Right now, across the Western world there are millions of very lonely women who will die alone and childless. There are millions of single moms who will at least have their children, but never even get another date as they get fat and grow bitter.
There are countless Gammas who will wonder why they can’t get a date this weekend, but the above women won’t even give them the time of day. Many of these Gammas would marry a single mom if given the chance so it’s not about that.
What does this mean? That millions of women would rather die alone, have their cats starve a few weeks later, and their bodies found by a landlord or a friend than spend one romantic moment with a low ranking man.
35 comments:
"spend one romantic moment with a low ranking man"
Deltas are low ranking. They can barely make the cut. Women will come out to date deltas - barely - just to cringe at how much the guys sucked.
One of my friends is a delta. In four months, he has approached 375 women, got 10-20 numbers, 10 kisses, 5 dates, 1 fuck. Depressing to most aspiring casanovas.
Last night, was out with a friend. Was sitting in front of what looked like an arranged date (2 pairs: one a couple, the other not). Delta guy had been matched up with a periWall 30yr old 7-8 woman. She didn't even have the 'decency' to reciprocate his interest. Couldn't care one bit about getting to know more about him.
It seems that people in the past were more willing to understand the idea of "a good match" -- that is, their rank in the sexual marketplace. It's not that they were "settling," it's that they understood what they could get with what they had.
But now we're all special and unique and lovely and perfect just the way we are, so our perception of our rank is way out of whack.
Is there any hope of fixing that?
One of my friends is a delta. In four months, he has approached 375 women, got 10-20 numbers, 10 kisses, 5 dates, 1 fuck. Depressing to most aspiring casanovas.
Good on him for doing all those approaches, but I wouldn't blame his rate all on the women. There is definitely one (or more) aspects of his game that are fairly weak if he only get's one lay for almost 400 approaches. Approaching is absolutely necessary, but still only one part of a successful interpersonal interaction.
Krauser logged i lay per 37 opens http://krauserpua.com/2014/01/01/my-2013-daygame-stats/
Of course he is basically a 'pro' but, still not reasonable to assume that a practiced layman should be able to get at least 1 in 100.
One of my friends is a delta. In four months, he has approached 375 women, got 10-20 numbers, 10 kisses, 5 dates, 1 fuck. Depressing to most aspiring casanovas.
@Rek.
I'm curious to know why you call him a Delta rather than a Gamma or high Omega.
If he's doing 375 approaches, he's quickly overcoming his deltaness.
Besides, it's a game. He's playing, you win some, you lose some. He's probably still building his 'team'.
Re: OP, perhaps there's hope for our species yet.
Rek, Deltas aren't low ranking by definition. All you've done is redefine the name to suit your beliefs. By definition Deltas are average. If Deltas are low ranking, what are Betas? Average?
I've heard the same from a female friend in her mid-30s. She's come to terms that she's not going to get married, but she has her cats, and can also focus on being a good aunt to her brother's kids. Real depressing conversation.
What do you call these women - Looooossssseeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrr!
A woman is breeding stock. If she can't come to terms with that, find a man to mate with, and settle down to do him right, she has lost the game of life. Her genes don't deserve to survive. So it is written. So mote it be.
" Deltas aren't low ranking by definition."
Exactly. Deltas are the average, by this blog's definition. Though I have little trouble believing most women rank themselves "above average".
It's funny... we got a new guy in the office and he seems like an alright guy. But he's married and the broads in the office flock around his desk and act rather stupid and downright undignified around him. Good on him... I guess. But still.
And the blogosphere talks about MEN's "thirst"? Post-wall women have men beat hands-down.
Females are supposed to be choosy, especially when it comes to sex. They are supposed to want the best males -- that is natural and healthy and good for the larger society. What isn't natural and healthy is the constant lies fed to females about Romanticism and unrealistic expectations, and the superior-class citizenship awarded to females for being female.
It's not the choosiness of females that needs correcting, that's biological. It's the entire gynarchic structure of western anti-cultures, with the State and 'churches' taking power and authority away from men, and giving it to women, and to themselves. That's the part that must (and eventually will, one way or another) be changed. Expecting females suddenly to just 'want' inexperienced or unproven males is not going to happen, any more than building fences around the nations is going to happen.
It's two sides of the same coin.
Neither knows how to be attractive to the other because they're stuck solipsistically imagining the other wants the same thing they want.
One of the side effects of the Golden Rule passing for morality/social wisdom, among other causes.
"If he's doing 375 approaches, he's quickly overcoming his deltaness."
Yeah, that takes a lot of courage. Does the average man get anywhere near that number in, say, 10 years?
something for the Deltas and lower to consider ... this is what a woman who wants to please you acts like:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1TsVjvEkc4s
Right so the solution is to remove the social engineering that allows these women to exist without having to work - lose affirmative action powerpoint jobs, lose TANF, welfare, food stamps, and all the other free monies that women routinely get, and force them to face all the very real challenges like hunger, exposure, and illness that generations fought to insulate them against. Right now they have a choice of living alone until age 90 or so with their cats, but nature offers another choice - starve *now*, die of exposure *now*, die of infection *now*, freeze to death *now*. Something tells me given *those* choices that most women will magically find themselves attracted to men who aren't all 7 feet tall billionaires with six pack abs.
"One of my friends is a delta. In four months, he has approached 375 women, got 10-20 numbers, 10 kisses, 5 dates, 1 fuck. Depressing to most aspiring casanovas."
Goddamn. It's a miracle Deltas even get married with stats like that.
Yeah, that takes a lot of courage. Does the average man get anywhere near that number in, say, 10 years?
Probably not even if you count online dating emails lol
@ corvinus
"I'm curious to know why you call him a Delta rather than a Gamma or high Omega."
He is your solid, dependable guy friend. Average in all aspects. He doesn't harvest any dellusions. Doesn't dwell in solitude and bitterness. He is just slightly awkward and a bit weird with women in a very genuine/candid way. He is not a king and knows it.
@ DoubleE
"Good on him for doing all those approaches, but I wouldn't blame his rate all on the women. There is definitely one (or more) aspects of his game that are fairly weak if he only get's one lay for almost 400 approaches. Approaching is absolutely necessary, but still only one part of a successful interpersonal interaction. "
Of course it's not all on women. My point is women are unforgiving and have such a high sense of entitlement.
@ Delta Man
"Rek, Deltas aren't low ranking by definition. All you've done is redefine the name to suit your beliefs. By definition Deltas are average. If Deltas are low ranking, what are Betas? Average? "
The socio-sexual value of a man is not defined by what men believe that man to be worth but by women and their self-perceived worth. An average man is a man who can consistantly get with average women.
But the problem is the vast majority of average women will look the other way when confronted with what men consider to be average men. Average women overestimate their SSV by at least 2 points. Ask any 5-6 what she thinks about herself and she'll tell you she is an 8 (weird shit right). I've had that talk with women too many times for it to be disproven.
The average woman wants an above average man. But that above average man is only but an average guy since he is getting with average females. Zero sum game. ALPHAS will get with top and second tier women + all the average self-entitled girls. The deltas will be the crumbs.
But you are right this is all but semantics. You get what I am trying to say.
@ David093
"Goddamn. It's a miracle Deltas even get married with stats like that."
And he only got laid because that one girl was some DTF bipolar castrating married woman.
@ Delta man
What I couldn't communicate correctly, what I am trying to say, is that there is no average man. There are only two categories. Men who are attractive and get laid consistantly, have control over their dating life and those who are hoping. 0 or 1. Nothing in between.
Now I'm starting to see why some folks think the commenters here suck.
@ Michael Maier
Passive-aggressive comment. Gamma tendencies spoted. Keep on dwelling in your delta misery and enjoy being an average dude ... And just ask your college out.
Right so the solution is to remove the social engineering that allows these women to exist without having to work - lose affirmative action powerpoint jobs, lose TANF, welfare, food stamps, and all the other free monies that women routinely get, and force them to face all the very real challenges like hunger, exposure, and illness that generations fought to insulate them against. Right now they have a choice of living alone until age 90 or so with their cats, but nature offers another choice - starve *now*, die of exposure *now*, die of infection *now*, freeze to death *now*. Something tells me given *those* choices that most women will magically find themselves attracted to men who aren't all 7 feet tall billionaires with six pack abs.
True. And if a woman has children, a low-ranking man is even more annoying, less tolerable than a whiney child - esp. the Gamma losers, as they treat most woman as mommies.
Rek, your friend might be a low ranking Delta. Remember Delta goes all of the way down to 3 on the scale of 1-10 because Gamma is more of personality type rather than rank, though the highest a Gamma can be is also a 3.
If he wants more success he needs to move sights. Help him pick out 2-3s for a month or two to approach online and see what kind of success he has in just getting their attention. If he gets a very good response he's likely a 3-4 himself, if he still strikes out then your assessment of him is generous, but over rated.
As for two types of men, my existence disproves this binary assessment. When I decided to start dating to get married I didn't have women tripping all over themselves to get near me, nor was I in a barren wasteland. I routinely had dates, (a few per month) and found my future wife in just a few months of dating and we have been together now for a decade.
"There are only two categories. Men who are attractive and get laid consistantly, have control over their dating life and those who are hoping. 0 or 1. Nothing in between."
How's that? Learning how to attract women takes time, and you refine your skills along the way. You may start as a hapless loser, but with practice you begin to achieve success to varying degrees. Unless I'm misunderstanding you.
There are only two categories. Men who are attractive and get laid consistantly, have control over their dating life and those who are hoping. 0 or 1. Nothing in between.
There are only two categories of men: Those with nipple clamps and those without.
Wow, that was easy!
Rek,
I get what you're saying, but you necessarily limit the entirety of male behavior to only one situation and, voila!, make a quick cut list.
You don't think you're greatly underestimating the behavior of men and masculinity by such a narrow definition, such that there are only two categories? That's why the Alpha/Beta/Delta/Gamma works. It provides more tools to spot anomalies, for example, like "situational alphas," AFCs, etc.
Situational alphas fall flat as soon as the situation shifts.
AFCs may not get sex regularly and could face a frivorce. Once back "in the wild," they may find access to women more easily because they possess a "Next" mindset of a person who has learned the hard way to not pedestalize women.
A single mother I'm friends with is the stereotypical sorta crazy, drinks a lot, will probably die alone modern American woman. Every day she posts memes on FB talking about how she wants to be in a relationship, but nobody takes her up on it. It's funny because they used to before she slept with, I shit you not, a loser who never bothers with his kid and is a drug addict. There were all kinds of guys after her. Now? Nothing.
What's the lesson? Women don't know what's good for them and go off the rails if not properly lead. FB's tag line should be "watch a trainwreck as it unfolds."
Ray Females are supposed to be choosy, especially when it comes to sex. They are supposed to want the best males -- that is natural and healthy and good for the larger society.
I don't believe that. In a normal society women know where their status is, and what their prospects are. They will then try to get men in that status group to marry them. Marriage is not really for men, it is for women - to protect them from being dumped as their beauty fades and they become infertile.
This rampant hypergamy, or sluthood looking for alphas to f**k them, is a sign of massive degeneracy in women. They have bought a program and are acting it out. When men reclaim their patrimony they will be happy acting as decent as they are now indecent.
Passive-aggressive comment. Gamma tendencies spoted. Keep on dwelling in your delta misery and enjoy being an average dude ... And just ask your college out.
Is English your first language or are you a fucking moron?
Delta isn't "misery". Neither is "average".
Further, you said there IS no average.
Your comments are so stupid they make me feel dumber just for reading them.
I would imagine this works both ways. Aren't there some of these lonely women who'd settle for a Gamma, but are so fugly that even the Gammas don't want them?
Rex, not as much as you'd think. They'd "settle for" a Gamma, but they wouldn't want one as ugly as themselves. They'd also show him no gratitude after the vows were spoken. They'd soon reduce the sex to monthly or so and nag him unto death for not being the hunky millionaire they always thought they deserved on the inside.
There's a common assumption that beauty and personality are inversely proportional, so that hotties tend to be bitches and therefore ugly fat chicks are sweet. It just isn't so. In fact, it's often the other way: the hottie is quite nice but has developed a bitch shield to keep away excess attention, while the uggo has developed a lot of resentment over her condition and is just waiting to take it out on a man.
If you're just looking for blowjobs, the dating sites are full of desperate, fat, ugly, used-up women who will show up and blow you on the first date, while they're trying to put their best foot forward. But if you're looking for anything more, they aren't a good bet.
@ Cail Corishev: "In fact, it's often the other way: the hottie is quite nice but has developed a bitch shield to keep away excess attention, while the uggo has developed a lot of resentment over her condition and is just waiting to take it out on a man."
That points to a struggle relevant to this blog. I believe that I've slowly worked my up over the years from omega to low delta, with an extended gamma phase -- and yeah, I have some lingering resentment over all those years spent alone. It's a real stumbling block, and merely knowing that it's irrational doesn't make it magically go away.
Post a Comment
NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.