Wednesday, February 20, 2013

More equal than others

The Prime Minister of the UK makes it clear the West is living in an equalitarian society in which female pigs are more equal than their male counterparts:
The Prime Minister also said that his wife, a director of a luxury goods company, often encourages him to promote women.  He said: “My wife likes to say that if you don't have women in 50 per cent of top positions, you are not missing out on 50 per cent of the talent, you are missing out on more than 50 per cent of the talent and I think she's right.”
Not all women are rabbits and more than a few men are, but this perfectly illustrates the rabbity thinking of most women.  Due to solipsism and the female imperative, they never stop ceasing to push for more of their own, until they crowd out everything else altogether.

This may sound controversial, but keep mind that women are STILL pushing for more women in higher education and claiming that there are not enough women in various academic disciplines even though women now already make up 58 percent of all university students in the United States.

38 comments:

Bob Wallace said...

Enough women in a field always destroys it, which includes not only education but single mothers raising children, especially boys, by themselves.

stg58/Animal Mother said...

Cameron looks homosexual to me, or at least very metrosexual. Does anyone else notice this?

Peter Garstig said...

"Please fuck me already"

herenvardo said...

[sigh] And he started out so well.

First he give the go-ahead for the fag 'marriage' circus, effectively destroying his party; now this.

Then again, given his notorious jumping through hoops for the benefit of the trendy press, he could be playing to the gallery.

Politicians - hack, gag, retch.

herenvardo said...

[sigh] And he started out so well.

First he give the go-ahead for the fag 'marriage' circus, effectively destroying his party; now this.

Then again, given his notorious jumping through hoops for the benefit of the trendy press, he could be playing to the gallery.

Politicians - hack, gag, retch.

whoism3 said...

I say capitulate..

and give them 100% of all the top spots. And just watch as everything crumbles and they come begging for you to take the reigns back.

Yeah, it might be painful short term, but it's the only way they will come to recognize that just because you can do a thing, does not follow that you necessarily *must* do a thing.

taterearl said...

Even if women had everything they always wanted...they still wouldn't be happy.

Eve had it all, and it still wasn't enough.

And men sacrificing their testicular fortitude isn't that path to womanly happiness.

Lulabelle said...

I like the math skills on display. Women are 50% of the talent. How was that stat contrived?

Will Best said...

I see that in the states at the local level when I talk about making the public schools equal in the sense of increasing activity and tactile experiences to aid the boys in learning and the pushback is always "won't that negatively effect girls".

I respond with, well ideally we would recognize the core differences between boys and girls and separate them until puberty so we could teach them in the manner that best serves their brain development. Which receives looks of horror because apparently its clearly my intention to teach little girls how to clean house and cook for 6 years.

Flip that on any other subject that is "manly" such as gun control. Of course the government can manage a balanced approach that doesn't unduly restrict freedom.

Trust said...

He doesn't believe what he said. He's just pandering for support. Anyone who challenges him will be accused of waging a war against women.

Fact is, it is much easy to manipulate female support through absurdities than male support.

An example is a 34 year old friend of mine. We talk politics and she is a solid conservative but votes a straight Democratic ticket every time. She explains that she wishes she could vote for an alternative but doesn't want the government telling her she can't take birth control, has to have children, or decriminalizing rape that they do not consider legitimate. This is an otherwise intelligent, accomplished woman who votes against her better judgment due to media ampliphied (or manufactured) political absurdities.

Forward (to our ruin)

Will Best said...

@ Trust

I have had some success getting such women into the Libertarian category. I netted Gary Johnson 12-15 votes that would have gone to Barrack Obama. I don't know how well it would have worked if I was in a competitive state instead of deep blue considering how potent the message from the feminist overlords can be.

jonw said...

IMO,this is another example of the men at the top spouting the feminine imperative to keep the middle to lower status men "in line"
I see this in churches all the time. The pastor or pastors constantly demean and insult the men to the delight and approval of most of the women.The man bashing at my church accompanied with the smug facial expressions of the women is becoming unbearable.

Trust said...

@Will

The libertarian shift of those votes is good.

I don't much advocate for the Romney's or McCain's of the ballot. But for someone whose positions are right wing across the board to vote for Obama she to nonsensical manufactured propaganda is hard to understand.

It would be like a poor single mother on welfare voting for a republican because over accusations that their income tax may go up under Obama. Talk about a bullet to the foot.

Scott said...


Ram z Paul on single women and politics
You might not be able to get them to vote for conservatives or libertarians but you can probably get them to not vote.

taterearl said...

"She explains that she wishes she could vote for an alternative but doesn't want the government telling her she can't take birth control, has to have children, or decriminalizing rape that they do not consider legitimate."

How dare anybody tells her fore-brain to be a mother! It's only the #1 biological imperative she has in her hind-brain.

Trust said...

@ taterearl

She actually buys into this nonsense that republicans want to make it mandatory. Personally, I wish socialists would not reproduce.

Anonymous said...

xbox720 is not aѕ smaгt as fіle contеnt.
lol

Feel free tο vіsit mу web pagе :: xk3ychip.se

Jehu said...

Jonw,
Find another church. Look for one with @50% men on a typical Sunday. Men go where they're wanted and stay where they're well treated. Take your tithes and other offerings with you. You're probably going to have to look for small, smaller than 150 or so churches. But the male-female ratio will tell you almost everything you need to know. Life is too short to put up with Churchian BS.

Joe Blow said...

Women have the right to chose... civilizational suicide.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2013/02/18/why-the-choice-to-be-childless-is-bad-for-america.html

Well done, ladies. What are you going to do for your next trick? Cause a collapse in space-time?

I've wondered what to tell my young son about how he should grow up. More and more I'm thinking, "learn to do a lot with your hands, buy guys and books and some land, hunker down" is the right advice. And marry a traditionalist woman if you can find one...

Will Best said...

The funny thing is that Western Civilization is now trying to save its social welfare by paying women to have kids. Propaganda campaign and mandates to follow. Of course these are mainly driven by the authoritarian elites on the left.

taterearl said...

"She actually buys into this nonsense that republicans want to make it mandatory. Personally, I wish socialists would not reproduce."


She must listen to what the media says and not see how cowering the Republican party is. They love to make a lot of noise and then can't wait to compromise.

taterearl said...

"Well done, ladies. What are you going to do for your next trick? Cause a collapse in space-time?"

This is why time travel should only be reserved for men. Once I figure out time travel...I'm going back to a time before the sexual revolution and live a more rewarding life.

Trust said...

Of course, the political shift around a marriage will give you whiplash. True, women may vote more conservative after a marriage since they want their husband's income to go to then directly rather than indirectly through the state. But even traditional women shift and enjoy the power the government provides them in marriage. They may pay lip service to it being unfair, but they'll never give it up.

ray said...

This may sound controversial, but keep mind that women are STILL pushing for more women in higher education and claiming that there are not enough women in various academic disciplines even though women now already make up 58 percent of all university students in the United States.


the UK is a tyrant/matriarchy just like US

women and their governments will continue to "advocate" until male enrollment is 5 percent . . . a few computer nerds, plus Criminal Justice majors (so, you know, the criminals ie males can be dealt with)

then the fem-media will be full of more articles telling us that males are lazy, shiftless, and useless, and should be punished for not having the motivation to "get an education"

pretty clever game they play eh?

same game is being played out in the workplaces --- women and the emasculates who serve them, like this PM, wont be happy until all males (except cops and prison guards) have been forced from employment

like this PM, to obtain any high political office in the west, one must already be a raving feminist, or a feminist-groveller . . . otherwise your "election" chances are zero

jonw said...

@Jehu
I hear you and I would,but I am the men's minister there. My men's ministry is different than most if not all other men's groups in churchianity.The typical church men's ministry is: read your bible,supplicate to your wife,and stop playing with your dick!
I have already made them aware of the pervasive message and expectation of male disposability,as well as red pill masculinity. I plan to increase the teaching of game concepts in the near future.
It has only been a few months and the men love it. More men are walking into church with their shoulders back,head up,and a smirk on their face. Praise the Lord!

Joe Blow said...

jonw - that's good to hear. Wish I'd heard that message as a teenager in church. People forget that Jesus whipped the money changers' butts and drove them out of the temple, he was a blue collar worker and fisherman and wasn't afraid to hang out with the scum of the earth, or with governors or kings. He was caring and forgiving, but a strong form of love personified. His example to us was as Alpha as it gets. We fall short when we do not imitate him.

Crispy said...

If women make $0.77 for every dollar men make (at least Dear Leader says it's so), then the eeeevil CEO's should hire as many women as they can!

Trust said...

I'm not surprised that for every dollar men make, women get 77 cents. What surprises me is that they let men keep 23 cents.

Jehu said...

JonW,
Ah if that's your gambit, be prepared for a rather apocalyptic fight. Don't expect the Churchians to fight fair either. But you probably don't need me to tell you this. I'll add you to my prayer list.

Vidad said...

whoism3 "I say capitulate..

and give them 100% of all the top spots. And just watch as everything crumbles and they come begging for you to take the reigns back."

You don't understand the female psyche. Or the perpetual martyr thought process. Has Africa asked for colonialism back, even though they've gone to hell in a handbasket since the Evil Whites left? Nope. They're punching themselves in the nuts repeatedly and screaming "it's colonialism's fault!!!"

We need to fight it. Hard. Right now, before it gets worse. The system is indeed unsustainable - the question is, will there be male leaders to brush aside the nonsense and lead in a way that brings other men back into leadership with them.

taterearl said...

Bill Burr once again said it best.

Men get paid more because in the event of SHTF we have to go down with the ship while the women get off first. It's a 23 cent surcharge.

Anonymous said...

I am a woman, and I am so sick of women wanting a certain "Number" in those top spots.
Why don't I want a "Number" in those top spots?
Because I want the spots to be filled based on merit, based on the right qualifications.
When I make that top spot, I want to know that it is because I deserved the spot.
Please, for the love of Pete, all you feminists out there, STOP!! You are ruining it for the women who are actually succeeding on our own merit!! PLEASE get out of our way!!

Anonymous said...

Oh, and let me add, that if that means, it turns out to only be a half-percent of the top spots, then so be it.
It should NOT be a number to hit.
Fill the roles with the most qualified candidates, regardless of their race, creed, or gender.

Trust said...

I think, truth be told, a woman would rather be sitting at Starbucks as the wife (or ex wife) of a high paid (or high alimony paying) CEO than to be the 60 a week CEO themselves.

When women simueltaneously demand more pay while only dating higher paying men, they are quite literally killing their own options.

Mr Green Man said...

Why doesn't dear David just have someone whip out the gelding shears during his next government speech to the House of Commons? Perhaps he could have his dear wife do it.

Barring that, why doesn't dear David just step aside now and encourage a woman to run for his safe constituency?

1 feminist went down with titanic, had a penis said...

"Bill Burr once again said it best.

Men get paid more because in the event of SHTF we have to go down with the ship while the women get off first. It's a 23 cent surcharge. "

he is funny, but not not ignorant.

Only when Dr. Farrell’s research journey uncovered these 25 differences, did the “holy grail” become visible: women now earn more money for the same work—that is, women earn more when they work equal hours at the same job with the same size of responsibility for the same length of time with equal productivity, etc. The women’s movement can celebrate its greatest single triumph—exceeding its goal of equal pay for equal work. A triumph that frees women to enter the next level of progress...

Foma Andreyevich said...

"I see this in churches all the time. The pastor or pastors constantly demean and insult the men to the delight and approval of most of the women.The man bashing at my church accompanied with the smug facial expressions of the women is becoming unbearable."

What sorts of things do they say? I hear about this all the time in the manosphere, but I've never come across it myself. I'm Eastern Orthodox, and we're very traditional in our ideas about gender roles and identity (and men are encouraged to actually be men) without being chauvinistic, though I suppose I can't speak for the way that some of the modern-day laity will act. The idea of man-bashing from the pulpit is an idea that's very foreign to me, and I'd be interested to know what your experiences of it are.

K_C said...

Foma, being Eastern Orthodox you are in one of the safest sects of Christianity. Read about this guy's experiences: http://thewomanandthedragon.wordpress.com/2012/12/16/if-you-challenge-femdom-churchianity-the-white-knights-will-attack-an-update-on-joseph-of-jackson/

Post a Comment

NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.