Saturday, July 8, 2017

Game spreads to the mainstream

Of course, it's not as if I didn't predict this nearly 10 years ago, when I saw the male-female imbalance developing at the universities. And it's not Darwinism, it is Game.
While it’s commonplace for snooty, liberal academics to blame men for every misery to betide humanity, boffins at Yale have taken this sexist blame-game to absurd new heights.

They are claiming that modern men are too stupid – or “feel threatened by their success” – to date 30-something “selfish career women,” who are increasingly having to freeze their eggs until they meet men they deem worthy of siring their children.

That is the conclusion of a Yale study that interviewed 150 women at eight IVF clinics in America and Israel – and experts admit the trend is identical in the UK.

With 81% having a college degree, in more than 90% of cases, these women were buying extra time because they were experiencing a “dearth of educated men”. Academics blamed this not on “selfish career women” but instead “sweeping social changes” and, of course, men.

The tantalisingly-named Marcia Inhorn, Professor of Anthropology at Yale University, said, “There is a major gap – they are literally missing men. In simple terms, this is about an oversupply of educated women”.

Using all her mighty intellect, Prof Inhorn proffered, “Maybe women need to be prepared to be more open to the idea of a relationship with someone not as educated”.

At this point, most men will probably be face-palming to the point of whiplash, slugging scotch directly from the bottle or changing their Tinder settings to exclude late-30s careerists.
There is no two ways around it. Overeducating women is bad for society. There is a reason women weren't historically schooled past an eighth-grade education. Hypergamy means most of the intelligent and highly-educated women will never marry or have children, guaranteeing that the next generation will be less intelligent than the previous one. It is a disastrously dysgenic social policy.

22 comments:

Mr.MantraMan said...

Taki once commented that women in his mother's generation were not educated because that increased the likelihood they would become prostitutes.

Tatooine Sharpshooters' Club said...

I was long a complete blue-pilled moron, but even back in the day, when I was a high school sophomore and a girl first said "men are intimidated by my intelligence", my unedited initial reaction was "That's a bunch of bullshit." Of course, she was an archetypal SJW long before the name existed, and she wasn't a quarter as smart as she thought she was.

dc.sunsets said...

I cringe every time I hear someone's daughter intends to major in anything other than El Ed. In truth, given the absurd cost of a degree, every young woman will feel compelled to spend her best, most fertile years working to justify the cost.

Only a few will marry so well that their new husbands just pay off the student loans as a kind of reverse-dowry.

The collapse of this 36 year insane paradigm can't arrive soon enough.

dc.sunsets said...

@ Mr. MantraMan
Taki once commented that women in his mother's generation were not educated because that increased the likelihood they would become prostitutes.

Today that's called "the full college experience," no?

Michael Maier said...

"she wasn't a quarter as smart as she thought she was."

44 years, I've never been impressed by a woman's intelligence in person. Still not convinced SB or Stickwick aren't sock puppets so they don't count.

liberranter said...

Hypergamy means most of the intelligent and highly-educated women will never marry or have children, guaranteeing that the next generation will be less intelligent than the previous one. It is a disastrously dysgenic social policy.

Dysgenesis is, of course, "their" goal.

Days of Broken Arrows said...

Can someone explain how men will get their skulls bashed in sports, run into burning buildings, and fight wars in hostile, distant lands yet are "intimidated" by a woman who took a few classes?

Most men know instinctively that career women mean trouble down the road. When Forbes scriber Michael Noer wrote an article on this subject in 2006, the outrage from women was so immense that the article was removed, then put back with a "counterpoint" by a feminist.

Who was "intimidated" then? Methinks the whole intimidation accusation is a case of projection. Here is a link to Noer's article, which has stood the test of time: https://www.forbes.com/2006/08/21/careers-marriage-dating_cx_mn_0821women.html


S. Thermite said...

Was talking about this to a girl the other day, about most women wanting to marry up, and she scoffed about stereotypes (her own desires notwithstanding). NAWALT, even if she might be like that herself, doncha know.

I pointed out that she'd be starving if she'd chosen marketing as a career and didn't believe in the accuracy of stereotypes. I think it sunk in a little then, but really, what's the point of arguing with a woman at all? Their value to society and to us men has never been their limited critical thinking skills

manuel hernandez said...

Big difference between what a career means to a man and what it means to a woman.
To a man, a career is more a means to an end than anything. And that means providing a decent living for a family while contributing resources and skills to the community at large. And why not, enjoy what you do, be it installing a new A/C system, performing open heart surgery, building cabinets for a spanking new hotel, etc.

With women, the career IS the end. Nothing more than an ego trip. The career to them is me, me, ME!. And that's why men don't want to marry them. Even a dimwit idiot like me who didn't pay six figures for a social justice related degree from Yale can figure it out.

modsquad said...

"Overeducating women is bad for society."

If you're not allowed to fuck up your own life, then what's the point of even being here? Society moves up and down like a toilet seat and it always will. Whenever things are going just right, people get bored and start throwing sand into the gears to see what will happen. Then they swear about machinery not working.

Sixty years ago land was cheap, cars were cool, we had 1/10 the police and 1/100 of the laws, and housewives were still getting drunk and stoned. Nobody remembers 1957, but the '20s were full of booze runners, organized crime, literally a complete lack of gun laws and firewagon social mores. Our imaginations surpass our creative outlets, so to compensate we use each other as fodder to build Frankensteins.

modsquad said...

...then we hunt down the monsters until they're gone, then we do it all over again.

Ron said...

Overeducating women is bad for society

No! You are missing the point! This is a feature not a bug!

The intention is to make women unmarriagable to the vast majority of men so that the "Yale boffins" will have more access to women

Mr.MantraMan said...

Just another demographic to add to the howling D party mob. The cucks are already writing their surrender speech but the alt-right will be trolling and triggering this mob of harpies so they melt down.

Matt said...

Educated women are morons.

Aeoli Pera said...

"Good luck with that kids, I got mine!"

-Every Boomer

Mr.MantraMan said...

NABALT

Matthew Morgan said...

“Maybe women need to be prepared to be more open to the idea of a relationship with someone not as educated”.

And that's only fair, since for 50 years, men have had to be open to the idea of relationships with single moms, divorcees, high N counts, etc.

Feather Blade said...

To be fair, most people, regardless of sex, didn't get educated beyond 8th grade, unless they were going into Law, Medicine, or Teaching.

Tom K. said...

"You can't make me have babies when I'm young and fertile! You can't stop me having babies when I'm old and dried up!

Leftist/Liberals/Feminists seem to thing screaming invectives at Laws of Nature is somehow qualitatively different than screaming invectives at God, Himself. It's not. For there is both Nature and Nature's God.

Tom K. said...

"Hypergamy means most of the intelligent and highly-educated women will never marry or have children, guaranteeing that the next generation will be less intelligent than the previous one. It is a disastrously dysgenic social policy."

That's also one reason MILO says he's against gay marriage. He said gays tend to have higher IQs than the general society and when they married heterosexually they had children and passed those genes on. Now, however, he says, gays will not be marrying and having their own children and so the gene pool is less intelligent.

I don't know if I agree with his first premise, but his argument is valid. As is Vox's in re higher IQ women not reproducing.

JP said...

You know, I wouldn't even buy a car that has had more than one owner. Why would I want to date a woman past her prime who has been with hundreds of guys?

Stg58/Animal Mother said...

I've been having some solid entertainment with the posts about the NYPD lady officer who was shot in the head. I comment that if she'd been at home with her twin babies, she'd still be alive. You can hear the shrieking female outrage from a mile away, then the earth shakes from the massed White Knight cavalry charge.

Post a Comment

NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.