A hard-hitting experiment has revealed how strangers react differently when seeing domestic abuse depending on the gender of the aggressor. A video filmed with hidden cameras at a London park shows a male actor attacking his ‘girlfriend’ in front of onlookers who immediately rush to help, with one shouting: ‘Oi mate, what's wrong with you?’ The man is told ‘someone will call the police if you carry on doing that to someone’, before a passer-by says to the woman: ‘You don't have to put up with that honey, he's not worth it’.No wonder Ray Rice is still being publicly pilloried for knocking out his fiance, despite the fact that the woman went on to marry him, the prosecutors struck a deal involving no jail time, and his lawyer has strongly implied that Rice was defending himself against a physical attack by his now-wife.
The experiment is then conducted with the same actors - but this time, the woman is the aggressor, attacking him and saying: ‘Don't try to walk away - listen to me when I'm talking to you.’
However, instead of reacting with shock, nobody watching even attempts to help the man. They actually seem rather entertained by the incident, stopping to stare and laughing about it.
One might wonder at the man's willingness to marry a woman who attacked him, but then, one tends to doubt he'll have any future trouble of that sort with her.
21 comments:
Reminiscent of this:
http://www.avoiceformen.com/misandry/abc2020-the-psychology-of-hate-abc2020/
Biased people rarely see their own bias.
This song immediately jumped into my head
http://youtu.be/QdykXAT19Go
I rather enjoy living in a world full of white knights, VD. In fact, one of the unfortunate aspects of feminism is that they arm us with our handy lists of rape prevention tips and send us out to walk in an ugly world. Once we are convinced that men are the enemy, we naturally turn to the government for protection. We're reaping the political implications right now.
We laugh at men being attacked, not because we don't care, but because we recognize the huge physical differences between men and women. Like it or not, when women attack someone so much more able to fight than they are, much of the world finds it amusing. It's also amusing when a guy tries to beat up a vending machine or kicks his car. Acts of irrationality make us laugh and women, by nature, tend to be more prone to irrationality.
"...one tends to doubt he'll have any future trouble of that sort with her.."
Why, in light of the nature of women and all we know about domestic violence, would you say that? The exact opposite is true. Women never submit out of fear. Never. Scare us and you don't get compliance, you get wild unpredictability and passive aggressive behavior.
That depends on how badly they are scared, GG. Even a woman won't stick her hand into a threshing machine twice.
I suspect the lady was trying to get her drama on and had the event cancelled in a manner beyond her control. No social boner for her= no reason to repeat. Unless she gets off on that kind of thing, in which case all bets are off.
I guess he can legally rape her. Right? I don't know, but payback is a motive.
"We laugh at men being attacked, not because we don't care, but because we recognize the huge physical differences between men and women."
I don't laugh at it, GG, any more than I'd laugh at seeing a 9 year-old kid push and hit his mother. The fact that the kid is smaller and more irrational than she is irrelevant. At least the mother is a lot more likely to get away with hitting back in public than a man struck by a woman would be.
The video in the news article reminded me of the video of a woman who started swinging at police in an IHOP and received a brutal punch in the face. At first I was outraged like many others were, but later realized that if it was a short, scrawny, drunk man trying to hit the police then I'd have no problem with them ending the fight with one hit. So now I just see it as equal treatment under the law.
"That depends on how badly they are scared, GG. Even a woman won't stick her hand into a threshing machine twice."
That's why the cops never go to the same house half a dozen times a week, right?
In the case of Ray Rice, it's a bit ironic, it could be the stupidity of cops that may convince her to align with him instead. After all, they arrested her, too...for being unconscious in an elevator.
Try defending yourself against a female -- verbally or otherwise -- and see what happens. Doesn't matter what she's done to you, or to anybody else. "Men" can't wait to beat you down, physically or using the Justsis Sistem. Finally, they get their Big Chance to show Mistress Mommy whatta big-boy he is! Look at me, look at me! Aren't I defending you well, Mommy? Aren't I a real man now?! Goona get me Shotgun and do some protectin', whoa I'm such a tough guy check me out. Oooh I just feel so STRONG AND MANLY!
And females love to see males put in their place, and to have female wickedness and rebellion enabled and enforced by their hired, and unhired, manlings. Same reason most U.S. films usually include a scene in which a female, any female, slaps or kicks or attacks a male. Circumstances are irrelevant. Plot is irrelevant. The point is to reinforce that Western males are ruled, and owned, by females. The ability to attack another w/o any fear of retribution is the signature of ownership. Males in the West live under soft slavery. Gettin less soft every day.
You can't be a politician, college president or official, judge, corporate head, cop, or anything else w/o submitting to the Male bad Woman good script. And this is the way pretty much everybody wants it, too, as that video proves ... not that proof at this point is needed. No Protections are protection enough for your females, even when they are engaged in evil. The Trial is over before it even begins.
All Hail the Almighty People! So courageous and so virtuous! Be seeing you in eternity.
Well, myself, I enjoyed Doorstop's video tremendously, so I suppose I'll just have to let women have their fun too.
"We laugh at men being attacked, not because we don't care, but because we recognize the huge physical differences between men and women."
Ah, the lengths to which we will go to put a happy face on male disposability and expendability.
And yes, I said 'we', not women. It's not a female thing, it's a human thing.
http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/03/21/the-fundamental-premise/
As long as eggs are expensive and sperm is cheap, the well-being of women will be of far more importance than the well-being of men.
Thing is, in times past men got special privileges and authority in exchange for the heavier burdens they had to bear. But thanks to feminism, women get to share in the benefits and privileges of manhood with none of the attending burdens and responsibilities that men have to deal with.
Women of all political stripes and religious backgrounds, deep down, want women to have all of the benefits of patriarchy and feminism with none of the costs and responsibilities, while saddling men with the costs and responsibilities of both systems and fewer of the benefits.
And then they wonder why men only want them for sex and nothing else.
After all, they arrested her, too...for being unconscious in an elevator.
Didn't she see the "No Loitering" sign?
"Ah, the lengths to which we will go to put a happy face on male disposability and expendability"
It doesn't have a happy face, it's really quite tragic. The worst part of all is that so many men seem to believe it about themselves.
"As long as eggs are expensive and sperm is cheap, the well-being of women will be of far more importance than the well-being of men."
Yes, but biology has far reaching implications that go way beyond reproduction. Men contribute so much more to the equation than simple sperm donation.
Eggs aren't that expensive. They're a natural resource. Ideas and their execution are expensive and those are historically male products. Ideas like marriage, written language, the wheel, etc.
The exact opposite is true. Women never submit out of fear. Never. Scare us and you don't get compliance, you get wild unpredictability and passive aggressive behavior.
You're either an idiot or a liar, GG. Either way, you are a perfect example of the reason for the rule to never listen to women on intersexual matters. Women submit instinctively and involuntarily out of fear. There was a clear illustration of this in the book on the Crusades I was reading just yesterday.
Vox Day, I'm neither an idiot nor a liar. You are of course, free to not listen to me. However, anybody foolish enough to think fear is what motivates women to submit, should probably learn to sleep with one eye open and stay away from the brownies, least you discover they contain horse laxatives.
I wonder how many of those laughing were thinking 'What a beta'.
All the supporters like to beat their chests about 'white knights' and 'disposable men' but are also the first to mock and belittle other men
NAGGALT!
Vox Day, I'm neither an idiot nor a liar.
Maybe not, but then that means you most certainly are delusional about women's behavior, and most likely, your own included.
Conscientia Republicae said...
NAGGALT!
And therewith... Conscientia Republicae wineths the Freakin' Thread...
NAGGALT!
The women love teh killaz.
lolllzlzlzl!
The women were atracted to him when he was the abuser.
Post a Comment
NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.