Wednesday, January 27, 2016

Why don't they just hold her down?

Defending yourself against orc-rape is illegal in Denmark:
Police in Denmark have sparked anger by warning a teenage girl that she faces prosecution for using pepper spray to fend off an attacker near an asylum seekers centre.

The 17-year-old, from the coastal town of Sonderborg, was forced to the ground by an English-speaking man who tried to undress her. She was later warned by police that the pepper spray she used on him was illegal for private citizens to possess, and that she would face a £50 fine.
It's almost as if they're daring the population to rise up against the invaders.

28 comments:

Leahn Novash said...

Seriously, when the pendulum swings back, it is gonna be a mess. It is gonna be personal.

Miguel D'Anconia said...

Time to go orc hunting.....

Verne said...

We will leave you defenseless, then not defend you. It sounds like our social contract with government, that law enforcement is based on is being broken. Lynch mobs tend to be the result of that.

One Fat Oz Guy said...

Dumb question, but what are the police there for if not to serve and protect? I mean, technically their serving the PC agenda, but they've still got to protect, don't they?

Anonymous said...

but they've still got to protect, don't they?


US law ( and i assume most other western law ) has ruled numerous times that the police are under no obligation to protect any particular citizen in any particular situation.

all the officer need do is to claim that he was "concerned for his own personal safety". a lot of unarmed US citizens get shot by cops this way.

it's rather notorious that British citizens are not permitted ( under current practice of law ) to defend themselves with guns WITHIN their own homes against multiple armed attackers.



It's almost as if they're daring the population to rise up against the invaders.


against the invaders? hell, how bout against the government?

Leahn Novash said...

The government is one step divided from the situation. People still have some trust in the 'impersonal' government, even when they don't have any trust left in specific individuals like Merkel.

They still believe that the government is on their side, because they believe only specific individuals are against them, not the whole government. Hence they believe the government will be there to help them against the invaders, if they rise up.

But once the population understands that to not to be the case anymore, then yes, you are right.

Anonymous said...

It's a novel Marxist tax plan; instead of paying taxes to the state so that police protect you, you pay damages to the state for defending yourself against the state's workers.

The migrants are state employees. It pays for their food and shelter among other welfare. The criminal actions of anybody on benefits are the actions of state employees. The state is responsible.

Denmark gave that invader his check, his door into europe, and his arrogance with full awareness of what he would do. As far as I'm concerned he is a state agent.

Anonymous said...

There was a famous case in South Korea several decades ago in which a would-be rape victim bit off her attacker's tounge. The attempted rape itself was not contested by any party; non-consent was established. The victim was tried on charges of "excessive self-defense."

The case had attracted international attention and her lawyer was a feminist who took heat from other feminists because her successful defense was based on the rape victim/defendant being a reputable married woman.

PA

Dexter said...

"an English-speaking man" -- so some high-class Jeremy Irons type guy, not a greasy, smelly Arab?

swiftfoxmark2 said...

Just like in Catch-22 where Yossarian was arrested by MP for desertion while the maid who Aarfy just raped and murdered lies in the background.

When did dark comedy become reality?

Terrific said...

Slightly off topic, but up to the minute. Here's the latest from the cuckservative media about what Donald Trump should do about the debate. Seriously, I JUST heard this from the Neocon Betaboy himself, Michael Medved.

He said Trump should go to the debate and instead of walking directly to his lectern, he should {show his alphaness-my words-by}, BREAKING PROTOCOL and walk over to Megyn Kelly and. . . I'M NOT MAKING THIS UP. . .

GIVE HER FLOWERS!!!!!

OMG!!! He REALLY said that!

NEVER have I heard such a painful display of betatude in my life! And I speak as a recovering beta.

What is the No. 1 Rule when dealing with a SJW?

NEVER APOLOGIZE. NEVER, EVER, EVER APOLOGIZE.

And do I need to point out that he thought it was a really, really good idea? A "wonderful" suggestion to Mr. Trump?

And they wonder why we say they're cuckolded.

Anonymous said...

Yes, the social contract is broken. Some thoughts occur:

1. We didn't break it.
2. You ALWAYS have the right to defend yourself, social contract notwithstanding.
3. When people realise the contract has been broken, they WILL defend themselves by any means available and necessary.
4. As has been said, the consequences are going to be ugly.

Given all the above is obvious even to the traitors in our political class, there is a very high probability this is exactly the expected result of their policies of treason. since they're not suicidal, they think they will survive the coming confrontation.

What makes them so confident? Is it ignorance of history, or do they really believe this time really is different?

bw said...

It's almost as if they're daring the population to rise up against the invaders.
Ding Ding Ding! We just don't know if it's because they want to crush the nationalists once and for all -- or crush Islam once and for all (or at least for long time). That is the $$quadzillion question. Taken in conjunction with Trump, it at least allows us to think about .. maybe .. raising an eyebrow again.

Joe A. said...

Why the flying fuck is pepper spray illegal? Good Lord Almighty.

liberranter said...

So it's not just in the U.S. that cops are not only useless, dickless pussies when it comes to fighting REAL crime, but are abusive bullies to the victims as well?

Gosh, who knew...? /sarc

Anonymous said...

Rome rebelled against their Etruscan kings over a rape. Or so the story goes.

liberranter said...

OFOG asked:

Dumb question, but what are the police there for if not to serve and protect?

They ARE protecting and serving - the ruling classes from the rabble, which includes the young white girl nearly raped by the barbarian segment of the rabble.

Come on now, after all the examples out there to the contrary, you don't seriously think cops give a shit about the lives, safety, and property of the proletariat, do you?

1337kestrel said...

No, no, the rapist was described as "English-speaking." He's obviously a European, probably one of those British "internalised rapists." The media's not trying to disguise his true race or nationality with a deceptive use of terminology.

Dexter said...

Why the flying fuck is pepper spray illegal?

A criminal might be harmed! Or suffer feelbad! And vigilantes encouraged! The only proper use of force is through the agents of the state!

Dexter said...

Also, what if the rapist takes your pepper spray away and uses it against you? Ever think about that? Bet you didn't, you right-wing nutjob!

Derrick Bonsell said...

Who's going to rise up? Who are folks willing to be the martyrs required to kick things off?

Harambe said...

Who's going to rise up? Who are folks willing to be the martyrs required to kick things off?

Why don't you show us how it's done.

Bob Loblaw said...

Why the flying fuck is pepper spray illegal?

I don't know what the excuse is in Sweden, but what I heard in the US in places where it's illegal is muggers and rapists use it to get a jump on their victims. Don't know if there's any truth to it.

John Rockwell said...

Defending yourself against criminals is illegal in Europe.

Muscle Gain said...

impasse through this reliably again on sharing two pearls so on my last train I need to get more beats to my Centument LTD right sir to get for CVD the Pearl for CV and after that my faint lack of respect nitrates attach going to get for CV the pearl crosses for situation we have both the far side walls entire back divider not hesitating to move my needle so Icon .


http://x4facts.com/centument-ltd/

finndistan said...

sigsawyer

Your comment opened a window for me. Yes, I knew they were housed, fed and paid by the government, I knew they were a tool in the destruction of the west, but looking at them as government operatives makes the most sense of all.

That underlying, deeply hidden idea explains the inactivity of the Cologne police during the rapes while water gunning Pegida and all other things.

Ahazuerus

You always have the right to protect yourself, any means possible.

I am of two ideas here,
1. The police genuinely wanted to punish this girl for excessive use of force against her rapist.
2. the police has give the message out, passing through all PC filters, that it is ok to pepper spray a savage, and no charges will be laid except a pepper spray usage task. Now when one extrapolates that into further means of defense, I can't help but wonder if that is actually the idea behind the police making a case that would go viral.


Aeoli Pera said...

I don't know what the excuse is in Sweden, but what I heard in the US in places where it's illegal is muggers and rapists use it to get a jump on their victims. Don't know if there's any truth to it.

Nope, that's total bullshit. Rapists tend to be minorities, who don't carry nonlethal weapons, and they know slugging her once or twice and/or choking will do the trick.

Aeoli Pera said...

In most cases of rape though, she's already quite intoxicated and incapable of determined resistance, escaping, and seeking help.

Post a Comment

NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.