When Lara Stemple, a researcher at UCLA looked at the latest National Crime Victimization Survey, she was shocked to see that men experienced rape and sexual assault almost as frequently as women, and that women were often the perpetrators. Once the definition of rape was expanded to include more than just penetration, it became clear that men and women were equally likely to be raped, and more importantly, equally likely to be rapists. Researchers from the University of Missouri got the same results, finding that “43% of high school boys and young college men reported they had an unwanted sexual experience and of those, 95% said a female acquaintance was the aggressor.”The difference, of course, is that while men may regret being sexually assaulted by a sub-par woman, they don't press charges, they just expect to be mocked by their friends. And rightly so.
Sexual assault on college campuses and how that is handled has been all over the news lately, with even the President taking time to address the issue. But almost without exception, all the cases given as examples involve women as victims and men as perpetrators. Yet the survey and the confirmation from independent researchers indicates that men are often the victims and women the perpetrators.
Like those 43 percent of young men, I am a victim of rape by a female aggressor. Do try to keep that in mind before you attempt to criticize me for anything. It should be interesting to see how the women who elevate rape victims to secular sainthoood will twist-and-shout to distinguish female-rape from rape-rape.
Why do these female rapists need to be educated? It seems to me they need to be jailed.
23 comments:
"It should be interesting to see how the women who elevate rape victims to secular sainthoood will twist-and-shout to distinguish female-rape from rape-rape."
They do it readily, viz The Vagina Monologue's "good rape" of a teen girl by a cougar. Apparently the key to determining if a sex act is questionable is to suss out whether an xy chromo is involved. If not, presto, no rape...it's good.
Speaking of xy chromos, some of those most resistant to the idea of "teaching women not to rape" and / or jailing females who sexually assault aren't crazed hothouse feminists, but men themselves.
I can now label myself as a multiple rape survivor/victim. I wonder if I could use this logic to cram it right back down their throats in the Army's sexual assault super high alert most baddest thing ever environment. Seriously, a young private has a few drinks and takes a piss in the alley at the side of the club waiting for a cab. He is subsequently arrested, placed into ASAP for an alcohol problem and severely disciplined. A young female spends all night drinking with her friend and boyfriend and later has sex with her friend's boyfriend. She claims sexual assault because she was so drunk she couldn't recall the details. She is not enrolled in ASAP with an alcohol problem? Drinking and fucking until you can't recall the details? How about the Army's "Don't be that Guy" campaign". Shows soldiers face down in vomit, at the foot of a urinal, ect. Where is the "Don't be that Girl" campaign. Girl face down drunk with her panties around her ankles. Never happens. Drunk guy in his own vomit=hilarious. Drunk girl=victim and no part of what comes next is her fault EVARRRRR.
The Army sure knows what it's doing in this area, Bard. At the mess hall at Camp Humphries, a Helpful sign is posted that informs girls they don't have to have sex even if they are doing things such as wearing sex clothes.
men and women were equally likely to be raped, and more importantly, equally likely to be rapists.
I probably shouldn't chuckle at the fact that these people have become so convinced that homosexuals and various other deviants are such a large percentage of the population that these could be two separate facts.
Conscientia Republicae: "a Helpful sign is posted that informs girls they don't have to have sex even if they are doing things such as wearing sex clothes."
In this context, tell that to your captors.
Baton Rouge Teacher Accused of Sex With Teen Boy
This seems to be more and more common now. Is it more frequent or did always occur and seldom get reported?
CR, curious if you've heard of this. Yesterday I learned of an enlisted female who was raped and subsequently honorably discharged with the maximum benefits (75%) given to medically retired vets. Her aunt told me the story and didn't fail to say: "while I wouldn't wish being raped on anyone, can you imagine that, she's basically set for life now."
That women can and do commit sexual offenses shouldn't surprise anyone well-acquainted with the female libido.
SD,
Look up Jill Metzger. Major USAF. Read what Major MacDonald at Military Corruption. Com says about her.
The perverse incentive is huge their SD. Sign up, falsely claim rape and get a nice level of income guaranteed for life.
She may or may not have been raped, but I have to imagine some others will jump on this money bandwagon if it became the standard.
I go to clubs pretty close to never, the occasional bachelor party, but every time I am in one I am sexually assaulted (ass/crotch grab, genital grinding) by a 5-7 thickie in the fast lane to obesity. Strippers (another bachelor party favorite) show far more restraint until services are agreed to than desperate club rats.
This seems to be more and more common now. Is it more frequent or did always occur and seldom get reported?
Its actually been going on a long time, but the public institute of indoctrination is an arm of the State and not the enemy the Church is. So these teachers leave under mysterious circumstances and settlements are made to keep the families quiet. It seems with the advent of social media they are no longer able to hide things as well as they used to mainly because now the victim has actual proof.
Is it more frequent or did always occur and seldom get reported?
I don't know if you're asking about teacher/student sex in general, or female-teacher/male-student specifically. But in general, two things have changed since the homosexual priest molester scandals:
1) Everyone now knows you can sue the school/church/organization for big money.
2) People no longer believe it's better for the child to keep it quiet. In the 1970s and '80s, the consensus among mental health professionals and everyone else was that making a kid testify would only increase the damage. So when parents found out their kid had been molested, they thought the kindest thing for the kid was to make it go away quietly -- maybe get the kid some discreet therapy, but certainly not go public with it.
Those are two big reasons that cases are much more likely to be reported to police than they were in the past. Another is that everyone who works with kids today is on notice that you're required to report anything suspicious you see, and any failure to do so can cost you your own job or get you arrested. So they're all watching each other more closely, and just showing an interest in working with kids practically makes you suspect now.
The difference, of course, is that while men may regret being sexually assaulted by a sub-par woman, they don't press charges, they just expect to be mocked by their friends. And rightly so.
Yet another example of the slutty desperate fat chick being the butt (heh) of jokes and other snide remarks.
I also suspect that if a man does have sex with a fat slut and feels ashamed about it, he'll want to keep quiet because both the men and the hotter girls will justly figure that if he went ahead with porking her, he must have been desperate himself.
In the Eighties when I worked at a fairly lofty government gig, Newly Empowered Women (with shoulderpads!) liked to pat men on the butt when alone in the hallways. This was before the Pussy Panopticon was omnipresent. One of them pulled this on me once, and I just ignored it as trivial (which, in a larger sense, it certainly was not). I shrugged it off and moved on. But if I'd wanted to complain, it would only have made me, inevitably, the Perpetrator. You know, for suggesting a member of the Protected Classes could do something so sexist and chauvinistic.
These women and their government knew exactly what they were doing, and that they would face no consequences for their power/emasculation aggressions. Without that entire cultural approbation -- certainly including 'judicial' agencies and LE, they would never have tried that bullshit. A guy pulling that would have awakened in the ER.
Cheers.
@SarahsDaughter
I know a girl in he the exact same situation, I say girl and not 36 year old woman because 18 years later, her mind is simply not functioning correctly and never will.
She's a sweet, wonderful and permanently broken girl. She is also set up for life via the army. If I were her, I'd have used the money to hire someone to take permanent care of the animal that did this to her.
Ray I have had several such instances in my working life akin to your experience, I have also had females in higher management positions physically assault me on a daily basis in a minor way. When I complained to management more than once, nothing was done. This was when I was working for a major UK retail bank. I ended up quitting because of the inaction of the feminist infested HR and management. This has cost me a good pension/ career and income that is over $500,000 because of one feminist piece of shit, that was also a scientologist by the way.
I can also attest to the fact that when the second wave feminists filtrated into the education system in the UK in the mid 1980's. This country turned into a cuntry. The leftist collectivist bullshit that a male had to deal with in academia increased expotentially. After three decades of dealing with this bull pucky I think it is time for men as a group to de-corporatize themselves as corporations as well as the co-opted western governments are the funders of feminism as an ideology. We as men need to starve the beast from taxation revenue and corporate profits. They are both as guilty as academia in the propagation of this hate movement.
self employment and understanding the taxation loopholes are the keys to emancipation for males.
Logically, there are only two options:
1) They keep the current societal definition of rape or
2) They revert to the actual legal definition.
If 1), then they must either give men the same benefits as women or they must accept that their hatred of men will become unconcealably obvious to the neutral-parties-that- need-convincing...which should result in either backlash against the blatant unfairness, and/or in number 2 above.
It's hard to see a downside to this.
http://www.psmag.com/navigation/health-and-behavior/half-lifts-workout-says-social-class-85221/
^ completely unrelated article ...
An older woman at a bar once introduced herself to me by licking my forehead. Under the "expanded definition", do I qualify as a rape victim?
Post a Comment
NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.