Friday, August 22, 2014

Feminism reaches its logical extreme

I suppose it was only a matter of time before some young feminist fool decided that Amazonia was a policy prescription rather than an amusingly titillating legend:
 VICE: I assume The Ratio refers to your belief the male population should be reduced to between by 90 percent.

The Femitheist: I believe that conventional equality, with a 50/50 female-to-male ratio, is an inferior system. Essentially my ideas lead to men being made a special class—a far more valued class—having choice of a myriad of women due to the difference in sex ratio. That is my intention. Men would be made more valuable, and their quality of life would be dramatically improved. They would have a subsidised existence if you will, akin to going on an all-expenses paid vacation that lasts from birth to death.

Assuming people are down for that, how could you reduce the male population by that much? Are you talking culling or selective breeding over years?

Obviously men comprise a substantial portion of the victims of violent crime and participate heavily in war, so there will always be deaths there—but certainly not culling. I don't advocate selective slaughter or brutal processes.

So how would you achieve it?

Further research into designer babies will be necessary: manipulating gender or sex, prenatal sex discernment, sex-selective abortions, development of dual-female progeny (babies created from two mothers), and numerous other mechanisms will be utilised in order to achieve these aspirations. They won’t be enforced or mandated to achieve the goal in the short-term, but merely heavily encouraged in the early stages. Unless one opposes abortion, there's little ethical reason to find that too outrageous a proposition. The maths has already been done on all of the genetic and population-sustainment-related issues: population bottleneck, inbreeding, mutations, et cetera. Everything works out in favour of my ideas. I've been meticulous and cautious. I've had the work reviewed by people who are experts—or at least extremely knowledgeable—in biology and genetics, and I've received confirmation that it all works out.

That’s in theory, what about in practice?


It'll require the re-teaching of everyone—female and male—in classrooms, homes, through literature, media, art, and networks. It is a process that would take decades, generations, and perhaps even a few centuries. Nevertheless, these are things that should be done to forge a new and vastly superior world. My mission is to devise and describe a framework for the carrying out and success of such objectives.
Considering that feminism is a dysgenic philosophy that has already led to a statistically significant decline of human intelligence, this sounds like a perfect recipe for a return to the caves. Feminism is not only insane, incoherent, and misandrist, it is avowedly misanthropic. It is literally anti-human. It must be eradicated, root-and-branch.

Don't blithely accept it when women tell you that they are feminists. You should react to a feminist the way a Jew does when he learns someone is a National Socialist, or the way a self-made capitalist entrepeneur does to a card-carrying communist, with outrage and contempt. Feminism is pure and unrestrained evil, and feminists are anti-human monsters less sympathetic than the average Nazi.

At least the Nazis were eugenic. Feminism can't even surmount that exceedingly low bar.

45 comments:

b1bae96e-6447-11e3-b6bb-000f20980440 said...

This femcunt probably thinks that the fairies conjure the food and consumer goods on the shelf and unicorns build roads. I really really wish there was Team Man. Considering 85% of the construction workers, electricians, plumbers, utility workers, miners, farmers, drillers, engineers, and pretty much anybody else that has anything to do with building and maintaining the infrastructure in which civilization is built on is male, just organizing a week where all men call in sick would be more than enough to cure feminism.

Nomennovum said...

When I first read that piece, I thought it was satire. It is hard to tell these days.

totenhenchen said...

She is a bona fide batshit crazy bitch who faked her own suicide a couple of years ago after her insane videos started making the rounds in MRA circles.

http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.com/2011/07/krista-jane-heflin-misandric-fixation.html?m=1

JC said...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCdrUW--Jic

Reminded me of this and YouTube delivers.

Also a feminist arguing that one man is equal to ten women? Interesting.

JLT said...

I wonder who will be in the tiny minority of men who are allowed to survive? Hard workers and productive men, or the sexy bad boys who are causing the problems she's blaming 'men' for?

I know who she expects to be the muscle she needs to achieve her goal, but who will protect her from the men she would allow to survive once she's rid herself of the betatude?

JLT said...

I wonder what her stance is on the death penalty. As a good feminist, and thus a good liberal, she'd oppose it, right?

Owen said...

A little girl stares at a chalkboard with strange markings.

"Mommy, what are the squiggles?"

The mother stares at the markings for a moment and responds, "The ancients called it, 'Math,' but we have long since lost the meaning of it."

"Mommy, I'm hungry. When can we eat?"

"When our house-man arrives to loosen the lid on the penut butter, dear," she replies wistfully, "When he arrives to loosen the lid..."

Eowyn said...

Because that's what women truly want: to select a lover from a man ranch and share him with nine other women. Also, he's basically a slave, because who else is going to do the heavy labor?

And she has a kid. Poor child.

St. Estephe said...

For those who wish to explore the history of the pathology under consideration further, I recommend:

Marie Petti, British “Ultra-feminist - 1922
http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.com/2013/09/marie-petti-british-ultra-feminist-1922.html

Misandric Fixation
http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.com/2012/02/what-is-misandric-fixation.html

Crowhill said...

organizing a week where all men call in sick would be more than enough to cure feminism

In a rational world, yes, but I wouldn't expect a rational response from the feminists. They might want a new "Rosie the Riveter" campaign.

Salt said...

General "Buck" Turgidson: Doctor, you mentioned the ratio of ten women to each man. Now, wouldn't that necessitate the abandonment of the so-called monogamous sexual relationship, I mean, as far as men were concerned?

Dr. Strangelove: Regrettably, yes. But it is, you know, a sacrifice required for the future of the human race. I hasten to add that since each man will be required to do prodigious... service along these lines, the women will have to be selected for their sexual characteristics which will have to be of a highly stimulating nature.

Ambassador de Sadesky: I must confess, you have an astonishingly good idea there, Doctor.


Cataline Sergius said...

Cataline thanks the 9 of you that will make a more Cataline friendly world possible. I and the ladies appreciate, truly we do.

Yohami said...

"It'll require the re-teaching of everyone"

Then it's destined to fail.

"You should react to a feminist the way a Jew does when he learns someone is a National Socialist"

Ditto.

Doom said...

Oh? Hehe. I don't even care.

No, actually, right on. I hope, after I am gone, preferably in some place that deserves it more than the US, her dream is made manifest and she is somehow alive to "enjoy" it, forced to live in it, and known as the architect of it. Much as I hope she lives forever. It's the only types of blessings I can offer such.

Laguna Beach Fogey said...

Funny how this kind of Leftist thinking always leads to slaughter in the end. At least mass murderers are honest about their intentions.

Something tells me it isn't all men she has in mind here, but only a certain type, or race, if you will.

Laughingdog said...

If equality requires 9 women for every man, then she's admitting that it takes 9 women to accomplish what one man can do. But I doubt she realizes that's the message she's sending.

Bob Wallace said...

"organizing a week where all men call in sick would be more than enough to cure feminism"

How about one hour? Imagine no water or electricity!

sigbouncer said...

Mandingo's form a line to the left please. All others move towards the chambers and ovens on the right please. This will only take a few minutes.

Thank You - The Femithiest

Feather Blade said...

I'm afraid the only rational response to this is "What in hell are you smoking?"

Miguel D'Anconia said...

What a mind numbingly stupid bitch. Hopefully she'll self-cull.

Remo said...

Considering this femtopia of men exterminating themselves would need to be engineered, managed, and maintained by men to even have a hope of functioning how is that supposed to work exactly? Feminist problem: we don't like snakes. Hmmm... a toughie.... "I know we'll all the snakes eat their own tails and and work with the other snakes to do it too then expand the program and have the snakes that have devoured their own tails manage and guide those who still need to do it." What could go wrong? There is nothing more amusing than to see a feminist stand on the shoulders of giants and proclaim she's tall - then take the first step off because she doesn't need a MAN to stand on her own two feet! Falling... falling... splat.

Krul said...

So "the maths has already been done", eh? How reassuring.

Does she ever explain the benefits of her plan to reorder society in the image of a pride of lions, where a small minority of Alpha males preside in languid luxury over servile female majority? Or does she just consider elimination of all the betas, deltas, gammas, and omegas a self-evident good?

Owen said...

A person who wants to reduce a population of any demographic by 90% really wants total extermination. "10%" is window dresing.

vashine said...

Feminism, like Marxism, is rooted in humanism. "Truth" and "justice" are therefore derived solely from the human being, and always therefore become tyrannical. This is why feminism is evil. Anything not rooted in the God of Abraham and His Truth, His Law, is evil.

CarpeOro said...

"Children should be raised communally and by the state. The nuclear family model is a breeding ground of deceptions, mediocrities, treacheries, hypocrisy, and violence."

You know, in a sane world she would be given the kind of help she needs - not to implement her plan but to deal with her illness. I'll say a prayer that happens, but in this fallen world she is more likely to have her madness fed then dealt with.

CarpeOro said...

Oh, and sadly it appears she has reproduced. The child is alive because it is female, but I am sure she will suffer years of her mother's insanity without intervention. Definitely a need for prayer for that child.

b1bae96e-6447-11e3-b6bb-000f20980440 said...

I thought about how the 10 to 1 ratio would play out long term, and it seems to me that the result would be that the bottom 2/3rds of women would be wiped out in short order as the top 1/3rd of women didn't feel like sharing.

I think 200 years out what we are looking at is a planet wide reduction of the human species by about 75% with a male to female ratio around 2:3, and if that is the ultimate end game. Why not just allow New World style Colonization where in-groups are allowed to just exterminate whatever undesirables are on land they would like to use.

Corvinus said...

There's an argument that polygamy is fundamentally a feminist, woman-instigated phenomenon. This doesn't really help change my mind about that point.

Needless to say, she probably means to cull the BETAs and leave a small number of ALPHAs.

This also goes further in helping to explain the weird feminist/Muslim alliance.

Corvinus said...

Considering that feminism is a dysgenic philosophy that has already led to a statistically significant decline of human intelligence, this sounds like a perfect recipe for a return to the caves.

I also will note that it seems to be an iron-clad rule that polygamous societies have lower IQs than monogamous societies. I don't know of any exceptions to that rule.

tweell said...

Here's a Pink SF author's take on the theme that was interesting:

http://www.amazon.com/Brothers-Price-Wen-Spencer-ebook/dp/B000OIZU1M/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1408730691&sr=1-1&keywords=a+brother%27s+price

A world where men are 10% or less of the population - the author states that male babies are mostly still-born or miscarried, and alludes to it being disease related. Men are bought and sold, either living as virtual prisoners, 'married' to a group of sisters, or as drugged slaves chained to beds in 'manhouses'.

It's also a world of limited technology (mid 1800's) and resources (It takes a lot more women to run a farm or a mine). The author makes a happy ending for her hero, (he's bought by the ruling princesses) but the setting is rather grim. I was surprised that Wen Spencer had thought out the consequences of a man-shortage so well. As always, YMMV.

Mindstorm said...

The history shows that it's a dumb idea.

tacticaltoolbox said...

Funny enough, the 10% of men left to breed, dig ditches, repair things, open jar lids, etc. would no doubt realize their worth and turn the tables on the wymenz. It couldn't last long. If they drug the men into compliance, there won't be any civilization support. If they leave them lucid enough to support civilization (if that's even possible with women in charge), they'd overthrow.

Either way, a 90% population of women with the men kept in pens, tell me, who will drive the cars/airplanes?

Hammer6 Actual said...

Lovely Bride and I both had a good laugh on this one.

What immediately comes to mind is:
<1>Harems of women gathered around warlords who provide protection, order, and limited provision
<2>Some serious woman fighting for access to men

There is always a percentage of people that can be herded, but there will always be the ones who refuse the yoke and live 'outside the conventions'.

Sounds like a plot-line for a Gor book.

Retrenched said...

Funny how a man criticizing any female makes him a misogynist and disqualifies him from speaking on gender issues, but a woman calling for mass extermination of men doesn't disqualify her from speaking.

Yohami said...

Gives her instafame and mainstream interviews instead.

Robert What? said...

She doesn't seem to realize that she is in the overwhelming minority and that the majority of women in the world are not longing to become atheistic socialist feminists. Besides even if the men were 90% disappeared - many women would just up to be the predictors, and she'd still need men to protect her.

Nataliya Kochergova said...

I heard similar ideas from a few MRAs - either breed an excess of women, or genetically engineer newborn women to have male sexuality, making everybody happy. It's not a very popular idea, as far as I can tell, and probably would lead to unintended consequences if implemented, but there is nothing brutally inhumane about it.

dave1941 said...

Egg and dairy farmers have good reason to skew the sex ratio of the animals they own, yet they've found no way to do this other than killing off unwanted males in each generation. Any imbalance creates a natural incentive to bear offspring of the minority sex, quickly restoring the sexes to numerical parity.

Success or failure in reproduction is absolute, or relative to others of the same sex. In no case can one sex ever gain a collective advantage over the other. The real goal of feminism is equality among women -- if cute girls can be tricked into degrading themselves to the level of old hags, those who were already old hags might be able to score some dick. Too bad the cuties are wising up #WomenAgainstFeminism.

Nataliya Kochergova said...

She also apparently believes this:

"The purpose of living is merely to persist and perpetuate our species. If someone is willing to give you all you require to survive and live comfortably, simply because you exist, then you have already achieved all that truly matters."

No, that's not so easy. We have a hierarchy of needs. Once the basic ones are taken care of, we strive for meaning in our lives (look up Maslow's hierarchy of needs) . We want to belong, master skills, and have autonomy (look up the self-determination theory). And we don't even like equality all that much, as many of us are motivated by outcompeting others in something. We want to strive for something. Live meaningfully. Not everyone will have the same meaning, but being farmed like an animal in luxury will hardly satisfy us.

"Children should be raised communally and by the state. The nuclear family model is a breeding ground of deceptions, mediocrities, treacheries, hypocrisy, and violence. It needs to be abolished. Bigotry, prejudice, and antiquated convictions are passed down through each generation"

This is more of the same. If we can't even pass our values to our kids or parent them, what would motivate us to have them? This system of hers flies in the face of human nature in so many ways.

Mechanized said...

"Children should be raised communally and by the state."

It is extraordinary that an individual will freely acknowledge the potential violence that exists within a family (which is true whenever human beings interact) yet will flagrantly disregard the extreme mass violence that the state has and will perpetrate upon individuals. During the 20th century alone governments across the globe murdered a collective 150-200 million human beings, not to mention the endless numbers of individuals enduring torture, starvation, and general degradation and misery at its hands. Any potential violence that the nuclear family may possess pales in comparison.

Bubba said...

From five minutes of searching (and knowing country accents from way back) I can tell you that she's a little hillbilly gal from Paragould, AR with very, very serious daddy issues.

He died in 2007 when she was about 15 -- a very bad time for a girl's daddy to die, even if your daddy and mama were divorced.

She loves male attention, knows how to get it [you suckers!], and is hot to trot with the right guy.

I am surprised all you alpha guys couldn't figure this out.

Michael Maier said...

As I said elsewheres: "This should work just as well as every other Utopian idea that requires a reordering of society and a complete change of lifestyle of everyone on Earth."

Michael Maier said...

So Bubba is essentially saying "She needs it... in da butt".

Mindstorm said...

It would cause the rise of infectious cancers, for example. Less resistance to any new pandemic, and so on... definitely a dumb idea.

coachrelacional said...

She wants a world where the top 10% of alphas get 100% of women. Wait it is already happening.

Her hamster forgets that the other 90% of men she despises (the betas, gammas and omegas) are the ones who allow civilization to continue (i.e. they make the roads, operate oil rigs and power stations, design and build airplane turbines).

Post a Comment

NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.