Sunday, November 16, 2014
Gamma delusion bubble
Apparently a quote from this blog is listed on Fundies Say The Darndest Things as one of their Top 100 quotes: "I don't believe I could recommend this as a strategy for most men, but it is surely educational to learn that raping and killing a woman is demonstrably more attractive to women than behaving like a gentleman. And women, before all the inevitable snowflaking commences, please note that there is absolutely nothing to argue about here. It is an established empirical fact. I would go so far to argue that if you are being introduced to a woman you find attractive, she will be more attracted to you if you slap her in the face without warning and walk away without explanation than if you smile and tell her that you are very pleased to meet her. Now this, being a mere hypothesis, can be argued. And tested, if you're feeling especially scientific this weekend."
Many of the reactions of the SJW girls and Gammas are, of course amusing, beginning with this one: "There is totally something to argue here. For one it seems like you're
generalizing a significant part of the human population, for the other
you're not even providing any proof to your ABSOLUTELY HAIR-BRAINED
theory." Well, yes, hence the term "hypothesis". And science deals in evidence, not proofs; that is logic. But what I find particularly amusing is their desperate need to believe, contra the readily available evidence, that I look something like the picture to the left, which to be honest looks a lot more like a younger, thinner version of most of the male members of the SFWA. Except Diaper Boy has better hair.
Nor does it ever seem to occur to them to think that perhaps my statements about women are an informed opinion. I mean guy who have record contracts at the age of 22 usually have a lot of trouble finding women to date, right? And strangely enough, they never seem to have anything to say about my actual appearance. I wonder why that might be?
14 comments:
Women who disagree should explain why men featured on "meet a prisoner" sites are met with more enthusiasm than quality men on respectable sites.
Irony: ...ABSOLUTELY HAIR-BRAINED theory."
No, the term is "hare-brained", indicating that the person doing the thinking has a rabbit-sized brain, and a complete inability to think things through. Hmm... rabbit...
But what I find particularly amusing is their desperate need to believe, contra the readily available evidence that I look something like the picture to the left, which to be honest looks a lot more like a younger, thinner version of most of the male members of the SFWA.
Needs another comma after the word "evidence".
Out at a bar with friends, one friend is really interested in this chick. I accidentally negged her into my corner by saying things like, "Nah, women shouldn't get to vote. They ruin everything." At one point, she suggested calling some of her girly friends to balance the guy/girl ratio. I said, "they have to be at least as attractive as you, because you're like, the cutoff point. We have standards." My poor buddy delta'd himself right into the friendzone, while I could have gone home with her if I didn't have those aforementioned standards. Every time he called her to ask if she wanted to hang out, "is ghost gonna be there?"
My usual response to a woman saying, "pleased to meet you", is, "I know". I've yet to say it with a completely straight face though.
If you’re in or near Los Angeles, come to the meet up of Men… today. It begins at noon. Details
Of course no one would object to the generalization that men will be attracted to a woman with a sexy body even if she has a rotten character
Honestly it depend on two things.
First and foremost...follow through. No getting around out it, you have to back up that introduction with something.
Second...how hard you slap her.
"My usual response to a woman saying, "pleased to meet you", is, "I know". I've yet to say it with a completely straight face though."
I saw a better response to this on (of all things) a porno:
"I know, right?"
I've not had chance to use it either. I also cannot decide the best tone to use it with.
"I know, right?"
Good one. Here's another -
Pleased to meet you.
Pleasure's all yours.
Too much hair on chest.
4/10
Would not bang.
And I am going to guess that in his early high school years Vox was a bit nerdy and small. And maybe even a gentlemen. In other words he could not get a date. With age came wisdom, muscles and things than made him look cool. In other words Vox has seen both sides of game and knows a few things.
Alright, I took the time to scroll through it. The majority of their list probably falls under Poe's law. They've got a quote from Rush Limbaugh that was so freaking obviously satire, you have to be socially retarded or just plain lying to say that it he was literally proposing to disarm and censor liberals. Lots of retards in the comments on that one.
But they also got your martial rape/army consent comparison on there. I understand why that upsets them, but it doesn't make you wrong.
Have to admit vox, you look like one badass motherfu--r. But who's the goofy kid on the stool?
Post a Comment
NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.