Tuesday, January 20, 2015

Banning breasts

Under pressure from feminists, the Sun gets rid of a 44-year tradition, the Page Three Girl:
The Sun, Britain’s top-selling newspaper, has scrapped Page 3’s topless women after 44 years, delighting the legion of critics who have branded the photos of bare-breasted models sexist, offensive and anachronistic. Insiders said the decision has been taken to kill off the controversial feature quietly but that the feature would continue online.

“This comes from high up, from New York,” said one senior executive in a reference to the paper’s owner Rupert Murdoch.
The Sun refused to respond to any calls, emails or texts from the Guardian throughout Monday but told the Times, which is also owned by Murdoch: “Page 3 of The Sun is where it’s always been, between pages 2 and 4, and you can find Lucy from Warwick at Page3.com.” The paper reported that last Friday’s edition of the paper will be the last that would “carry an image of a glamour model with bare breasts on that page”.

A spokeswoman for the campaign group No More Page 3: “This could be truly historic news and a great day for people power.” adding it “could be a huge step for challenging media sexism”.

The change may be reversed, it is understood, if it results in a noticeable Sun sales decline.
When I was in England, I found Page Three to be cheesy and vulgar, and the girls tended to be on the plain side, but nevertheless, I think it's a huge mistake for the Sun to back down in this way. Feminists are never content with a victory; next they'll soon move on to campaign against lingerie and bikini pictures.


Laguna Beach Fogey said...

Scientific research has demonstrated that looking at bare bikini stuffers has a positive effect on men's health, so this decision is actually another attack on men. Men will no doubt suffer as a result of this ruling.

Laguna Beach Fogey said...

Why does Rupert Murdoch want to kill men?

Yohami said...

Free the nipple, but ban the breast.

Conscientia Republicae said...

Will the feminists declare victory when the Page 3 girl is wearing a burqa?

pdwalker said...


JP said...

I assume the titty model gets paid for her page 3 shoot? If so, aren't they depriving them of work?

Owen said...

Free the nipple, but ban the breast.

That is modern feminism, summarized succinctly.

Vogon X said...

This comes at the same time as British feminists are outraged at complaints that Rita Ora was showing too much cleavage on a recent episode of an entertainment show. In this article a feminist twists herself into a pretzel trying to simultaneously imply ("argue" is too strong a word) that a) women should be able to show as much breast as they feel like, and b) the media should not reproduce images of breasts.

Feminists want to thrust their nipples in your face, and shame you when you have the temerity to notice them.

Anonymous said...

Will the feminists declare victory when the Page 3 girl is wearing a burqa?

No, when there are no longer any printing presses.

Anonymous said...

I was stationed in Germany and stopped at the local gas station to fill up. The wife went inside for a snack. She came back out telling me we were never shopping there again because they sell porn. I informed her it was going to get awfully boring staying at home and never using gasoline again. Every German gas station sells tabloid newspapers showing bare breasts on Page one.

I feel sorry for the future Page 3 girls who will never get their big break. Now British skanks won't have anything to look forward to at 18 and nothing to brag about when they turn 30.

Anonymous said...

The really odd thing about this is that Murdoch just went on a rant about fighting muzzies and then he goes and does something that no only capitulates to feminists but Muslims as well.

tweell said...

I predict that The Sun will have a rather noticeable drop in circulation in the near future.

Anonymous said...

@ Tweell,
Not likely. In a world awash in free porn, it is unlikely that many men are buying the Sun just for Page 3 girl. There is still fish to be wrapped and bird cages needing to be lined as well as fireplaces to start.

swiftfoxmark2 said...

Sounds to me that Page 3 was discontinued because the women weren't supernaturally attractive. Even most feminists don't complain about incredibly attractive women showing their stuff for the world to see. They encourage it.

Anonymous said...

Given the feminist push to normalize women showing breasts in public while breastfeeding, and the feminist assault on showing breasts which don't have babies attached, the feminist message is obvious.

Feminists want the page three girls to pop a baby on those breasts.

Why does Murdoch hate babies?

will said...

Yes! It should be gone. I don't care who's to blame, feminists or other groups. It's immoral and trashy. Whenever I visit the UK, I am shocked at the filth in the media. Some of it's wrapped in public service announcements of school-age teenagers talking about using condoms (oh, let's forget their children.) And the PSA would run their child-porn ads 3 times in half an hour of news! Perverts.

Laguna Beach Fogey said...

Forget about British skanks. Now British bankers and solicitors won't have anything to amuse them on their commute into the City, and British labourers won't have anything to titillate them on their way to the building site. As usual, men suffer.

Much of modern life is about getting rid of anything and everything that gives pleasure and happiness to White men.

Trust said...

My Facebook lit up yesterday. A Democratic friend of mine posted a link to a story of a woman from El Salvador who was sentenced to 30 years in prison over a miscarriage.

Predictably, the article was less about the injustice and more about how "the Right," "conservatives," "Republicans" etc want that here.

The common denominator is that leftism is a religion and anyone in the right will do as the devil, no matter how weak (nonexistent) the link. This is true whether it is divorce, breasts, the workplace, or unjust laws across the ocean. Everything is viewed through the "how can I empower my cause or hurt those who disagree" lenses.

It's the group version of solipsism.

Corvinus said...

Sounds to me that Page 3 was discontinued because the women weren't supernaturally attractive. Even most feminists don't complain about incredibly attractive women showing their stuff for the world to see. They encourage it.

That wouldn't explain Lena Dunham.

jimmy-jimbo said...

Female illogic caused feminists to turn back the clock on themselves. It is a choice to pose topless and it is a choice to buy the newspaper. There is less choice for women to make a living in the newspaper business. What's a working girl to do?

Bogey said...

But they also want to "free the nipple", women will always lead you into the land of confusion if you're dumb enough to follow.

totenhenchen said...

"Feminists want the page three girls to pop a baby on those breasts."

If they allow one to escape abortion.

Cataline Sergius said...


Cataline Sergius said...

Okay got that out of my system.

The SJWs are happy because they can dance around in the endzone and pretend they scored a touch down but the truth is they didn't. The simple truth is they just can't compete with free material. Even Playboy's new CEO says they are moving toward a limited to zero nudity format.

Retrenched said...

Puritans gonna Puritan.

Bike Bubba said...

What others have said about "free the nipple". On one side, you've got the nudists and "sex positive" feminists saying that they should be exposed, on the other, this?

I personally prefer my newspapers without "page 3", but seriously....

will said...

Women don't know what they want. They're destructive without men overseeing them and providing guidance.

Owen said...

Do nudists argue in good faith (that they feel it is natural to be naked in public)? Possibly. However, I note that most "nudists" wear hats, scarves, boots, belts, etc. Pretty much anything except what covers their junk. To me, it's just perversion of another stripe.

chris said...

Yet feminists support Ukrainian Femen who expose their breasts all the time.

Feminism means never having to worry about being consistent.

rick said...

Feminist mentality in a nutshell: "Yes! Cut the baby in half!"


anotheronetakesthepill said...

You don't understand when you compare this to exposing breasts. cleavage, nudism, etc.

Feminism want to ban this cause it's something that pleasures men and doesn't give anything for their cause.

Cataline Sergius said...

Corrections and Clarifications

Uh, guys?

BigFire said...

And they're back.

Mr.MantraMan said...

Its about taboos, who inflicts them gains power, eventually government power and a sinecure of uselessness. In today's West its a grudge match of useless turds trying to gain power by inflicting their version of the Religion of Political Correctness upon us hapless dupes who try to make intellectual sense of each idiocy when there is no sense involved.

Pussy-ManiaGirls: http://goo.gl/w9Oepq said...

watching my collection, we have upload more video at here:

Collection Part 1:

Doggy Style and In Missionary Position

Hot Sex Anal With Amazing Girl Friend

Sex Under Hot Lights Bad Girls

Give Me The Cum

Cum In My Panties

Nude Amateur Teen Girls

Sexy Brunette Girls

Young Kinky Sluts

Busty Tattoo Chick On Car

Young Asian fucked anal

Latina Havana Ginger gets

Teen Threesome Porn

Hot Blowjob

Amateur Pulls Down Tanga

Sweet girl amazing hot

Sexy japanese babes getting their tight


Collection Part 2:

Hot asian blowjob and pussy creampie

Sucking dick, Audrey put vegetables in all holes

Blonde love fuck

Naomi Russell And Her Royal Ass

Sexy blonde gives blowjob in the car










Hardcore Porn Celebrity





100% MAKE you satisfy......

Reply Delete

Post a Comment