Patrick Fowler, 31, has been charged with two counts of first-degree intentional homicide in the deaths of Jessica Ellenberger, 28, and her four-year-old daughter Madyson Marshel.The important thing, and I'm sure we can all agree on this, is that although Ellenberger and her daughter are both dead, at least no one can call her racist. No doubt her grieving parents will take great comfort from this.
Fowler told police he and Ellenberger got into an argument and that he 'felt as if he were being disrespected', according to the complaint.
When Ellenberger told him to 'back off' Fowler allegedly began to stab her, telling police he was unsure of how many times but that he 'kept on and kept on'.
Fowler then realized his girlfriend was still alive and grabbed more knives, continuing to stab her before he slit her throat. As Madyson, a recent cancer survivor, screamed out 'Mommy!', Fowler then began to stab the little girl too.
At this point, is anyone surprised? Manjaw, check. Illegitimate brown baby, check. And so the descent into barbarism continues unchecked, for fear of observing the obvious.
32 comments:
No doubt dating a string of dangerous men was thrilling for her...but she probably figured that, as a 'protection officer', her go-grrrl kickassedness would see her through any danger. This story is a culmination and morality tale about *multiple* modern narratives.
father of her daughter is also black.
her attacker had his WEDDING called off *6 months* earlier because he threatened his fiancee ... and he was out on probation for that earlier threat.
Burn the coal, pay the toll.
That's one idiot who won't be able to pass on her stupidity.
I'm afraid I miss the significance of her "ManJaw". In what way is that a tell?
". . .for fear of observing the obvious." Great line. I'm stealing it.
Tom, physiognomy is real. Check this out:
https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2016/03/26/guess-the-supporters-presidential-candidate/
Jessica Ellenberger (mother)
Christopher Clark (father)
Madyson Marshel (offspring)
A third last name, huh?
Curiously, we physiognomist types have determined that even the most socially retarded (autistic) people can still read testosterone very well, likely because it represents a potential existential threat. In a lineup of averaged facial morphs, everybody can pick out the MMA fighter morph (2nd place is the opposite on the testosterone spectrum, the male feminist morph).
The manjaw suggests heavy testosteronization in puberty. The real question at this point is WHY. Wherefore all these steely-eyed, manjawed cunts? What has changed so dramatically about female puberty?
Whenever I watch one of those ID Discovery crime shows right in the beginning before they show a black person I am screaming at the TV "the N!gger did it the
n!gger did it! I'm right about 90% of the time. The only time I'm not right is when there are no black characters in the show at all.
Most of these "mudsharking" articles seem to be about women dating violent, criminal black men. It implies every black man presents a real danger when that's not true. Why not just say "don't date black men because (insert substantive cultural differences here)" or "you're going to want your children to look like you."
"It implies every black man presents a real danger when that's not true."
I'm sure that's comforting to the families of these ""mudsharking" articles seem to be about women dating violent, criminal black men".
At this point, I'm not sure whether this is a good or bad thing. Sure she was murdered, but living with an alien sprog with no possible bright outcome and an angry anthropoid lover coming in and out of her social circle to beat and rape her, maybe death is the best case scenario here?
Miscegenation never turns out well. These progressive retards with their xenophilia, love for exotic and unfamiliar experiences and naive try anything once foolhardiness always tell people that the new is better than the old. In some cases this is true. However, like they say, if it ain't broke don't fix it. Races exist for a reason. The Holy Bible says that races were created as a curse for the folly of a mad King whose crazy megalomania drove him to enslave the entire population to build a Tower to Heaven the Legendary Tower of babel is why man is divided permanently by race.
Whether you believe that or not, the staggering cases like the Liger a Lion/Tiger hybrid that only forms in captivity, and which always end up hopelessly uncontrollable aand insane, should I believe be a serious cautionary tale to prevent this mad rush for miscegenation that the usual suspects, no friends of ours, want so badly for us.
@Salt
Aaaaaaand that doesn't answer my question. Clearly the man was violent and no woman with any sense would be anywhere near him. These articles imply that this is the natural and expected consequence of dating a black man and not the natural and expected consequence of dating a violent criminal. Even if black men are statistically more likely to commit violent crime than white men (and white men more than Asian men), this doesn't mean every black man is inherently dangerous or that every interracial relationship will naturally end in violence. However, a strong argument could definitely be made for not dating men from cultures where real rape culture actually exists, which would include many sub-Saharan African countries.
I guess it's true that once you go black, you never go back.
Clearly the man was violent and no woman with any sense would be anywhere near him.
Huggums, this is the problem in your argument that you might not realize.
The ghost of Larry Auster says "eh what else is new?"
Didn't you read? She "disrespected" him. He was entitled. What are you - some kinda racist?
Most of these "mudsharking" articles seem to be about women dating violent, criminal black men. It implies every black man presents a real danger when that's not true. Why not just say "don't date black men because (insert substantive cultural differences here)" or "you're going to want your children to look like you."
Because it is rhetoric, not dialectic. If the women at risk were capable of grasping mathematical probabilities, it is unlikely they would have put themselves in such situations in the first place.
Women have sense?
Oh wait, sorry...
"Womens gots senses?"
Vox, never forget:
"Math class is tough!"
@VD
Thanks, VD. I figured that might be the case. I still don't know who this is intended to reach however. I've met women who go for these type of men and they are Darwin award material. The danger of dating a known violent criminal is no doubt very appealing to them. I'm not white so I wouldn't know the best approach, but I would think a "once you go black, we (white men) will never take you back" approach. Remove that subconscious safety net. Either way makes no difference to me. I like chocolate skin and steatopygia too much.
@Stg58
I don't understand what you mean. Plenty of sensible white women might date black men. They're just smart enough to pick ones without violent crime convictions. The other ones are just dumb.
Besides cultural differences, where can be found a good argument or case for defending anti-miscegenation? I feel like incidences like this aren't good enough to convince the ones who might be open to being against interbreeding of nations.
I overheard a great conversation a few days ago that this thread presents a good opportunity to share.
Scene: coffee shop, an independent Starbucks type place
Table: Two young men, working class, i.e. not Apple laptop guys.
Action: Young woman enters, sees two men, waves to them, the one man facing her direction gives her a head nod that says "I acknowledge your wave but am not that thrilled at seeing you."
Young woman walks over to table after getting coffee.
"Hey guys, how's it going"
Guy who nodded: "Fine."
(silence, uncomfortable)
Woman: "You're really going to do this, just because I'm dating Mark?"
Guy: "Since you're into beastiality now, why don't you go hang out with the animals and leave us alone"
Woman stomps off.
Now, I don't know for sure, but I'm guessing Mark (Marc?) is black.
I think the words getting out that it's okay to tell mudsharks to play in the shit they chose.
He sounds like the kind of guy who probably reads Alpha Game Blog.
"maybe death is the best case scenario here?" Read your own flippin commenters Vox, and buy a bloody clue.
@Huggums,
Mind the bolded words in my comment. Mull them over in your mind. Lather. Rinse. Repeat.
She was crazy anyway, picture gave it away, and since Darwin is a false god it was just another sacrifice.
Now now, Ligers are not uncontrollable and insane. They can be trained just like other big cats.
However, the crossbreed turns off the normal growth-regulation gene structure, so they grow to be very big indeed - nine foot tall on hind legs, as you can see some pictures online. That makes them only a little more dangerous than a normal big cat.
I think the mudsharking analogy is something like 'physical capabilities with just enough brain to make them dangerous'.
The argument against mudsharking (and oil drilling) is simple: to the extent that biracial children remain in a White community, the practice degrades our genetic stock and that affects the quality of our own children's future.
A fuller discussion of this subject is on my blog: Menu / List of Posts / How to Help Prevent Mudsharking.
So would you say you're opposed to mudsharking? What if she was really fucking hot?
Hey! That's MY line!
The Negro Community is an honor community. Offenses against personal honor ("dissing" or disrespect, in this case) must be met with deadly force to restore a Negro's personal honor. This is to be expected. It is routine.
It would be nice if the American Negro would adopt the "Code Duello", but alas it may be many generations until they take that civilizational step.
For now, however, the best advice for any member of the white community is to avoid them wherever possible.
Post a Comment
NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.