Monday, June 22, 2015

The cost of coalburning

I am not even remotely surprised to hear what is reported to have triggered the Charleston shooter:
Dylann Roof's cousin claims the suspected killer became racist after a girl he liked started dating a black man. According to Scott Roof, his cousin, these feeling were vitalized when Dylann's love interest became involved with a black man.

'He kind of went over the edge when a girl he liked starting dating a black guy two years back,' Scott told The Intercept, adding that he also 'started listening to that white power music stuff.'

'Dylann liked her. The black guy got her,' Scott said. 'He changed. I don’t know if we would be here if not...' he finished, before hanging up the phone on the reporter.
From the dawn of time, men have attempted to protect their tribe's women from mating with outsiders. And women have socially ostracized men who pursued women outside the community. Black women hate it when black men date white women. Asian men hate it when Asian women date white men. And obviously, many white men are less than entirely enthusiastic about white women engaging in what they describe as "mudsharking" and "coalburning". I tend to doubt my Native American ancestors were particularly pleased when my grandmother quite literally married "off the reservation".

I'm not surprised that there has been such a vicious and violent reaction to the constant barrage of "ebony and ivory" in the media. The more the media pushes, and the more white girls respond to the propaganda by choosing black men over white men, the more extreme the reaction is likely to be. There is no inevitable "progress". Sooner or later, the pendulum always swings back.

The New York Times asked "who radicalized Dylann Roof?":
Who radicalized Roof? Who passed along the poison? We must never be lulled into a false belief that racism is dying off with older people. As I’ve written in this space before, Spencer Piston, an assistant professor of political science at Syracuse University, has found that “younger (under-30) whites are just as likely as older ones to view whites as more intelligent and harder-working than African-Americans.”
The pro-diversity crowd radicalized Dylann Roof. Sexual competition is pretty close to a zero-sum game, so every time a white girl decides to have sex with a black man, the seeds for another spurned Dylann Roof are planted. And those potentially violent seeds are watered every time BM-WF couples are advertised on television shows, on advertisements, and in the movies. Few of them will sprout, since the average man will simply write the girl off and find someone else, but the more that are planted, the more rage-filled killer omegas there will be.

29 comments:

HickoryHammer said...

Hahaha, laughed out loud at the post title! Seriously though, omega butthurt rage has always been a part of humanity. The modern firearm has made it more consequence filled, In the past I think these guys still went the confrontation route and ended up getting curb stomped (or would it be mud hut stomped?)

HickoryHammer said...

Maybe this is why the media is so obsessed with the black girl white guy narrative these days? Give dem omegas their consolation prize.

Harambe said...

Wow, that article is pretty objective /sarc

c0pperheaded said...

I was talking to my SJW niece about Dylann Roof. She was convinced that it was entirely motivated by race. I explained to her that that is like saying that the North invaded the South because of slavery. Did it play a role? Yes, but it was much more complicated than that.

Trust said...

They'll probably accuse the manosphere of loading the gun, when I would wager students of game are probably less violent due to a more realistic view of women. Losers like Roof have a larger gap between what they've been taught and reality.

Anonymous said...

Is he actually an Omega or Gamma?

I always understood Omegas to be at the "resignation" stage of losing out. Gammas are in anger, denial, and bargaining all at once.

Deltas live in a state of permanent shock...

Mr.MantraMan said...

The right wing fringes do not radicalize anyone, they merely collect up those who are radicalized by the Left. The Left creates these "white racists" go read the manifesto yourselves.

Daniel said...

Omega: The truly unfortunate. Omegas are the social losers who were never in the game. Sometimes creepy, sometimes damaged, often clueless, and always undesirable. They're not at the party. It would never have crossed anyone's mind to invite them in the first place. Omegas are either totally indifferent to women or hate them with a borderline homicidal fury.

Gamma mass shooters are about as likely as female mass shooters. Their brains are designed more for fear and depression than for planned violent attacks. When Gammas go violent, it is either out of a sense of self-preservation or suicide.

Anonymous said...

@09d7b214

I remember seeing a pic of the girl in question making out with Dylann, so it's possible they did have a fling but she lost interest in him. Unfortunately, I can't remember where I saw it, but I'm sure somebody can find it.

But that, plus Dylann's statement about "rap[ing] our women", suggests to me that he's a Gamma, not an Omega.

Examples of Omega would be the Korean shooters, Cho Seung-hui and One Goh. In neither case were they crazy, just hardcore Omega. White mass shooters tend to be complete mental cases, like James Holmes and Jared Lee Loughner. Not quite sure about Adam Lanza, he was probably either an Omega or also crazy.

Laguna Beach Fogey said...

Events such as the Charleston shooting are entirely the product of the toxic anti-White environment created by the Left and its pet Orcs.

Anonymous said...

@Daniel

Remember that Dylann was on a drug that can cause violent behavior. It's entirely possible, and I think probable, that if he hadn't been on it, he would have simply been your typical angry, depressed, but more or less harmless Gamma.

hank.jim said...

Luckily, there are so many more Asian women. And there are plenty of Black women too, which I suppose why they are single.

Anonymous said...

Half the articles on RoK are about going out and pilfering another tribe's women, because greener grass or something.

Anonymous said...

It is strange that I don't hear more people making the connection that a woman who "mudsharks" is no longer wanted by white men. The closest I have seen is here with regard to race-neutral carousel riding.

Mr.MantraMan said...

Always ask "why is this information being produced?" And BM-WF is propaganda deluxe, its also for the effort expended a freaking fail.

Now imagine that instead of lengthy essays about it we just come out and deride it as a joke and an evil joke at that, hell not even the prominent SJW coal burn, and I could care less if they do it.

Anonymous said...

It is strange that I don't hear more people making the connection that a woman who "mudsharks" is no longer wanted by white men.

Because its not something you are allowed to say in a public setting anymore. Just like they are trying to do with homosexuality. Prevent the speech, control the thought.

And BM-WF is propaganda deluxe

It is a proxy. If you can accept a woman who has done it, then you can accept a lot of other things about her too.

Mastermind said...

"Half the articles on RoK are about going out and pilfering another tribe's women, because greener grass or something."

A lot of game literature is produced by mystery meat omegas who fantasize about white women they can't have.

Dark Herald said...

Honestly I had wondered about that possibility when I heard about the, "you rape our women," bit.

But then I dismissed the possibility almost instantly. Naw, it couldn't be that simple, Cataline thought to himself.

Cataline has been wrong about a lot of things in his life. Usually on the second guess.



MichaelJMaier said...

"It is strange that I don't hear more people making the connection that a woman who "mudsharks" is no longer wanted by white men."

I wouldn't date a white or Asian girl that dated blacks. If she were half-black, okay. That's sensible. But after having done that once, I cannot say I'm eager to try it again. Blacks are so innately and reflexively tribalistic that it's really damn annoying.

Maybe they cannot help it, being such an obviously distinctive minority. But it doesn't change how all of them are.

MichaelJMaier said...

And I found this funny, considering the page it's on and that it has a direct link on this page right now:

http://www.returnofkings.com/66289/how-to-raise-a-red-pill-revolutionary

Roger the Shrubber said...

Vox; would you be the least bit surprised if Roof is one day regarded as a national hero, much like George Washington and William Tell?

MichaelJMaier said...

Wow... that might be the dumbest comment ever made in this blog's history.

And that's including the Amazing Rancid Vagina's, too.

Anonymous said...

Maybe they cannot help it, being such an obviously distinctive minority. But it doesn't change how all of them are.

There's an innate reason for that.

Based on genetic distances, the human race could be divided into three subspecies: sub-Saharan Africans, Australian Aborigines, and everyone else.

MichaelJMaier said...

So their racism against others is justified? Cool, that makes all racism against them justified too, on the same basis.

Laramie Hirsch said...

Bella and the Bulldags strikes again

Dark Herald said...

Vox; would you be the least bit surprised if Roof is one day regarded as a national hero, much like George Washington and William Tell?

God no. He's an Omega, who acted like an Omega.

A pity he didn't follow his natural career path and start slinging glass for a living, he'd be dead or in prison by now.

Anonymous said...

confirmation of related arguments:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3126987/Huge-numbers-Muslims-turning-ISIS-want-SEX-reveals-former-Islamist-says-resent-freedoms-Western-youths-have.html

Bobo #117 said...

Funny the timing of it all...

Unknown said...

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-wLgoI2Hw9fA/VY2m9WQrWhI/AAAAAAAAAUc/OZZcj2ccgFg/s1600/comic30.jpg

Relevant.

Post a Comment

NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.