The defense of the West is going to rely primarily, if not entirely, on the Men of the West, because it is becoming increasingly clear that very few women
are willing to say anything that might lead to them being criticized for departing from the SJW Narrative:
Three teenage girls colluded to cover up sex assaults against them because they felt bad for their attackers and didn’t want to see them “discriminated against”.
Pupils at the Herder school in Kassel, Germany have been subjected to months of sexual assault by “much older” migrant males on their way to and from school, dating back as far as September 2015. The three girls aged between 16 and 18 were repeatedly touched inappropriately and verbally abused, but they refused to report the incidents to the police or their school because the perpetrators were “refugees”.
The crazy thing is that many men genuinely worry about how their words and actions will be interpreted by those who won't even condemn their own sexual assailants. But how they are brainwashed into silence is no mystery.
These children are not the first to lie about sexual abuse because it doesn’t fit the mainstream narrative about defenceless, and peaceful refugees. Breitbart London reported on the case of a young female no-borders activist who was gang raped by Sudanese migrants in the shower block of a camp on the French-Italian border in 2015. The other migrants in the camp were having a party and playing music, so her cries were unheard.
Subsequently, after persuasion by other activists the woman decided not to report her rape because to do so would set back her dream of a borderless world. After she betrayed the political ideals of the other volunteers at the camp and reported the abuse, some of her fellow activists accused her of doing so out of “spite”.
37 comments:
I just saw that. Unbelievable. They deserve what's coming.
And Scalzi thinks men put upon women by smiling at them...
And to think... I used to wonder how men could possibly get away with treating women with utter contempt.
Well, DUHHH ... this is Germany we're talking about here. It's one of those words that's a synonym for "hopeless."
Matter o' fact, I don't think it's unreasonable to assert that Germany stopped qualifying as "western civilization" decades ago. Indeed, Germans themselves have long been making it pretty obvious that they're more than happy to commit collective ethnic suicide. If they don't care about themselves, who are we to waste energy doing it on their behalf?
Got any similar stories from any countries deserving of our concern?
This is how people behave under an occupation regime. Sadly, this behaviour is widespread across Europe. Arguably it's even worse in the US. Pathetic.
Germany deserves our concern.
We ground them into dust on behalf of the jews. We owe them.
Nope.....we don't owe Germany anything. Let them rot. Not a drop of Masculine blood.
We are bound to Germany by blood, culture, and history. Germany was the pinnacle of Western civilization, the best of the best, until the American-globalist occupation. The liberation of Germany is our liberation.
Creveld points out that throughout history women have played a critical role in motivating men to fight. Basically, women always said, "don't let the enemy tribe win, because they will defile us, your wives and daughters". Therefore it is extremely important to get Western women "on message" and shouting "protect us from the rapefugees!"
How to do this is a good question, especially because it would require Western women to concede to Western men a modicum of manly pride and to acknowledge that men are the natural protectors of women. This is of course counter to all the Grrlpower Strong Independent Womyn Don't Need Men feminist bullshit of the past 50 years.
@Fogey,
We have long and bitter experience backing people who lack the will to fight. South Vietnam, post-2003 Iraqi Army, etc. If a people is morally bankrupt then there's nothing you can do. Better to encourage those who still have spirit, e.g. Hungarians and Poles.
Again, Germany is an occupied country, Germans an oppressed people. Germany has a large and growing Nationalist movement that undertakes public demonstrations in the face of legal sanctions against nationalist expression. They're quite a bit more courageous than, say, the Americans in that respect. The conflict in Germany is a liberation struggle. It is one all Europeans--including those in North America--share.
Germans was subjected to horrific widespread reprisals at the end of WWII. I suspect this has had significant long lasting effects where those that would normally have passed down the "Stand up for yourself" ideal had it beaten, raped or tortured out of them, that's if they weren't outright killed.
Dexter said...
it would require Western women to concede to Western men a modicum of manly pride and to acknowledge that men are the natural protectors of women. This is of course counter to all the Grrlpower Strong Independent Womyn Don't Need Men feminist bullshit of the past 50 years.
you notice the goal for which they submitted to sexual violation?.
"to do so would set back her dream of a borderless world"
that's a 100% Marxist ideal, uniting the Proletariat.
destroy the Marxists in the indoctrination centers, sorry, "schools".
Germans have been undergoing the most complete national gaslighting ever seen for nearly seventy years. They have been told that the nazi's were the worst thing, the apex evil, of all history and that the holocaust was the tip of that apex, and that it was a manifestation of the German soul, with no provocation, reason or justification.
They will come around and they will fight. I still remember stepping off a train at a train station in Berlin in my 20's, looking around and wondering how in the hell we managed to win a war against these people. Orderly, tall, fit and attractive.
Europeans forming self-defense units:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/11/world/europe/vigilante-patrols-in-parts-of-europe-where-few-migrants-set-foot.html?_r=0
Again, Germany is an occupied country, Germans an oppressed people.
No more so than the US, UK, Canada, Australia, Scandinavia. They are all ruled by a traitorous elite that acts against the interest of their own people and that teaches their own people to hate themselves.
Awesome - I think we just stumbled on a brand new, highly effective form of game: "victim game". The woman is obligated to give you sex - even by force - because you are a victim of the right sort. If you are a normal, middle class professional black dude, you should definitely try masquerading as an African migrant. Just work on your accent and talk about the white oppressors. The average white girl will be putty in your hands to try to prove she is not like the other bad-whites. Being a normal hetero right wing white guy myself, I'm still trying to come up with a persuasive victim class. Can the fact that I am discriminated against by the entire government media complex be used effectively?
Women are natural authoritarians, so we disqualify, discredit and destroy the authority they obey, don't over think this.
Ask them point blank what authority they obey and then skull fuck that authority, why because we are shitlords that's why.
Looked at one country at a time, immigration and assimilation is a policy. Looked at globally, it is White genocide.
If any European professor said the same things about blacks, Orientals or Jews he routinely says about whites, he would be in prison.
Hatred is evil. But self-hatred is not only evil, it is also SICK.
The defense of the West is going to rely primarily, if not entirely, on the Men of the West, because it is becoming increasingly clear that very few women are willing to say anything that might lead to them being criticized for departing from the SJW Narrative:
I wouldn't expect women to fight for free speech/thought, and frankly I wouldn't want them to in almost any case. But when a woman changes her mind, it's instantaneous. There's little to nothing in the way of soul-searching, one minute it's "refugees welcome" and the next it's "I want to feel protected".
Creveld points out that throughout history women have played a critical role in motivating men to fight. Basically, women always said, "don't let the enemy tribe win, because they will defile us, your wives and daughters". Therefore it is extremely important to get Western women "on message" and shouting "protect us from the rapefugees!"
Glad to hear somebody smart was saying that, I was pulling it out of my ass...I mean intuition. Anyway, this is a good line of thought. Your concerns are overblown though. The hard-core feminists are lost forever and, as we've seen, not even gang rape will change their minds. But many women are not mentally ill like this, and may need to be encouraged to ask for help. If they see other women asking for help, and then things improve for those women, they'll be more likely to do it in mass.
Awesome - I think we just stumbled on a brand new, highly effective form of game: "victim game". The woman is obligated to give you sex - even by force - because you are a victim of the right sort. If you are a normal, middle class professional black dude, you should definitely try masquerading as an African migrant. Just work on your accent and talk about the white oppressors. The average white girl will be putty in your hands to try to prove she is not like the other bad-whites.
A disgusting proposition. But it would make a great comedy skit.
Three teenage girls colluded to cover up sex assaults against them because they felt bad for their attackers and didn’t want to see them “discriminated against”.
Could be just that or it could be the girls enjoyed being treated like sex objects
Also Germany declared war on the usa and did a great job of getting a lot White men killed before the usa jumped in. I cannot praise them for either acts of stupidity
"Also Germany declared war on the USA". Bullshit, bro learn some history. Not just what you were fed in government propaganda schools. It's quite simple, this is the age of Google. The same way the Spanish started the Spanish American War. The same way the Vietcong started The Vietnam War. The same way Germany started WWI.
Poor OL' USA. Everybody always picking on us, starting wars. Now Russia is trying to start a war with us by placing they're country right next to our NATO missile "defense shield".
@ Billy,
Yes, he is right--if he's speaking of WW2. Germany had a pact with Japan. Roosevelt's ruse what to goad Japan into attacking the US, so that when the US declared war on Japan, then Germany would have to declare war on the US, and then we could declare war on Germany. Pearl Harbor was the backdoor to get into the war in Europe.
Germany declared war on the US on Dec 11th, 1941.
From Wikipedia: "On December 11, 1941, the United States Congress declared war upon Germany (Pub.L. 77–331, Sess. 1, ch. 564, 55 Stat. 796), hours after Germany declared war on the United States following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.[1] The vote was 88-0 in the Senate and 393-0 in the House."
Laguna Bitch Faggy just wants others to do what he lacks the courage to do.
They will come around and they will fight. I still remember stepping off a train at a train station in Berlin in my 20's, looking around and wondering how in the hell we managed to win a war against these people. Orderly, tall, fit and attractive.
The Russians did the heavy lifting. They did the most dying, forced Germany to commit the bulk of her forces to the Eastern Front, and killed the most German troops by a factor of ten. The fighting on the Western Front, immortalized in the English-speaking world and as brutal as it was, was a sideshow. It's not where the war was decided.
We didn't win a war against these people.
"Also Germany declared war on the USA". Bullshit, bro learn some history.
This is nonsense. Germany declared war on the US because they were tricked by the Japanese. Japanese diplomats kept stringing the Germans along with hints the empire would soon get around to attacking Vladivostok and draw masses of Russian troops away from the European front and into East Asia.
Also, Hitler didn't believe the US public would support fighting in Europe until after Japan was subdued, which in his estimation would probably take a long, long time, and he wanted to officially attack (there were already undeclared attacks) US flagged shipping carrying supplies bound for the UK. He thought there was no downside and the potential for a big upside in a declaration of war on the US.
@ Bob
The Russians did the heavy lifting. They did the most dying, forced Germany to commit the bulk of her forces to the Eastern Front...
The Germans concentrated their forces there because they understood the nature of Communism and what would happen if the Communists won. The Germans were paying attention to the slaughter of Christians and other goy by the Judeo-Bolsheviks; they made the mistake of thinking Roosevelt and Churchill and Eisenhower were civilized not socialists themselves.
they made the mistake of thinking Roosevelt and Churchill and Eisenhower were civilized not socialists themselves.
If Churchill hasn't bombed civilian targets and just left the Germans alone (let alone help them with the eastern front) we'd still have ladies restrooms. The Germans wanted nothing to do with war with Britain or the U.S. GenX is the first generation to have any distance from WW2, so I expect, as we get into middle age and become more interested in history, there will be a shift in our understanding of the war.
We didn't win a war against these people.
Fair point.
Witness the overwhelmingly positive reaction to the new Hitler comedy ('Er ist wieder da') in Germany. Germans know the score.
@Unknown ~ All in good time.
@Aeoli Pera
Well it was tongue in cheek. But you are right. Would make a great comedy sketch. Don't expect it to be on SNL, though. They only do skits that are on narrative.
These three girls sound like Amanda Kijera:
http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2010/04/23/amanda-kijera-liberal-human-rights-activist-raped-in-haiti/comment-page-1/
Ok......the krauts were tricked by the slants.... doesn't say much for the krauts does it?
I don't give a damn about the jews killed by hitler, don't give a damn if the holocaust is a hocus or not but there is no doubt the germans mostly killed
other Christian White men so fuck em. And that is not including how germans vote and their prominent role in driving the usa to the left starting with the ones who came here after the failed rebellion of 1848 and helped kick start the GOP/ damnyankee rush for consolidated federal power
I hate the usa, as all Southern White men should but the truth is the truth and the krauts have been bad for the West in Europe and bad for the concept of limited government power and sovereignty of the individual White man
Tonsplace, you pull together some interesting threads.
I am less than willing to grant the Germans the status of ultimate manliness. Granted the NAZI leadership was not the nation's best. But the German army fully earned a reputation for nastiness and brutality towards civilians in both world wars.
The Germans wanted nothing to do with war with Britain or the U.S.
A historical truth that the Establishment chroniclers seek to flush down the memory hole. Hitler was very much an admirer of the British Empire and saw Germany as basically ruling the world side by side with Britain. I read somewhere that Rudolf Hess told one of his British interrogators after landing in Britain that Hitler expressed deep shock and hurt that Britain chose to rise to Poland's defense in September 1939. Hitler only attacked Britain reluctantly, after Britain forced his hand. As evidenced by the fact that he ordered the Luftwaffe to essentially abandon its bombardment of Britain in the Spring of 1941 in order to have them prepare for Operation Barbaross (the invasion of the Soviet Union), war with Britain was not a priority for Hitler.
As for declaring war on the U.S. on December 11, 1941, Hitler indeed did that as a show of support for Japan. It was a move that every one of the German General Staff considered breathtakingly dangerous, stupid, and unnecessary.
Hitler was very much an admirer of the British Empire and saw Germany as basically ruling the world side by side with Britain.
Nope. Hitler wanted Britain to be the junior partner. Britain's choice after France fell was (a) be Hitler's bitch, or (b) be Roosevelt's bitch.
As evidenced by the fact that he ordered the Luftwaffe to essentially abandon its bombardment of Britain in the Spring of 1941 in order to have them prepare for Operation Barbaross (the invasion of the Soviet Union), war with Britain was not a priority for Hitler.
Nope. As evidenced by the fact that the majority of German war production in 1940-41 was devoted to air and sea power needed to fight Britain (and its American supporter, which Hitler expected to enter the war eventually), war with Britain was a top priority for Hitler.
Post a Comment
NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.