Monday, October 13, 2014

The problem of insufficient vaginas

I've found that one easy way to stop a feminist running the usual "moahr wimmins" line in her tracks is to ask her to explain, specifically, how more vaginas will improve whatever situation she is complaining about.

"So, precisely how will having more vaginas in the immediate vicinity improve our sales?

"Do vaginas make people smarter and more productive by mere physical proximity or is it some sort of aromatherapeutic performance enhancer?"

"Will we generate higher investment returns in proportion to the additional number of vaginas involved?"

It's rather amusing to see how they can't even begin to make a case for it. The exception, of course, being a society with insufficient native vaginas giving birth to children. In that case, it is a real and serious problem to which "moahr wimmins" being encouraged and incentivized to do so is a legitimate solution.

33 comments:

Stg58/Animal Mother said...

Just ask why until complete mental breakdown occurs.

Anonymous said...

lol...

Anonymous said...

Congress keeps getting more and more diverse, and yet it gets more and more dysfunctional.

tz said...

Detroit has many "native vaginas giving birth to children". 80% out of wedlock.
It is a problem that Fatherhood requires cooperation.

Anonymous said...

Sarah Silverman has donned a strap-on and is plugging the wage gap in response to the "vagina tax".

hank.jim said...

I'm not sure the argument is about improving the situation, but diversity!!!

Anyways, the argument about female involvement is BETTER communication and better collaboration from the female approach. Anyone who has worked with females should know that this is bunk, but this is what they claim.

LAZ said...

"So, precisely how will having more vaginas in the immediate vicinity improve our sales?"

That one's easy. To sell stuff you must first sell yourself- and sex sells.

Laguna Beach Fogey said...

Anyone who has worked with females should know that this is bunk

Precisely. Observe any gathering of more than 4 or 5 females and watch how they talk over one another, their voices quickly reaching a crescendo as they all attempt to control the conversation and make their voice heard.

John Williams said...

@Laguna, "Independent monologues" is what a friend of mine called them. Once you notice the phenomenon, it's funny how often you'll see gaggles of women just blathering on, ignoring all the others. I've wondered if this is what passes for friendship in the world of women. I've also wondered how parallel this is to twitter and how unmanly tweeting is.

Unknown said...

"The exception, of course, being a society with insufficient native vaginas giving birth to children."

It seems that nature takes care of that problem itself. Most populations have slightly more females than males, and a healthy population always breeds slightly more girls than boys (except when it is externally controlled, like in China)

Stg58/Animal Mother said...

A great ratio of females to males in an office is one, as in one female. Ours gives us no trouble at all, and we can also achieve new levels of Feelbad by having a token female.

Anonymous said...

Precisely. Observe any gathering of more than 4 or 5 females and watch how they talk over one another, their voices quickly reaching a crescendo as they all attempt to control the conversation and make their voice heard.

No man likes a sausagefest, but being the lone male in a group of clucking hens is also usually extremely annoying.

Most populations have slightly more females than males, and a healthy population always breeds slightly more girls than boys

No, it's about 105 boys per 100 girls born. The only reason that there are often more women than men in a population is because men are more likely to get killed prematurely, which whittles them out of the population, leaving a bunch of elderly women who take forever to kick off.

Joseph Dooley said...

I work at a Fortune 500 company, and Wednesdays are "Support women in IT" days. I asked the women who explained it to me how more women helps IT, and she gave me that deer in the headlights look.

If you support IT, you shouldn't support "support women in IT."

Stg58/Animal Mother said...

That's funny. You exceeded the limits of their programming.

RCR_Chris said...

Is it an aroma-therapy based performance enhancer....

lol.

That's awesome

Matamoros said...

KAZ: To sell stuff you must first sell yourself- and sex sells.

What? Sell vaginas along with your product? ))))

Akulkis said...

Once you notice the phenomenon, it's funny how often you'll see gaggles of women just blathering on, ignoring all the others. I've wondered if this is what passes for friendship in the world of women. I've also wondered how parallel this is to twitter and how unmanly tweeting is.

It's obvious that someone made a typo and too much time/effort/money/D////nS registration had already been invested in the typo on what started out as an idea called Twatter.

insanitybytes22 said...

"Do vaginas make people smarter and more productive by mere physical proximity or is it some sort of aromatherapeutic performance enhancer?"

They've made men smarter and more productive for thousands of years, a truth so many of you are terrified to face.

hank.jim said...

A well-endowed woman will definitely relieve stress and make men more productive. Or maybe the opposite.

RCR_Chris said...

"They've made men smarter and more productive for thousands of years, a truth so many of you are terrified to face."


True, but that was always by providing incentive for men to outcompete one another for access.....

The current legal framework where everything is "sexual harassment" now actually dis-incentivizes such competition anymore, which brings us back to the question - Exactly what benefit is gained with the addition of more vaginas?

Anonymous said...

They've made men smarter and more productive for thousands of years, a truth so many of you are terrified to face.

Only if we're regularly fucking them. Like in a traditional marriage. If we're just forced to have them around and not allowed to touch, as in the modern workplace, it has the opposite effect.

Also, the mouth attached to the vagina causes its own problems in the workplace.

Stg58/Animal Mother said...

Insanityrearsitsuglyhead22 has returned! Now with more wisdom!

Matamoros said...

Women: The Time Bombs We Love

I believe that somewhere deep in every woman's subconscious there is a microchip that employs Outcome Based Logic to justify any type of bad behavior when it is exposed. In sweet Cylvia's own words: "My decision to marry illegally felt very, very distant and far removed from the life I was building. I was ashamed and embarrassed. Therefore I did not share this information even with John once we met and started dating." And there it is. - See more at: http://henrymakow.com/#sthash.kCUGXDgN.dpuf

subject by design said...

If Cylvia FELT like it happened in a different life, then it did.

Stg58/Animal Mother said...

She wasn't the same person! Don't you brutes understand?

subject by design said...

Also that property she bought in Washington with her "abusive" boyfriend so he could start a marijuana plantation.... totally a different life.

1sexistpig2another said...

I believe that somewhere deep in every woman's subconscious there is a microchip that employs Outcome Based Logic to justify any type of bad behavior when it is exposed.

It's called the rationalization hamster and she doesn't even have to get caught for it to kick in. In fact, I suspect it is always running. Only what it employs is not any form of logic, but rather emotion based fiction. See posts by insanitybytes for examples.

APL said...

insanitybytes22: " They've made men smarter and more productive for thousands of years, a truth so many of you are terrified to face."

The uncomfortable truth that feminists prefer not to face, is that competition among men for female attention tends to make men smarter, but there doesn't seem to be much incentive for women to get smarter.

Bobby Dupea said...

Let's not forget virtual vaginas. They truly make the world better. I'm close to ignoring the NFL until Nov 1, owing to virtual vagina fluorescent pink overload.

Matamoros said...

owing to virtual vagina fluorescent pink overload.

Tittyball, not football. Of course there hasn't been real football since the '60s what with the affirmative action hires. Thugball, yes; football, no.

Anonymous said...

I work for a company whose ratio is over 3 females per male in the communication industry in one of the most femocentric countries in the world. You should see how long it takes to make a decision and how tiresome our telephone conferences can be.

Of course in a country know for its equalism, progressivism and the like i never heard someone complaining that more men would be needed sin our company making at least the "equalist 50/50"

Brad Andrews said...

http://www.networkworld.com/article/2824365/careers/women-in-it-no-longer-a-nice-to-have.html

Dexter said...

one easy way to stop a feminist running the usual "moahr wimmins" line in her tracks is to ask her to explain, specifically, how more vaginas will improve whatever situation she is complaining about.

It is the same problem as asking how more diversity or more gays will solve any problem. It does because... well, it just does, so shut up, racist sexist homophobic dipshit.

Do vaginas make people smarter and more productive by mere physical proximity

Most of the time it seems to make the men in proximity to the vagina much more stupid and distracted.

They've made men smarter and more productive for thousands of years, a truth so many of you are terrified to face.

It is not the proximity of the vagina that does that. It is access to the vagina on the man's terms. He wants to be smart and productive enough to keep the vagina at home where only he can use it. He does not want the vagina around him at work.

Post a Comment

NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.