According to a study from the University of Westminster, men who exhibit sexist attitudes towards women are also likely to have a preference for large breasts. The findings, which show a connection between sexism in men and breast size, involved 361 white men from 18-68 years of age being shown 3D models of women with a range of breast sizes. The men were then asked to identify which women they found most attractive, following which each was given a survey measuring hostility and attitudes toward women, relationships, benevolent sexism and how much a man objectified a women. The research found that the largest percentage of men (32.7 per cent) rated medium-sized breasts “most attractive”, followed by large (24.4 per cent) and then very large breasts (19.1 percent). The majority of men interested in large to very large breasts admitted to displaying behavioral traits of sexism and hostile attitudes towards women.Now, from an actual scientific perspective, both studies are complete junk. But let's pretend to take them seriously anyhow. By approaching this from the perspective of a metastudy, we can reasonably conclude that the majority of men who prefer larger breasts and wish to become fathers admit to displaying behavioral traits of sexism and hostile attitudes towards women. It's not so much that they make better dads as that they are the men who are interested in fathering children in the first place.
AND
According to Psychology Today, researchers Christopher Burris and Armand Munteanu conducted a study based on an “evolutionary perspective on breast size,” by asking 67 college men about their desire to become a father. Their answers were measured on a scale. Thereafter, the men were asked to adjust women’s’ breasts, hips and proportions on a computer-animated program according to their “ideal sexual partner.” The results revealed that men who wished to remain childless preferred smaller breasts, while men who preferred larger breasts had a desire to become a dad.
Which is good news for society, since well-endowed women who are not feminist will be more likely to give into their instinctive desire for dominant men and bear their children. Meanwhile, the flat-chested feminists will be refusing to involve themselves with those sexist chauvinists and can safely engage in mutually respectful childless relationships until such time their husband comes out of the closet or has an affair with a prepubescent student with even smaller breasts.
16 comments:
So in other words, sexist men make the breast dads!
So in other words, feminism is ant-evolution.
I love the not-so-subtle shaming in the article. Only poor, hungry working class schlubs like big tits! And men who prefer that ideal are encouraging women to get implants, which means they're more likely to commit suicide (you monster...)
You don't want to be one of those, do you?
Test if breast size increases over time, held constant for weight.
I guess I'm dad material, that's reassuring.
Once again, "science" confirms what real world experience has told us all our adult lives....news at 11.
I doubt there are any recently published studies, as it would be a horribly un-PC thing to even talk about and would no doubt ruin the careers of the researchers, but there is some annectodal evidence small breasts are indeed less effective at nursing babies.
The wife of a business associate is a nurse and "lactation consultant" at one of the local mega hospitals. We were talking at a soiree one night and she said her experience is that women with very small breasts, or breasts that are set wide on their chest (e.g. no cleavage) have the most trouble nursing. They're the most likely to not have the "hind milk" (the high-nutrient milk) come in.
Being more of an "ass" man, I'm wondering when we get to have a study examining that aspect of this situation, using our (or Britain's) tax dollars, of course.
Jack Amok said...
I doubt there are any recently published studies, as it would be a horribly un-PC thing to even talk about and would no doubt ruin the careers of the researchers, but there is some annectodal evidence small breasts are indeed less effective at nursing babies.
The wife of a business associate is a nurse and "lactation consultant" at one of the local mega hospitals. We were talking at a soiree one night and she said her experience is that women with very small breasts, or breasts that are set wide on their chest (e.g. no cleavage) have the most trouble nursing. They're the most likely to not have the "hind milk" (the high-nutrient milk) come in.
Small-breasted women tend to swell up most impressively during the nursing months, as long as they are healthy overall. As my own mother put it, during her first few months it was suddenly as if the eyes of every man she met would practically "pop out and dangle on stalks."
I would guess that those who don't experience this enlargement have some hormonal deficiency, whether due to diet/exercise or genetics.
The modern definition of a sexist is any man which isn't a white knight. So yeah, I'd say they are more equip to be good dads and probably aren't really sexists, just realists.
As you noted, the science is bunk, but the notion might not be. It's worth dancing naked around a bonfire with the right woman to do a field study, for my part. Uhrm, give or take.
Actually, I'm not into big boobs, or small, those are fine whatever the size. It's the hips, lad... As long as those are broad enough to shoulder rug rats and catch my attention. And, really, women no longer even turn me on just to copulate with, actually probably never did, save when the notion that... she might have my child from the act is in play. Oh, sex is fine, it's just not worth the effort without the possibility of a payout. Psychologically? Intellectually? I dunno, it's just the way it is for me.
probably aren't really sexists, just realists..
indeed. I imagine sexist men aren't inclined to sugar coat female character traits, making them less easily manipulated.
Sexist men. I've never met a man who believed in true equality. I don't think I've met a woman either.
Here's a good illustration of why the label sexist probably means the guy will be a better dad.
George W. Bush is considered a sexist. Bill Clinton is not considered a sexist.
Which of these two men would most people rather their daughter marry? Most people, even feminists who say they want to blow Clinton out of gratitude, would answer Bush if they are truly being honest.
Even Hillary wouldn't prefer Bill Clinton for her daughter.
P.S. both those men were piss poor presidents. The label of sexism is the point, not their rating as leaders.
Now, from an actual scientific perspective, both studies are complete junk. But let's pretend to take them seriously anyhow. By approaching this from the perspective of a metastudy, we can reasonably conclude that the majority of men who prefer larger breasts and wish to become fathers admit to displaying behavioral traits of sexism and hostile attitudes towards women. It's not so much that they make better dads as that they are the men who are interested in fathering children in the first place.
buy elo boost
lol elo booster
Post a Comment
NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.