So, since the fifties, these groups have been for women only. Now, after almost 60 years of reverse sexism, they aren’t getting anywhere with their exclusion of men and now want men to join? Seriously? Why would any men join up?Dr. Helen was right. And what we're seeing from the women's networks is only a harbinger. Women are sensing that men not only don't need them anymore, they don't really want anything to do with them. And it scares the hell out of them. As it should, because women need mental buy-in from men a lot more than men need it from women.
Thursday, April 2, 2015
Wait, come back
They belatedly said:
28 comments:
This will be interesting. It had to come to point where women had to start to give something. So, I wonder how far the back pedal will go before the brakes are put back on again? Also, what of those women who truly believe that we don't need men? The fight's should be interesting.
~ Stingray
What heterosexual man who is not a porn addict and not Jesus can resist his sexual urges forever?
They are only inviting men to join to help further female interests, not for mutual benefit of society or the species.
Just another attempt at "He for She".
This is so predictable. As the surrender of the West to its savage enemies gains speed, women (esp White women) will be at even greater risk, so expect more of this.
Weird how they can't seem to get shit done without men around.
If, after 50 years of feminizing the education system, re-tooling the workplace to suit female sensibilities, affirmative action and the enforcement of it all enshrined in law, women, as a group, STILL can't reach the heights of the best of men without asking for yet more help (from men!) to promote them.....well, maybe it's time to acknowledge that men and women can never be equal.
Because the cost of this has been born by the mass of regular men who have been displaced by it all. And now by the women who can't find a man to save them from a grinding job they can never leave.
Seems the bicycles have stopped fishing.
What heterosexual man who is not a porn addict and not Jesus can resist his sexual urges forever?
You'd be surprised.
You do realize that there have been monasteries for centuries where men did exactly that?
This is women lacking and feeling the need for beta orbiter attention. Just a different facet or the "Where have all the good men gone" phenomenon.
The "businesswoman" in professional organizations has likely seen her college associations dry up/move on.
She needs more men around and men with jobs. The ones at work have been whipped into place by HR. The ones at bars are either hot guys trolling for younger women or "creeps" (i.e. not hot).
I'd wager the women clamoring for male inclusion into the associations are the single ones or those looking to trade up.
You do realize that there have been monasteries for centuries where men did exactly that?
There is something to be said for "Out of sight, out of mind."
Come join us in our rowboat! We saved you a seat right next to the oars.
No, they are strong and independent. Boys are dumb, throw rocks at them. Women are all knowing and powerful and don't need a man. Why would they be scared that they finally got men to not like them or want to be with them anymore?
If I had more coin...I'd invest in anxiety medication and anti-depressants. If 25% of them are on that stuff now...it's going to double within 20-30 years.
Women have demanded and gotten into every men's organization in the West. As they get their hands on power within an organization, that organization changes the scope to more benefit women. Then the men head for the exit. It's happening right now with the Rotary Club.
Joining an organization that is explicitly feminist would be begging to be shafted.
A subtext of the invitation is that they only want well connected men to join, not just Joe from accounting or Fred from the mail room.
No, what they want is the option to rub shoulders (or other body parts) with Tom the senior VP or Gary the CEO.
As usual, the invitations will only feed the Apex fallacy because anything less just won't do.
I like the line "“men are instrumental to the success of women". Because the only manner in which that applies to men is in the mother or wife category.
What heterosexual man who is not a porn addict and not Jesus can resist his sexual urges forever?
A man can use porn as an aid for discharging his sexual urges without being an addict, much like one can consume alcohol without being an alcoholic.
I also appreciated this line: “men are instrumental to the success of women,” not for the reason of the previous commenter, but because of the honest intent it showed.
These women want men to join women's associations because men will make the women more successful. We are merely instruments serving the success of women. That is the only use they have for us.
A man would have to be stark staring mad.
You made your bed. Lie in it.
You made your bed. Lie in it.
...Alone.
The parasite gets nervous when the host is too far away.
Come join us in our rowboat! We saved you a seat right next to the oars.
Hahahaha. That's it exactly.
Well, there's a little problem coming up.....a major societal change.....the kind where women are raped and killed in a protracted civil war.....and, well, men are becoming indifferent. Why help your enemy? As I've said many times, let nature take its course. Perceptive women can feel the changes coming.....and, they rightly fear the future. However, they'll be alone.
I also appreciated this line: “men are instrumental to the success of women,” not for the reason of the previous commenter, but because of the honest intent it showed.
Ah, they have a couch they need moved. No thanks, too much cat fur on it.
@Plump Pleasant Plumber
If there is any civil strife of the whites-vs-outsiders version, you can bet that there'll be a lot of unmarried, childless fat older b!tches left by the wayside to die off by the millions as the men prefer to fight only for themselves and the small number of worthwhile women.
Yessir😂 good ole human nature.....they'll really need the men who've they tried their best to destroy......will you feed a starving feminist? Didn't think so. Thing is, in a survival situation, land whales perish.
Want to see the most miserable women on the planet, go to a government office where the white women are now outnumbered by the glorious people of color.
Oh, sure, they are realizing. Not that it matters. Once you lose the men, we will only come back on our terms. You will know that has happened when women return home. And fight, kick, and scratch to stay there, avoid the ballet box, and create what of reality they can through their solid ways in the home. Until then, have none of it.
Actually, the hardest part, is getting men to break the link. I remember stories of Indians setting ambushes, but the young men wanting to take the lead ruined the surprise, blowing it. Same same. Teach your boys. Although ensuring purified (of estrogen especially) water, and making sure they aren't getting large doses of phytoestrogens (beans, grains, fruits, and vegetables... stick with meats) and too much of mother's milk... would help a good deal as well. Embarrass the lad about his mother link, if need be. The sooner the better.
Seriously? Why would any men join up?
The only remotely legitimate reason I can think of is if the organization was originally a men-only (or at least male-controlled) organization that had the misfortune of being completed co-opted by estrogen. The thing is, any such organization that was ever worth anything in the first place has probably already been (or very soon will be) reconstituted under a new name/replaced altogether by an exclusively male group that will be sure to make it clear that estrogen contamination will NOT be tolerated. For all practical purposes, any legacy organization that became the property of women has been destroyed beyond salvage and no man worthy of the name will want anything whatsoever to do with it.
“...men are instrumental to the success of women,” and 39 percent agreed that men should join women’s networking groups that have been set up to promote and advance women in the workforce.
"Instrumental" here is just another term for "essential," one that induces less of a revulsion gag reflex in feminists. The obvious implication here is that women CANNOT really succeed without men carrying them. This, in turn, prompts the obvious question of why anyone would waste effort and resources on people incapable of succeeding on their own merits.
Thank you for this effort
مصراوى توب
رياضة كرة القدم
Post a Comment
NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.