Friday, December 16, 2016

Gamma is as gamma does

Earlier this week, I banned a monomaniac calling himself Wild Man from VP, since he was prone to intellectual dishonesty and insufficiently tall for the ride there. The wisdom of that decision was subsequently proved by his all-too-typical response of the gamma scorned, which was to a) continue trying to spread his gospel of Western egalitarianism while b) bitterly complaining about the wrongs done to him in a revisionist account of events.

Of course, he picked the wrong venue for this when he decided to run to the sympathetic embrace of the readers at Chateau Heartiste. This is what a classic Gamma run-for-sympathy looks like:


Lucius Somesuch
Having read your “existential ontological” scribblings at Vox Popoli, Wild Man, with all of your buttkissing “please help me to understand, Good Sir” bowing and scraping, we see what a (((cucky))) midwit trolltard you are.

John Locke is dead. You’re a fucking idiot.

Oh, but a liar too– saruh is that YOU?! lzolzoz . . .


Wild Man
Lucius Fuckwad – you be so dumb …… to confuse the shiv for buttkissing. What else goes over you head buddy? Fuck ….. I bet you be owned by the women in you life.

John Locke inconsequential as to western institutions? …… fuck you stupid (like Beale).


Hesiod
Wild Dude, you got your arse handed to you by Vox Day. Retreating to another blog to cry your gamma dreams of being the once and future king were unjustly robbed does you no good. It’s embarrassing, in fact.


Wild Man
Hesiod – VD didn’t engage – just goes girl-like hissy-fits, except where he tries to counter claim in the most inane way, which is not actually even worthy of sorting out for him it is such nonsense (penguins and satellites are not categorically similar!? -so fucking what; corporations don’t die!? – so fucking what; but forms of life do!? – so fucking what; cognitive science specifically denies even the theoretical possibility of conscious self-agency!? – which is untrue, and besides the point in any event , because the condition of “belief” that I hi-lighted in that respect makes clear the intended phenomeno-ontological aspects of self-agency I was hi-lighting). VD completely misses every point. Voom – goes completely over his head – and I’m apparently the idiot. Hahaha – that be just too rich! His lame attempts for counter claim all fell completely, flat – really stinky-like. I grok that VD has a big problem with respect to understanding information-systems algorithmic approaches – calling for nested categorizations. I think his grasp of logic is actually back somewhere pre-Greek (which is really funny, because he does think he can make claims around the nature of the Graeco-Roman legacy – but apparently he doesn’t have the philosophical chops for that).

Look Hesiod. I was pretty shocked when I saw his post this morning with respect to some of my comments. His handling of the subject matter was just so utterly inept I actually felt bad for the guy (cause you know he is always so much about muh IQ all the time). So …… to ease the discussion towards an equitable (hahaha – VD hates that word) conclusion ….. I ignored the inanity for the time being, and refocused his attention to the one question that just might allow him to see the light (the question around his Alt-Right claims on the Christian legacy). And he freaked again, went all hissy-fit again, and banned me, and avoided the question for the 3rd time. Because he can’t answer the question without modifying one part or the other of his overall narrative. That’s why he didn’t answer. Hesoid – watch – he won’t ever answer that question. To prove it to yourself why don’t you ask him again to see what happens? (the question I put to him at the end of my comment #71). And it’s all because he is a white supremist who wants to pretend he is better than that. So he will fuck himself logic-wise just for the sake of some feelz around virtue-signalling. Jeez – that just be lowly for a man to do.

Hesiod – your man is a poser. That is pathetic. And fuck-off on the gamma shit. I outlined my reasons for posting here as per the first sentence of the first of my comments on this thread.


I leave it to you to decide if I a) failed to engage, b) just went girl-like hissy fits, c) completely missed every point, or d) am a white supremist who wants to pretend I is better than that.

23 comments:

Dexter said...

Cargo cult intellectual: "if I use lots of big intimidating words, people will think my imitation of a smart guy is real and will give me the respect they give smart guys."

Boko Harambe said...

Another tell: using your given name constantly, as though that unmasks you somehow and proves his superiority in outing you.

And at Chateau he comes off sounding afrointellectual in post one, then all high-and-Harvard-mighty in the next. BPD much?

dc.sunsets said...

Viewing this individual's rants causes me to question my assumption that pornography is the primary vice enabled by the Internet.

Is this what happens when someone gets "unfriended" by everyone on FB? (I don't, and never will, have a FB account, so this is just conjecture.)

Bard said...

Classic.

Bard said...

Classic.

JCclimber said...

mid wit is the correct diagnosis.

They truly seem to be the most irritating of creatures.

Women often play the same game, but at least when you ascertain what you're dealing with there, it isn't such a killer of their standing as a human. Because they are more in alignment with their sex's natural inclinations.

Laguna Beach Fogey said...

So much drama.

Jew613 said...

Wildman's posts are mind numbingly boring.

Wildman since it's very likely your reading this. Vox has a series on this very blog on breaking out of Gamma and rising to Delta. For your own sake read them and give it a try. Your life can only improve because no matter what you tell yourself when you look in the mirror you know your not a secret king and no amount of lying will ever change that.

Sean said...

I tried, and tried again, to care about the Wild Man interaction. Was tempted to try again, but petechial hemorrhaging indicated this might be unwise.

luciussomesuch said...

Lolzlzlolzl

"And at Chateau he comes off sounding afrointellectual in post one, then all high-and-Harvard-mighty in the next. BPD much?"

--I don't know if the saruh reference is too much inside baseball for non-chateau regulars, but this is a prominent troll at heartiste (occasionally sighted at other blogs) who is very aptly described by this line. Though I suspect it knows it's gaslighting (one of its favorite lines is that Europe is doomed to accept Islamo-Afro colonization because "it lacks transportation infrastructure"--?!?!!), it careens wildly from inept glad-handing to pretentious academese (I suspect a stint at some CUNY in some cobbled-up interdisciplinary major: by turns the schmuck tries to sound learned at linguistics, geography, and social psychology, but makes a hash of everything and then completely blows its cool).

There's a case to be made saruh is indeed some sort of tragic mulatto, but at her screechiest you can almost smell the juices flowing and so I prefer to call her such. It's a "win-win" either way. She's also adopted such a tangled position vis-à-vis the JQ she's now presenting herself as a Holocaust denier while still practicing philo-Semitism--and remarkably, she takes vastly greater exception to being called Jewish than to being called a girl.

Wild Man's performance certainly has echoes of the same shuck-and-jive. Paid or self-appointed? Are all the trolls high on drugs all the time?

VFM #7634 said...

There are a few regular leftard gamma trolls at CH that I know of. (((Divine Son of Kek))), Rick, and uh are the most prolific and ongoing. Strangely enough, the former two showed up about the same time Strapon Within vanished, which was around Election Day.

I saw Wild Man's logorrhea, but didn't really feel like replying for a while. Finally, feeling particularly nice at the moment, I said he was being OCD and that "white supremacist" is a term of abuse as meaningless and valid as "racist".

VFM #7634 said...

@luciussomesuch

I've seen you repeatedly use uh (saruh) as a chewtoy much as Greg Eliot and others did with Strappy, but uh's posts are generally so long-winded I've never bothered reading them. I eventually understood.

Aeoli Pera said...

Gammas write the most unreadable garbage.

Keyser Soze said...

Clearly gamma. Look at the ratio of his words to all others - 10:1. Something very feminine about that. Almost like an unhinged woman was responding.

Happy Housewife said...

"Of course, he picked the wrong venue for this when he decided to run to the sympathetic embrace of the readers at Chateau Heartiste"

Oh, dear. Talk about feeding time at the zoo...

Ned said...

"You be so dumb - to confuse the shiv for buttkissing." Talk about cutting one's own legs off, and not coming close to comprehending....

CarpeOro said...

I didn't bother to comment on the thread referencing him on VP. Just didn't feel like there was anything left to say. This latest entry in his internal saga just reinforces the vibe of the Damon Wayans character he created on "In Living Color" that would use large words without understanding what they really meant.

tweell said...

Uh oh, Vox, Wild Man has been backed up by insanitybytes22! I guess it's over now...

Bwhahahahaha!

Thanks for the validation of Wild Man as one of your own, insanitybytes! You girls go have fun now.

Leo Littlebook in Shenzhen said...

Guess I was wrong. It sounded like a stupid pretentious white midwit on VP, but on Chateau it sounds like a hater mulatto. Guess it was feigning respectability.

Jed Mask said...

Hmmm... Gamma,gamma! Gobble, gobble! Amen!

therationalmale.com said...

Wild Man (and all of his many aliases) has the dubious honor of being one of only 4 people ever perma-banned from The Rational Male for his relentless spamming of pseudo-spiritual egalitarian mental cotton candy.

I'm now reminded of the wisdom of that ban.

Billy Boy said...

lol I can't believe I wasted my time arguing with that faggot

Resident Moron™ said...

You leave it to me? (snicker)

I only read one of his comments. I'm happy for you to keep reading the idiots so I don't have to.

Post a Comment

NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.