Agony of being a 50/50 mum: Women once held the upper hand in custody battles. Now fathers are winning EQUAL access... and mothers are struggling to cope.Feminism was always a lie. It's merely become more obvious to everyone as feminists get what they still say they want.
- Nicola Hewitt, 42, an office manager from Kenley, Surrey, faces the trauma of being without her children Devon, 10, and Sonny, eight, every weekend
- Veronica Sweeney-Bird, a 33-year-old bar worker from Tunbridge Wells, a week-on, week-off shared care arrangement for her two daughters
- Mothers are having to divide time with their children equally with their exes
Saturday, May 7, 2016
Women don't want equality
Some of them are going to whine no matter what. When fathers historical had full paternal rights over their children, that was oppressing women. When fathers disappear post-divorce, they are deadbeat dads. If everything is divided equally, we hear the shrieking about the "agony of being a 50/50 mother":
19 comments:
Want to see your kids all the time, ladies? Stop making bad choices.
A gamma I've been rehabilitating for some time said "What women want is such a mystery. When I give them what they ask for they mistreat me. I wish I knew what women really wanted so I could give it to them, but I don't think any man knows that."
The guy considers himself frail and weak in the face of women, and has a penchant for getting on the hooks of BPD-women... Yeah... But he's trying, and has made progress. But I digress.
The translated, abbreviated and therefore not-entirely-nuanced answer I gave was this:
"Women want _everything_, but they'll still be unhappy/angry/complaining/etc if/when _you_ try to give it to them because what you have been led to believe constitutes "everything" to a women, is wrong.
You've been told women want equality. They don't. Remember what I told you about women being fundamentally insecure. Hell, even [an ex of his that stepped on his heart and balls with stilettos] told you that and, for once she, didn't lie!
[Blah blah blah]
So what do they reeeally want? Women want to belong to and serve a strong and powerful man, with all which that entails."
And one more thing is needed: When the kids are with you ladies, YOU pay for everything.
When they're with DAd, he pays for everything. And no 'spousal' support. You;re a big girl, if you want to be on your own, you pay your own.
Isn't shared parenting and equal time with dad in the best interest of the children? Oh,I forgot, best interest of children is only a valid defense when it favors the mother. From the Alinsky playbook, cloak it in noble sounding cliches.
Since they're going to whine anyway, might as well give them a valid reason to whine.
- One hundred percent paternal custody of children. "Visitation" with the mother takes place at the father's discretion.
- No spousal support of any kind. You make your own way in the world (you are, after all, a "strong and empowered woman," so it shouldn't be difficult).
- All marital property acquired jointly during the marriage goes to the ex-husband (see my previous note about "strong, independent women," who, being "strong and independent," should have no trouble replacing what they've lost in no time at all. Besides, you don't want any MAN giving you anything. That's demeaning and sexist).
- Require women who break their marriage vows to compensate their ex-husbands for money spent on weddings, honeymoons, rings, etc., as part of a breach of contract settlement.
There, "ladies," NOW you have a reason to whine. But until such draconian measures become reality, you need to STFU and lie down in the hard, besoiled beds you've made for yourselves.
Women don't want equality
And children don't want to eat their vegetables, or go to bed on time, or take their medicine, or go to school, or ...
OT
I'm a hetersexual, "cis-scum" white male. I like to see naked women. Isn't it discriminatory and heterophobic to exclude me from women's changing/locker rooms?
OT
I'm a hetersexual, "cis-scum" white male. I like to see naked women. Isn't it discriminatory and heterophobic to exclude me from women's changing/locker rooms?
I would like to know, for each of these sob stories, which spouse filed for divorce. Isn't that a pretty relevant piece of information?
And I love how these sorts of articles always bounce between "we have to do what's good for the children", "we have to do what's good for women", "we have to do what's good for the children", "we have to do what's good for women"...
Never seen an article in the mainstream media that took the slant "we have to do what's good for men" unless it was in the context of "what's good for women is what's good for men". The same way, you know, we are told feminism is good for men.
I would like to know, for each of these sob stories, which spouse filed for divorce. Isn't that a pretty relevant piece of information?
Since women file 80 percent of divorces (that's 4 out of 5, 8 out of 10, 80 out of 100, 800 out of 1000, etc.), it's mathematically safe to ALWAYS assume that the wife filed unless it's clearly stated otherwise.
By the way, I'm willing to wager that of the remaining 20 percent of cases in which the husband filed that in at least half of those cases that the husband filed in response to the wife's behavior (adultery, abuse, marital abandonment, etc.). This would mean that 90 percent of divorces are effectively the result of women's actions, leading to even more certainty that in any given case it's driven by the wife.
Women don't want safe, either.
Women looking for flings choose smokers
At this point of my life, I'm beyond any kind of concern for "what women want".
@Bob Loblaw said... I would like to know, for each of these sob stories, which spouse filed for divorce. Isn't that a pretty relevant piece of information?
_________
For those of us interested in truth, yes. For the media, they are more intersted in an agenda than truth.
On that same media ommission/commission note, here are a couple snippets from The Associated Press along the same lines:
"Dozens of families took legal action Wednesday in a bid to stop a suburban Chicago school district from allowing a transgender student to use a girls' locker room and restroom, arguing the policy trampled on the privacy rights of other students. Lawyers for Alliance Defending Freedom and Thomas More Society, two conservative groups, filed the 77-page suit Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Chicago on behalf of 51 families with links to Palatine-based Township High School District 211.
"The American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois, which has represented the transgender student, criticized the suit. 'Today's lawsuit is a sad development by groups opposed to fair and humane treatment of all students, including those who are transgender,' said Edwin Yohnka, an ACLU spokesman. 'We expect that today's lawsuit will meet the same unsuccessful end as the previous efforts to peddle fear and divisiveness.'"
http://www.sj-r.com/article/20160504/NEWS/160509797
Notice "Alliance Defending Freedom" is identfied as a conservative groups, not just by the name that state's they defend freedom. OTOH, the Americal Civil Liberties Union is never labeled by the AP as liberal, progressive, or left wing group, their name stating their (supposed) purpose is enough. It's the Alinsky rule of cloaking your own position in noble covers (liberties), while labeling or ridiculing your opponents (hence the conservative or right wing lables).
Rest assured, in cases where the father left, they would make sure we knew it. Mothers who blow up their families are just mothers struggling to get by and/or longing for their children. A father who did so would be labeled.
Every student should sue for full privacy bathrooms. Refuse to use any bathroom that allows trans genders to use single sex bathrooms.
What happens if a "Trans-Female" is also a lesbian? What bathroom then, does she use? Does she then use the Cis-Men's room so that she is not sexually harassed by the other women in the cis-female's room? Is anyone having headaches trying to get their mind around this stuff?
Outlaw child support. If the mother cannot produce evidence she can support the child, he should go to his father.
Fuck these stupid bitches.
I'm a 70/30 dad. Yup, I won, mostly, my custody battle. My advice to men is to never give up the fight for your kids.
I would also start keeping a secret, growing nest egg. So many men let their bitches control family finances. If you make the money, you take control.
@ Unknown: Gold coins, rather than the banks. Not too hard to hide in a home.
There is a wise Argentine proverb about this. "Stick it in; she screams. Pull it out; she weeps."
Post a Comment
NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.