Sunday, August 4, 2013

"An epidemic of gold-digging whores"



"There is an epidemic of gold-digging whores in this country. And every night, I put on the news and I'm waiting for someone to address it! Every night, never see it. Every night I talk about gold-digging whores and the whole crowd pulls back like I'm talking about Bigfoot. Like I'm saying the Moon is made of cheese or something. I'm talking about whores, people! They're everywhere! How many? How many more great men are going to get chopped in half before we do something?"

The main reason for the epidemic is the solipsistic "just in case" aspect of the situation that causes good, responsible, non-gold diggers to support laws that make it possible for women to divorce-rape and asset-strip men.  Decent women support laws that benefit gold-digging whores for much the same reason decent blacks support gun control that benefits criminal black thugs.  Most women see the injustice in the family law system and they don't personally intend to benefit from it, but they dislike the idea that their friend, or their sister, or their mother, or their daughter, might find herself forced to suffer the consequences of her actions.

Just in case they find themselves in a situation where they would have to choose between divorce-raping their husbands and supporting themselves like the strong, independent women they are, well, they'd like the option to be there.  Just in case.

"There is nothing out there to help you handle becoming rich and famous.  There is nothing for that platoon of whores that is going to form on the horizon."

And some wonder why men are increasingly prone to going on strike.

37 comments:

Alexander Thompson said...

Notice how he still has to qualify it by throwing the guys under the bus before criticizing the women.

yttik said...

Seriously Vox, gold digging whores? I suppose that's easier to swallow than your "women as parasite" theme of last week. Have you ever considered consulting with a public relations specialist?? Perhaps one that knows what they're doing?

It's just a joke, Vox. Thanks for being so patient and persistent.

aeolipera said...

Edification aside, you have great taste in stand-up comedy.

Crowhill said...

When a man gets taken by a woman, we think "you dumb ass, you should have known better. You got what you deserved."

When a woman gets taken by a man, we think, "scum bag creep, he should be punished."

Rigel Kent said...

Though I am no mathematician long ago I came up with an equation of my own: Feminism=Bulls**t.

I came up with this equation when I realized that despite feminists talk about equality and women being able to stand on their own and all of the changes to the law they've managed to get made over the years, alimony still exists.

Not only does it exist but I've never even heard of an attempt to get rid of it from feminists. Hell, I've never even heard of a feminist speaking against the idea of alimony.

yttik said...

"Most women see the injustice in the family law system and they don't personally intend to benefit from it, but they dislike the idea that their friend, or their sister, or their mother, or their daughter, might find herself forced to suffer the consequences of her actions."

Dang! That resonates. I'll leave you men in peace and come back when my brain is finished exploding.

cybro said...

Don't be a gold-giver and you won't have to worry about gold-diggers.

Huggums said...

I don't know where you get this stuff sometimes. Black people support gun control because most are liberals and actually think it's going to work to get the guns out of the hands of the urban teenage gang members shooting each other in the street every day. If there is another push to keep guns out of the hands of the Zimmermanns and the type who shot that one black teen for playing his music too loud (haven't really read the details of the case), it's a recent one born from perception that white people can gun down any person of color for any reason and get away with it.

Your analogy also makes it sound as if most black people want gun control because they don't want themselves or someone they know killed while committing a crime. Of course, I can't speak for all black people and there are no doubt many who do think this way, but every time this issue comes up, references are always made to "stopping our children killing each other in the streets." "Our young people now have a problem with being 'disrespected.'" Every stated reason has to do with keeping young black males from shooting each other.

Of course, I live down south and come from a rural family. Many of my relatives hunt or are serving/have served in the military. They got guns and many other black men I know around here understand that you should have a gun for self-defense. Just a theory, but the gun control push may be a mostly urban black phenomenon.

Speaking for myself, I'm perfectly happy for any idiot who can't think of anything to do but play Knockout King or randomly attack some white person to be gunned down. Saves me the ammo and the trouble.

Vox said...

I don't know where you get this stuff sometimes.

Conversations with blacks and observations concerning some otherwise nonsensical responses to polls.

You know better than I do that there are often only a degree of separation between the fine upstanding African-American citizen and the black urban "knucklehead". Aside from NK Jemisin and some media commentators, I seldom hear of any blacks who are at all concerned about being gunned down themselves.

But they are concerned about various misguided individuals in their extended families being gunned down instead of merely imprisoned. And there are very, very few urban black extended families who don't have one or more members involved with the state or federal justice systems.

I suspect your position is different because you are both intelligent enough think through the entire matter and you "live down south and come from a rural family".

The "keeping young black males from killing each other" reason is obviously specious, in that none of those young black males have carry permits, or in most cases, legally acquired guns, in the first place.

However, you're right and there is no question that the gun control push is a mostly urban phenomenon, although given the enthusiasm of urban whites for it, that is something that cannot possibly be blamed on urban blacks alone.

it's a recent one born from perception that white people can gun down any person of color for any reason and get away with it.

Now, I wonder where they got THAT idea?

Vox said...

Huggums, at the risk of derailing this very important analysis of a comedian's schtick, what is your currently preferred theory for higher black crime rates?

You know mine is a combination of genetic and cultural factors leading to lower average time preferences, I'm just interested in knowing what yours happens to be.

Weouro said...

It's also that they run no risk of losing their children. If the kids were legally dad's by default, there would be a lot less female-initiated divorce.

fc6cedc2-d6a8-11e2-b860-000bcdcb471e said...

However, you're right and there is no question that the gun control push is a mostly urban phenomenon, although given the enthusiasm of urban whites for it, that is something that cannot possibly be blamed on urban blacks alone.

The white liberal logic goes something like, with CC criminals know they need a gun in order to commit a crime thus increasing the likelihood criminals will have guns.

As white liberals have no desire to walk around with a concealed weapon, they would prefer a status quo where criminals are less likely to be armed.

Brad Andrews said...

The problem with this video is that the audience just treated it as a big joke. It got his desired response, but that is a sad commentary in and of itself.

Stickwick Stapers said...

I have an acquaintance who is not the most scrupulous woman, and she tried to divorce-rape her third husband a couple of years ago. She really thought she was the victim in this scenario, despite the fact that she would undoubtedly consider herself an equally intelligent, resourceful, and dynamic businessperson as he was. The guy spent more on legal fees fighting her than the amount she wanted from him, and he won. She was flabbergasted that he wouldn't just pay her off, since it would cost him less than fighting it. The woman has zero concept of principle. It's good he fought instead of rolling over, although it's a shame it cost him so much to do so.

Most women see the injustice in the family law system and they don't personally intend to benefit from it, but they dislike the idea that their friend, or their sister, or their mother, or their daughter, might find herself forced to suffer the consequences of her actions.

FWIW, count me in the minority that supports a complete overhaul of the family law system.

With regard to marriage, there are two things feminist propaganda deliberately obfuscates, and those are: 1) most husbands are basically good, and despite women's shifting moods and desires, there is not often genuine justification for divorce; 2) in cases where divorce is justified, because the husband is genuinely bad, what about the woman's responsibility for marrying such a man in the first place? Feminists talk out of both sides of their mouths: women are smart and wise and strong and the equal of men in every way, but they are also victims of men who somehow fooled them into thinking they were good. (Or else these men inexplicably turned into Mr. Hyde a few years into marriage.) Can't have it both ways.

Huggums said...

"The "keeping young black males from killing each other" reason is obviously specious, in that none of those young black males have carry permits, or in most cases, legally acquired guns, in the first place."

Of course it is. Since when has that fact ever caused gun control advocates to reconsider their position? Since when has any monumentally obvious fact ever caused any of them to so much as bat an eye?

"Huggums, at the risk of derailing this very important analysis of a comedian's schtick, what is your currently preferred theory for higher black crime rates?

You know mine is a combination of genetic and cultural factors leading to lower average time preferences, I'm just interested in knowing what yours happens to be."

Pretty much the same, but I don't think the genetic influence is quite as strong as many believe it to be. I think that depending on the cultural environment and the existence of positive social pressure, just about any human trait can find a positive mode of expression.

The genetic issue can only really be "solved" with time. Of course, if white liberals are any indication, even if some environmental catastrophe or social upheaval pushed the next generations of black people towards civilization, once that civilization reaches it's apex, it will begin working feverishly to destroy itself. Either that or just start massacring its own citizens because of whatever thin-as-wet-tissue-paper reason it happens to come up with.

tz said...

The blacks in various places seem to have done what they did in Haiti. Given themselves over, sold their souls (literally, as in Faust, but without the poetry) to the Devil. Missionaries have lots of stories from Africa.

So I don't think it is Genetic. Culture has something to do with it, but with generational curses a possibility for the unbaptized (or worse those who are but then commit a mortal sin), they are about as hard to kill as kittens.

But confronted with the gates of hell, do you get out your battering ram or try to hope you won't end up across the border out of pride?

tz said...

Though I fear for the poor little Lambdas now that we have "gay marriage". It will be fun watching lesbian jello wrestling trying to rape/strip each other. For males, well, after the other post showing the transvestites, not so much.

Adds new meaning to "The Gay Divorcee"

Desperado Hollywoodscum said...

Related to alphagame but not necessarily the gold digging whores.

http://www.rightthisminute.com/video/megan-welter-az-cardinals-cheerleader-police-interview-arrest

I think you could start a series on the importance for guys to be ready to catch fights on video

yttik said...

"Most women see the injustice in the family law system..'

Yes. Twenty years ago I was the assistant director of our local domestic violence program. I was fired, three of us in one swoop, for asking one too many times, "but what about the menz?" Are we doing the right thing here? The golden rule in feminism is that you must focus exclusively on the women and never let your empathy stray towards the bigger picture. That will get you ejected from the sisterhood.

Once, my husband and I were driving down the coast because he was trying to surprise me with a weekend getaway. I couldn't stop questioning him, trying to start arguments, generally being a pain in the ass. He just wanted to give me a surprise and I couldn't even submit enough to receive that. He told me to shut up, to stop, because I was spoiling things, but I just couldn't. So he pulled over and duct taped my mouth shut and got back on the freeway. I would have just ripped it off, but it was caught in my hair and my ear rings. I was furious of course, and when he finally stopped for coffee and helped me with the tape, I was planning to steal the car and leave him stranded. I had to abandon that plan when I realized I didn't know how to drive a stick shift.

He made his point. He communicated with me in ways like that many, many times over the years. And I actually would rate him on a domestic violence continuum in my mind. He'd say, "sometimes I could just kill you," and I'd check off the little box that said, "makes death threats." I never called the cops because I have always been more afraid of them then I was of him. I did threaten to once and he simply handed me the phone. There was also sexual attraction, game going on, and I really didn't want the cops to end it before I understood what was happening to me.

So gentlemen, I now understand that my husband took a huge risk with me. He gambled and he won, but he could have just as easily lost.

I told you when I first came here that the success of our marriage was 70% him and his game. That's because it sure as hell wasn't based on me cooperating, not consciously at least.

mmaier2112 said...

" I had to abandon that plan when I realized I didn't know how to drive a stick shift."

I am LOL'ing like a retard watching The 3 Stooges right now.

Remo said...

yttik - hearing your story and assuming its true illustrates why most men should leave the United States. Yes your hubby gamed you well but ultimately *you* were holding the trump card. The police would have beta'd him in front of you no questions asked then the hamster would have rationalized your decision later because, seeing him submissive before the blue gun thugs, you wouldn't be attracted to him anymore.

The only way out for an "alpha" at that point to excite your loins is to -kill- the police and beat you up for calling them. So your tingle would be satisfied until the SWAT guys showed up to kill him, whereupon you would cry. This is a rather high price to pay for your nights entertainment don't you think, yet every man in the U.S. who is married is potentially in the situation I just described.

NATHANIEL MANELLA said...

I like Bill Burr more and more the more I hear him. This isn't as good as his impromptu rip on Philadelphia, but still up there

SarahsDaughter said...

yttik,
I'm enjoying reading more about these moments in your life. I've had similar ;).

While I know legally what Remo stated is true, that we've held the trump card, there's this shared phenomenon that yttik states: "There was also sexual attraction"...

Markku said...

One has to always have a contingency plan for the (possibly very sudden) scenario that she decides she wants to destroy you, and her own children if there are any. Obviously it is a bit difficult to plan for that, and still have affection for her, but luckily men are better at compartmentalizing.

It can obviously never be perfect, though.

PVW said...

@Vox and Huggums. I have some information that I think will further explain this urban perspective.

They know that it is harder for the criminals to get guns legally in the northern urban environments--the gun control laws are tighter--and that as a result, the guns they use are likely to be illegal. However, they believe the problem is that the criminals are getting guns from out of state, so they support gun control on the whole, and on the national level:

http://www.nyc.gov/portal/site/nycgov/menuitem.c0935b9a57bb4ef3daf2f1c701c789a0/index.jsp?pageID=mayor_press_release&catID=1194&doc_name=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nyc.gov%2Fhtml%2Fom%2Fhtml%2F2013b%2Fpr263-13.html&cc=unused1978&rc=1194&ndi=1

If nobody has any guns, it is likely the criminals will not be able to get them at all. The NRA has fought this, of course.

yttik said...

Remo is quite correct of course, but I suppose that is why I find game so magical. I fancy it as a intelligently designed fail safe, whose specific purpose was to keep us from descending into complete savagery or at least to slow the process. There is an escape hatch, there is a way home.

"This is a rather high price to pay for your nights entertainment don't you think.."

Yes, yes I do. I think it's a rotten deal. It appears as if women have destroyed paradise again. Would you mind fixing it? And will you fix it while I stand here and continuously whine about how men are always trying to fix things??

yttik said...

Remo, last week I broke the dishwasher doing exactly what my husband told me not to. Again. I couldn't do much but look at him sheepishly and say, "I'm sorry honey, would you mind fixing it?" He just stared at me and I could see the thoughts going through his head. "I'm married to a moron. You broke it, you fix it! She's not qualified to fix it. I should just make her wash dishes by hand. But if I don't fix it, the kitchen will descend into savagery and I'll have to suffer along with everyone else. I'm tired and this is a rotten deal."

Needless to say, fixing society is a bit more complicated than fixing a dishwasher.

PVW said...

And of course, the story from earlier this year showing the absurdity of the gun control view, a newspaper in a northern suburban location that published the names of legal gun owners, because legal gun owners are supposedly the problem behind gun violence and gun owners are probably all crazy:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/07/nyregion/after-pinpointing-gun-owners-journal-news-is-a-target.html?pagewanted=all

msa82885 said...

YTTIK you're annoying and stupid. I'd normally ignore such an obvious attention whore but I can't contain my hatred of the you. I hope your husband murders you and hides your remains in dog food.

yttik said...

Why thank you, dear. He may indeed hide my remains in dog food someday.

Attention whore is not a nice way of putting it and not completely accurate, but I don't dispute the underlying truth to that. I'll chill out soon.

Remo said...

msa# - that's a little harsh. Although I still am on the fence if yttik is a troll I have to admit it's entertaining to hear these stories. Troll? Possibly - I have never seen or heard a woman admit to what "she" has admitted and it would hardly surprise me to here it is either extreme sarcasm or some man in his mother's basement trying to create the illusion that there is a woman, somewhere, who is actually aware of her contribution to any marital strife. To be honest this sounds too good to be true - yes she does the things that make men pissed off BUT she accepts correction without calling the police and screaming "He ABUSES me!!!" before claiming she's independent after running home to daddy and demanding her lawyer divorce rape her husband so she never has to work again. That is the bulk of women in the U.S. now.

I maintain that marriage will be in jeopardy anywhere in the world where a man cannot simply say "OUT" and mean it without a SWAT team showing up. Loss of children, comfortable bed, starvation, and being alone on the street and therefore subject to rape or death by exposure has a way of taming the hamster and stopping the shit tests. While some men have historically abused this, most have not. The same cannot be said for women when given this power.

yttik said...

"msa# - that's a little harsh."

It is a bit harsh, Remo, but I now rather shamelessly accept what Vox has laid out so well, "It is said that the heart wants what it wants. And what the female heart wants is more."

I am not a troll. I have been on a long journey into submission, searching for a missing puzzle piece. I knew if I could just find the right intellectual leadership, I would finally discover it. What you are witnessing is a bit like an intellectual climax, messy, a bit embarrassing, but quite delightful.

As time goes by, I will try to walk the fine line between being a complete attention whore and providing you with enough personal details to show you that I am genuine and for real.

Weouro said...

My experience of women would indicate that some don't need duct tape attacks or a slap across the face on the side of the road after opening the door at 50 mph for some reason. Ha! Maybe you're unusual in being very out of control, getting totally owned and then becoming very submissive. Seems like a bigger swing than average. Maybe most women don't need as much of that full arc.

I think with a lot of women a man can demolish resistance at lower levels that don't risk as much re police involvement even if it does seem less sexy. One older guy I know told me he had to slap his wife once because she was caught in a hysterical rage, but only the once in their whole marriage.

Stickwick Stapers said...

I think with a lot of women a man can demolish resistance at lower levels that don't risk as much re police involvement even if it does seem less sexy.

Yes, but please don't assume that every woman finds risking police involvement sexy. A lot of us have a way lower threshold for excitement.

Some men are hooked on adrenaline, and so they pursue extreme sports. The kind of behavior yttik is describing sounds like the female equivalent. Way too high-maintenance for most men in the long-term -- to the point of possible neurosis -- and I suspect even an Alpha would find it tiresome after a while.

yttik said...

Yes, Stickwick, it occurs to me that telling the truth may be a bit off putting to men, but than again, they already know there are women like me out there, right? They've seen the you tube videos.

I am speaking only for myself, only my truth, not for all women. There are probably kind and gentle women out there, who do not need to be tackled by a freight train before they can see the obvious. Be gentle with them.

Regardless, it has been 20 years since I was so high maintenance. Today everything is far more relaxed, far more playful. My husband doesn't have to do much to gain my compliance anymore. Today it often takes nothing more than a look in my direction or a raised eyebrow and I get it. Immediately. Last night I got dressed to go out with some girlfriends, felt his eyes on me, and realized he was telling me that what I was wearing was not quite the Back-The-Hell-Off dress I thought it was. So I told him I'd change, he smiled, and that was that. He didn't have to say a word, I am now intuitive enough to know what he wants.

Weouro said...

But I wonder if it's somehow more rewarding to tame a shrew. In that play, if I remember right, the shrew was the only one of the wives who was finally submissive.

pdwalker said...

Bill was speaking from the heart, with a touch of comedy to soften the message.

Post a Comment

NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.