Wednesday, October 9, 2013

The abortion dichotomy

The English Crown Prosecution Service favors women's "right to choose" over the right of an unborn girl to not be killed because she is a girl:
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) was accused of failing to uphold the law after it ruled that it would not be in the “public interest” to prosecute the two doctors exposed in an undercover Daily Telegraph investigation.
Jeremy Hunt, the Health Secretary, on Wednesday night raised the case with the Attorney General. The two doctors were filmed agreeing to arrange terminations for women who requested them purely because they said they did not want to have a baby girl.  One of the doctors did so despite likening the practice to “female infanticide” while the other told a woman her job was not to “ask questions”.

The CPS acknowledged, following a 19-month inquiry, that there was sufficient evidence to warrant a prosecution with a “realistic prospect of conviction”. But it told police that a “public interest test” had not been met.
It's good to know which way female solipsism cuts. Apparently the thought that a woman might want an abortion trumps the thought that she might have been aborted. We're not in the realm of hypothetical situations here anymore; with the increased ability of scientists to select sex, we should expect to see the male/female ratio to increase in the West as it has already increased in the East.

16 comments:

Anonymous said...

Apparently the thought that a woman might want an abortion trumps the thought that she might have been aborted

We see the same special snowflake okay-for-me-but-how-dare-she thinking all the time.

The woman who has an affair with a married man and then gets mad at the next woman he has an affair with. Or the local 40 year old anchor lady outraged that they replaced her on the evening news with a woman in her twenties, completely ignoring that's exactly how she got her job 15 years ago.

It's obvious the average death-cult woman would make this choice, since it's too late for her own mother to retroactively abort her.

swiftfoxmark2 said...

Misandrists dominate our culture. This should come as no surprise.

But, as I have pointed out in the past, you can only abort one or two generations. After that, the only people left are people who will teach their kids to consider human as sacred.

Krul said...

with the increased ability of scientists to select sex, we should expect to see the male/female ratio to increase in the West as it has already increased in the East.

Damn. That's some bad news right there.

swiftfoxmark2 said...

Damn. That's some bad news right there.

Indeed. Polygamy is looking more and more viable for my son.

Trust said...

Basically, there are more votes to be won by telling women that their right to "reproductive health care" is at risk than by protecting unborn who will never have a name.

Funny how the left paints the right as gun wielding fanatics while the blood of the left (women of their own children imparticular, cuz nothing is greater than a mother's love) dwarfs the blood spilled by the right. But since the god of the left is the state, if it's legal it's ethical, and if it's "good" the state must do it.

Weouro said...

Indeed. Polygamy is looking more and more viable for my son.

You mean he and his brother will have a wife they share?

swiftfoxmark2 said...

You mean he and his brother will have a wife they share?

You misunderstand. The West will not go the route that China has gone. Instead, they will save the girls and let the boys be aborted. That's the impression I'm getting from this article.

It wouldn't surprise me that abortion will be outlawed when the gender is female, mostly because our entire system is operated by Gammas.

APL said...


Feminists 'promoting the right to choose' to kill females. Something of the snake eating it's tail own tail about it.

Greatheart said...

I wouldn't have a problem with them not being prosecuted, since there's no evidence they actually carried out the agreed abortions, but at the least they should be permanently banned from medical practice, and, if they are not natural-born citizens, deported.

LibertyPortraits said...

DARPA has to be salivating at the long-term prospect of a male-heavy world. I mean, who are they supposed to kill with all of their neat subsidized toys?

Crowhill said...

Girlwriteswhat has an interesting comment in one of her videos to the effect that the skewed ratio in favor of boys in China is at least partially caused by the obligation boys have to care for their parents in old age. IOW, if you can only have one kid, you have a choice between a boy -- who is obligated to care for you -- or a girl -- whom you are obligated to care for if she doesn't marry.

Anonymous said...

It makes perfect sense. What part of abortion for any reason don't you understand? The breadcrumbs that the feminists are unable to follow is what comes next: When government is paying for all your health care and abortions, Government gets to decide when you have them, as a cost saving measure, or to perform some other social engineering purpose for the greater good.

mickeypavic said...

"In that day seven women will take hold of one man and say, "We will eat our own food and provide our own clothes; only let us be called by your name. Take away our disgrace!"

Anonymous said...

If WRE, won't things be better in the future when there are fewer of them?

fitnes training said...

good games
cool car games

fitnes training said...

good games
cool car games

Post a Comment

NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.