VICE: I assume The Ratio refers to your belief the male population should be reduced to between by 90 percent.Considering that feminism is a dysgenic philosophy that has already led to a statistically significant decline of human intelligence, this sounds like a perfect recipe for a return to the caves. Feminism is not only insane, incoherent, and misandrist, it is avowedly misanthropic. It is literally anti-human. It must be eradicated, root-and-branch.
The Femitheist: I believe that conventional equality, with a 50/50 female-to-male ratio, is an inferior system. Essentially my ideas lead to men being made a special class—a far more valued class—having choice of a myriad of women due to the difference in sex ratio. That is my intention. Men would be made more valuable, and their quality of life would be dramatically improved. They would have a subsidised existence if you will, akin to going on an all-expenses paid vacation that lasts from birth to death.
Assuming people are down for that, how could you reduce the male population by that much? Are you talking culling or selective breeding over years?
Obviously men comprise a substantial portion of the victims of violent crime and participate heavily in war, so there will always be deaths there—but certainly not culling. I don't advocate selective slaughter or brutal processes.
So how would you achieve it?
Further research into designer babies will be necessary: manipulating gender or sex, prenatal sex discernment, sex-selective abortions, development of dual-female progeny (babies created from two mothers), and numerous other mechanisms will be utilised in order to achieve these aspirations. They won’t be enforced or mandated to achieve the goal in the short-term, but merely heavily encouraged in the early stages. Unless one opposes abortion, there's little ethical reason to find that too outrageous a proposition. The maths has already been done on all of the genetic and population-sustainment-related issues: population bottleneck, inbreeding, mutations, et cetera. Everything works out in favour of my ideas. I've been meticulous and cautious. I've had the work reviewed by people who are experts—or at least extremely knowledgeable—in biology and genetics, and I've received confirmation that it all works out.
That’s in theory, what about in practice?
It'll require the re-teaching of everyone—female and male—in classrooms, homes, through literature, media, art, and networks. It is a process that would take decades, generations, and perhaps even a few centuries. Nevertheless, these are things that should be done to forge a new and vastly superior world. My mission is to devise and describe a framework for the carrying out and success of such objectives.
Don't blithely accept it when women tell you that they are feminists. You should react to a feminist the way a Jew does when he learns someone is a National Socialist, or the way a self-made capitalist entrepeneur does to a card-carrying communist, with outrage and contempt. Feminism is pure and unrestrained evil, and feminists are anti-human monsters less sympathetic than the average Nazi.
At least the Nazis were eugenic. Feminism can't even surmount that exceedingly low bar.