blonde - who looked to be around 20 - busily working on labeling her package. Although she was very fit and had a nice ass, I Immediately noticed that her back was hunched - like Hunchback of Notre Dame. As the line continued to be held up, she finished her labeling and got behind me. I turned around and began small talk. At one point I teased her about being OCD with her labeling. She was enjoying the banter but literally couldn't participate without looking down at her phone every 7-10 seconds. It was rather pathetic to watch. It also dawned on me that she has probably been doing this incessantly since she was 12 - affecting her physically to the point that she now has the makings of a hunch back. What a waste !

Mountain Man said...

Regarding Facebook...
The blog writer at Wall Street Playboy summed it up best: Facebook is for losers going nowhere in life.

Ron said...

@Erynne

Now here's a question, how do you talk your wife into getting you one of those sex bots? Will she be jealous? Will it add a new kink to your relationship?

For shame. C.S. Lewis in his Perlandra series created a civilization that he referred to as being utterly depraved precisely because they could only have sex with machines.

I honestly cannot understand why Vox of all people is speculating for even a moment about this. It is beyond disgusting, it is an abomination. Do the Muslims seem to have an issue with getting their women to act like women? Are the Amish having trouble with this? Are the Mormons? Are the religious Jews having trouble? NO!

This is because the men of those societies, for whatever mistakes they are making are insisting that their women act in a certain way. If there is one thing I have learned from this site, it is that the women crave the leadership of the men. They desperately hunger for it. Genuine masculine strength and love. That is the real power of men, our sense of direction and certainty.

The men of the West are suffering from the effects of high-resource availability, which encourages convenience over principle. Why suffer if like rabbit you can hop away from a problem and find an easier solution somewhere else? Why get rejected 1000 times if you can just do porn. Why fight against a bureacracy if you can eat crap food and play games instead of cutting through suffocating red tape and corrupt maniacs?

This sexbot filth is just another example of that. It is cowardice, it is a lack of self belief, of FAITH.

Fight the bastards that hate you, punch them in the face, let them know you are not a free lunch. That you are not "going gently into the night". Those people are cowards, they have all their clever schemes and plans, but they are ultimately terrified cowards.

swiftfoxmark2 said...

This is bad trend for young men and women. Men aren't stupid and they will recognize when they are being loved and respected. And when women use their smartphones and only talk to men to dump their emotional crap on them, guess what happens?

Only low-level deltas, omegas, and gammas will put up with that. And that's the bottom 33% at best.

Ron said...

@Mountain Man

Facebook is a real problem. Society always suffers when a new technology is invented because the culture has not had the time to figure out how to deal with it.

At some point the men are going to have to figure out when and where using Facebook is acceptable, then insist on standards among the women. The way to do this is to strengthen the young men. Teach them to be strong and independent. Create an environment where a young man can get together with his brothers and open up a new business without being ass raped by a corrupt bureacracy. Make it clear to the nihilist scum that you will not tolerate their bullying and psychological raping of the young men. This means going into the schools and fighting against the parasites that use it for that purpose. Create new schools where every young man is taught a trade, is taught how to ride horses (I'm not joking), to grow plants, to scout in the woods, to be independent. Give them your support and make sure they know you are backing them 100%. And at the same time give them your guidance to have integrity and look out for one another.

Once you do that, they will have the power to turn to the women and make it clear what will and won't be tolerated, and the women will go along because they will recognize that their brothers are serious and need them.

Whatever, that's just what I'm thinking.

dc.sunsets said...

Social media are anything but.

Mankind has always had vices, nominally pleasurable behaviors that lead inexorably to self-destruction. This undoubtedly dates to pre-history, when fermentation probably arose as a means of food preservation. I wonder when dice were invented?

Now, modern Man appears to have conquered many of Nature's scourges (famine, most pestilence and many sewage-related diseases) so he creates his own scourges to replace them. Nature abhors a vacuum.

Stupid is as stupid does. Give stupid people toys, conditions, etc., they could never produce themselves, and you get the same situation as putting a troop of baboons in a candy store. Modernity simply changes the means by which the population is culled of unfit individuals.

Eventually, the paradoxes embedded in this bizarro world will shine, and those embedded in folly will be washed away.

dc.sunsets said...

@ Ron, Alvin Toffler's "Future Shock" may be close to what you describe, but I suggest that you're grossly overestimating the ability of culture to figure out the changes of modernity. We're genetically the same as our distant ancestors, for the most part. In reality, humans haven't really figured out how to deal with abstractions like stock markets, and they've been around for numerous centuries.

Undocumented Pharmacist said...

The sexbots on HBO's Westworld would never be allowed to be sold outside of the the park's boundaries because society would basically end within 50 years in a "Don't Date Robots" scenario. Damn, Elon Musk's ex-wife is hawt!

manuel hernandez said...

How ironic. Everything women accused us of doing they are doing in droves. Like spend too much time in front of a screen, drinking, getting absorbed by a "career", having copious amounts of sex, etc.

"How long would it take for the novelty of a sex bot to wear off?" Just like with a human female, very quickly. Unless you are obsessed with getting laid all the time, the novelty of sex with a woman will wear off quickly, particularly if booty is all she offers.

Jed Mask said...

Git yo' woman busy in the kitchen and tell her we gonna "talk".

Hammerli280 said...

Important note to any woman looking for a quality husband - put the damned phone away. (true for men also)

Joe A. said...

Is the future a white minority in almost every formerly white nation, with the white men of said nations largely fucking sexbots?

Leandro Novaes said...

@sconzey @Erynne Consider the domino effect. Right now, women have a lot of power because a lot of (beta) men are willing to do whatever it takes for a chance at sex. Let's face it, companionship is nice, but what they really want is sex. That makes women gatekeepers and give them the last say. They can be bitches because they are the choosers. But what happens when you don't need women for sex? The only thing they have left to offer is companionship. They must be nice, even to the omega guy, because even if they are not interested in the omega guy, he is still friends with the beta guy or even the alpha guy they are interested in. They have to be nice because being nice and pleasant will become literally their only coin.

Leandro Novaes said...

@Ron You are wrong. All of them have trouble handling their women. The fact that they have to threaten women with being stoned to death with they give in to their base urges should hint you at that.

VFM #7634 said...

@sconzey

I don't understand why any man would want female companionship without sex. If that's what they really want, they can go visit their mothers.

sconzey said...

@VFM#7634:

Jacking off to porn is at least a partial substitute for sex, but there's no equivalent for female companionship. To reduce the complexities of marriage to "he gives her money, she gives him sex" is to over-simplify and lose something important.

Yeah, guys want sex, but more than that they want to be loved and valued and appreciated. That's why prostitutes can charge punters through the nose for the 'girlfriend experience', far more than they'd charge for just sex -- the sex is the cheapest part of the service.

531greyghost said...

What makes you all so certain it is "incel's" that will only be interested in a sexbot. The real damage is when a man with options to weigh chooses a sexbot and surrogate or artificial womb over a "real" woman. Such a man will be just as hard working and productive as any family man taking care of his family. Maybe even more so with out the threat of divorce or actual divorce interrupting his retirement and savings himself and children. Once a the government starts to enjoy the power and wealth of such men they will not stop it and just continue on pumping up women for votes.
In today's world a smart man with the choice would choose not a "real" woman. Imagine a world with near zero DV, or divorce and other gender conflicts with men literally seeing women with indifference. Add a male birth control pill where he has full authority to lie. (she doesn't know) We will have beta working men that for SMV purposes will be "strong" with out ever giving up their cooperative productive natures. The plus side is the government can still push feminism and female empowerment with reduced consequence on productivity.

Remo - Vile Faceless Minion #99 said...

"...the answer lies in convincing girls that they have agency. I suspect it lies in teaching them that their actions have consequences, that their decisions matter, and that things don't ever "just happen" for no reason."

You can't teach a child these things except in the abstract sense. Even when the worst happens it doesn't happen because its their fault - it is always circumstance or some past boyfriend(s) or the buddha or whatever. What is needed is parenting. Give a woman agency over her own vag and you create an army of whores followed by a parade of single mothers and crazy cat ladies. Like letting children live in candy stores and expecting them to eat their vegetables by showing them pictures of rotting teeth - it doesn't work. Match makers and paternal control existed for a good reason.

Bob Loblaw said...

Oh, women are sneaky on FB, too. I've received private messages from married women trying to start personal conversations. FB is a glorified dating site.

That's been my experience too. I guess that's why they call it "Cheatbook". My married exes seem to think having sex with a past lover doesn't count as infidelity, and FB is a good way to find old lovers. Part of me wants to do it, part of me wants to forward the (sometimes explicit) messages to their respective husbands, and part of me thinks the sheer trashiness of it all is a good reason to start drinking.

Rex Little said...

Bob, it's not just old lovers. My wife had a male best friend from her teens through her early 30's; they never dated or hooked up during that time. They lost track of each other for 25 years before he found her on Facebook. Now they're lovers, and she's my ex-wife. (She did count it as infidelity, and was very contrite about it, so the divorce was easy-breezy.)

Laguna Beach Fogey said...

Important note to any woman looking for a quality husband - put the damned phone away. (true for men also)

In upscale restaurant bars in Newport Beach and Laguna Beach, it's not uncommon to see most of the single patrons (and groups of women) at the bar glued to their phones.

tweell said...

Of course men are condemned for spending time with sports and video games. Men should be working 24/7/365 for women! Get back to work, slave, and stop slacking.

Bob Loblaw said...

Of course men are condemned for spending time with sports and video games. Men should be working 24/7/365 for women! Get back to work, slave, and stop slacking.

Her part time volunteer job at the local animal shelter is just as important and stressful as your 60 hour coffee-is-for-closers job, so make sure you do at least 50% of the cooking and chores.

JP said...

Well it's a good thing the phone has a vibrating feature.

Post a Comment

NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.