Wednesday, December 14, 2016

Game and Round Two

The Chateau explains that America is already in the midst of a second civil war:
The best way to think about America, now and historically, is as the battleground between rival White factions, with nonwhites and women as shock troops ordered to exploit, respectively, White men’s racial guilt and their white knightery.

One faction — the Runaway Universalists (RU) Whites — is engaged in biological warfare against the Fuck You (FU) Whites, via open borders to the third world.

This is not a recent invention. In the 19th and early 20th centuries, the RU Whites (back then, Yankees of Quaker and Puritan blood) opened the borders to non-Anglo ethnic European immigration, seeking the same goal: defeat of their cousin FUs (loosely organized under the later umbrella term “WASP” for Anglo-Germanics, but including Southern and Appalachian Whites of Scots-Irish descent).

The RU Whites won a surrender and a temporary peace with the FU Whites in America’s first Civil War, but the ethnic faults and schisms persist, and have deepened since then, despite decades of “Diversity is our strength” propaganda.

The end game is the same: hot war. But RU Whites know they can’t win a shooting Civil War 2 now. So their strategy is demographic displacement. This is the strategic undercurrent that will strand a true “White nationalism” political platform from achieving social significance.

The White War pitting RU White ethnics against FU White ethnics will necessarily confine any emergent WN movement to within the FU White sphere of influence, as White Nationalism is inherently a defensive posture against memetic and cultural attack by the RU Whites.
This is why MGTOW is not an option. It is a surrender. It is exactly what the RU-Whites want you to do. Yes, there is a real risk that marrying a white girl and having children with her will end up with you being divorce-raped. It is a risk that you have to take anyhow, for the same reason that a soldier in a shooting war has to take the risk of being shot.

There are casualties in every conflict.

Game helps you reduce the risk of becoming a casualty, but the risk is there for every man no matter what. But so what? Taking risks is what men do. Don't live in fear, go out there and win the war for Western civilization.

Let's face it, if you meet a girl who responds well to being taken by the hand and being told: "Come with me if you want Western civilization to live", there is a good chance she is a keeper.

27 comments:

Laguna Beach Fogey said...

Well said! We need to engage, fight, and stay involved.

But let's be clear. MGTOW and modern marriage are both traps to be avoided. Don't make women and marriage your goal in life. Make the struggle, the jihad, your objective.

Incidentally, some of us have been predicting civil war--i.e., hot war--for years. It's good to see more mainstream sites finally come round to this position.

Cataline Sergius said...

It can be argued that we have been in a low intensity civil war since the late 1960s. Look at our violent crime rate. This is not normal or peaceful.

Ceerilan said...

I just imagined actually using that as an opener. Taking her hand and saying "Come with me if you want Western Civilization to live." Some quite funny responses come to mind.

Seth Schueler said...

"Game helps you reduce the risk of becoming a casualty"
What are the best books on improving game?

praetorian said...

It is a risk that you have to take anyhow, for the same reason that a soldier in a shooting war has to take the risk of being shot.

And help other white men get married, have children and retain their wives.

I now make a habit of trying to find a spot to praise my friends in front of their wives, stressing social status in the community. It works.

dc.sunsets said...

It can be argued that we have been in a low intensity civil war since the late 1960s. Look at our violent crime rate. This is not normal or peaceful.

In socionomic theory, human social behavior occurs in a patterned fractal. tl:dr version--- the entire period from the mid-60's on is a 5th wave, the final motive wave in a larger pattern. It is usually characterized by weakening "internals" even as the Top Line visible things ramp higher and higher.

Stocks, technological marvels and a host of other "top line" things clearly approach "Buck Rogers" levels even as internal signs of rot, weakness and misery are visible everywhere. 40 years ago there were ZERO empty storefronts, strip malls and such with weeds growing up from their parking lots. Now they're EVERYWHERE a visible sign that the engine of prosperity is firing only half its cylinders.

Theory tells me that the social upheaval of the 1960's, raised to a power, should be what's coming.

dc.sunsets said...

The future will belong to those who show up for it. Just because the rest of the world goes collectively insane doesn't mean a man should literally or figuratively hang himself.

My sons are married, two of the three couples have started families. Know that as the world around us becomes more difficult (and social mood becomes more negative) most people will be less inclined to have kids.

Resist this. You're going to see more and more people say, "I don't want to bring children into this chaotic world that promises growing hardship." Fight this notion in yourself. It's just herding behavior, a biologically-driven system we all share, but we need not heed it 100%, not if we want to succeed where most others will fail. Find a sweet-natured girl. Get married. Have kids. It's the greatest part of this adventure we call life.

Be. A. Man.

JCclimber said...

praetorian, that is an excellent strategy. although I've found it to be even more effective if I have my wife say to their wife that I respect him for this or that.

And that is not only how you gain allies, it is how to strengthen the hand of those allies to build a strong network to fight the enemies of Western Civilization.

Vox, nice way to work in the Terminator quote. Did they HAVE to work that same exact quote into every single movie in the franchise? Along with "I'll be back"?

dc.sunsets said...

@ praetorian, mutual respect is the foundation of every successful human relationship. In raising my sons, I eschewed the old bromide, "find them doing something good and praise them," in favor of "nudge them toward doing something respect-worthy and pay them respect." The difference is subtle but I think it matters. Respect, as a reward, is more eucivic than praise.

IMO you are making your little corner of the world a bit better by consciously using the language of respect rather than its faux cousin, flattery.

Bobo #117 said...

"Don't live in fear, go out there and win the war for Western civilization."

One of my mottos of life is "I will not live my life in fear".
I tell it to my young children regularly, and they are developing the trait of fearlessness, (and scaring their mother senseless in the process).

As an aside, it blows the rabbit-assed minds of other "men" when they (half-jokingly, half-scared) say things like, "Wow that's pretty brave to say things like that to your wife!", and I give that standard reply, and add, "If you're scared of your wife, you're probably scared of just about everything in life".

Jed Mask said...

This is why MGTOW is not an option. It is a surrender. It is exactly what the RU-Whites want you to do. Yes, there is a real risk that marrying a white girl and having children with her will end up with you being divorce-raped. It is a risk that you have to take anyhow, for the same reason that a soldier in a shooting war has to take the risk of being shot.

There are casualties in every conflict.

Game helps you reduce the risk of becoming a casualty, but the risk is there for every man no matter what. But so what? Taking risks is what men do. Don't live in fear, go out there and win the war for Western civilization.

Let's face it, if you meet a girl who responds well to being taken by the hand and being told: "Come with me if you want Western civilization to live", there is a good chance she is a keeper."

Hmmm... I agree with the core of your spirited "unction", Mr. Vox; it just seems that the survival of "western civilization" is your *idol* in the midst of this you're trying to save.

I don't personally want "Western Civilization" to complete collapse and deteriorate nor am I so eager to "save it" from it's eventual doom (by God).

I do good and by His Grace "fight the good fight of faith"; but I'm not fighting in vain for the world. You save souls to God and God leads the people in the Right Path.

Mention *GOD* more in this and you'll have me on board with what you're "preaching" here on "Alpha Game".

Seek *GOD FIRST and FOREMOST*. Seek first the *KINGDOM* then everything else added unto you.

All this "talk" you're speaking of is like "egging on" naïve, gullible "beta boys" to go out to fight in vain for *SOMEONE ELSE'S* self-serving agenda. So sad, so pitifully deceiving. I have no respect for such individuals but I care for their welfare and plight.

I fight for *CHRIST* not men.

~ Bro. Jed

Kyle Searle said...

Ooh, we have both Churchians and bad boys out in this thread. Look autists, civilization is not really that complicated. If people agree on rules, and live by them, civilization beats anarchy. Otherwise it doesn't.

texaust said...

@Jed Mask: "Europe is the faith, and the faith is Europe." -- Hilaire Belloc

Mr.MantraMan said...

Over at WRSA an article posted from PJmedia uses all the Game vocabulary

Dirtnapninja said...

Its a theme as old as time..when two factions are in gridlock, there is always a temptation to import foreign tribes to use against your domestic allies. Sometimes it works. Sometimes..well, just ask the Celtic king Vortigern who was overthrown by his Anglo Saxon allies, or the Berber kings who invited the Arabs in.

Unknown said...

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

White man has destroyed western civilization all on his own by allowing his bitch to turn him into a cuck slave. THERE IS NO TURNING BACK

Laramie Hirsch said...

Honestly, in this conversation, a White West is the ultimate prize worth struggling for. There is no other overriding principle guiding this entire collective mind. If there IS something greater, it is given token acknowledgement. In the spirit of this white push, there is no overriding Logos to steer this ship, other than what is confined to the world of the living.

If a White West is the ultimate and final end, then the push for it will only have temporary success in the long run.

(No, I'm not talking about monarchy.)

Thanks, J. said...

LOL.

dc.sunsets said...

All of history is a fractal of sine-waves inside of sine-waves.

While Natural Selection doesn't equate to "advancement" in any common usage, my observation that smart people rarely starve and smart fractions (and factions) tend to succeed tells me that the overall trend in humanity is upward (in common usage.) For this reason, I think relatively intelligent members who carry the genes of Western Civilization are wise to act in concert with an expectation for thriving. The Earth is not going to be inherited by the dull. Idiocracy is not a comedy, but neither is it the End of History.

James said...

For some men going MGTOW is an escape and a surrender, but not for men like me. For me it is a strategic social posture. I'm not inclined to use my energy dealing with a woman in any sort of intimate personal romantic relationship. Maybe living in the San Fran Psycho Bayarrhea Kalifornia perverts my perceptions of women, but the fact is there are not a lot of normal decent women around here; even the one's that don't seem too bad are tainted with Feminazism and cultural Marxism. In my very arrogant opinion, I think that if more men focused on fighting the Feminazi Marxism and less on chasing women the world would be a better place and the supply of quality women would increase to a level where even a guy like me might be willing to take a chance.

Gordon said...

James,

There are more than you realize. There were a lot of women who might have voted for the Bamster, but this time they quietly marked the box by Trump. Women in San Francisco have eyes. They can look around and see the career ism, the lack of children and they can draw conclusions. As Gavin McInnes has pointed out, all of his female friends who put off children do expensive in-vitro (half fail) or adopt some third or fourth world baby which, surprise! has defects, or they get lucky and have a baby on the mild end of the spectrum.

Women may not be good at odds but they can tell which way the wind is blowing. The question is, are you positioning yourself such that when an astute woman recognizes you, she can get your attention?

Resident Moron™ said...

Do your best to find a woman, get married and have some kids. My first marriage was a disaster, my first wife was a disaster, the financial ramifications ongoing. So what?

If nothing else I learned a great deal. My second wife is a vastly different creature to the first. My second marriage is incomparably distinct from the first.

Men not only get killed in war, we get maimed and wounded. But men get up and go again. Learn from your mistakes and then go and redeem them.

If nothing else, anyone reading this column has an immense advantage over the clueless cuck-to-be I was when I first got married.

Cristo said...

I understand the reproduction part. I understand the child-rearing part. I've been there, done that.

I don't understand the marriage part, though (though I have also been there and done that). Why invite the state into your relationship? What advantage is there in that? Why increase your liability that way?

Unknown said...

Mike Cernovich's views on mititgating divorce-rape, and establishing a long term union with a woman to raise your children while avoiding government entanglements are well worth reviewing, for those wondering how to minimize the risks of traditional marriage. see e.g. https://www.goodlookingloser.com/how-to-get-married-and-not-get-burned-discussion-on-legit-prenuptial-agreements

Sam Spade said...

Making stupid gambling bets with very bad consequences it's different to take measured risks.

I know MGTOW it's not the solution to end western feminist laws, and transform society for the better. But intelligent red pilled men entangling themselves in pretty ugly spots just because, we are men and we are brave, it's very bold in a bad way, and a lose of assets.

Just let the blue pilled alphas immolate themselves, red pilled guys have more important roles in the cultural war. Free from legal ropes, they can fulfill their aspirations and make a difference.

Sam Spade said...

I meant blue pilled betas

Bob Loblaw said...

You're going to see more and more people say, "I don't want to bring children into this chaotic world that promises growing hardship."

I've been hearing that ignorant horseshit since I was a kid. The world is more peaceful, more prosperous, and more comfortable than it's ever been.

However. The American legal and cultural environment has never been more hostile to a life-long marital relationship. I get that people need to have children for the nation to survive, but I also suspect that cultural and legal environment won't get less hostile until the people in charge perceive they will not be able to keep doing business as usual.

Post a Comment

NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.